#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cosmological ?s
True north will make its closest approach to Polaris at the end of the 21c.
Does anyone know the exact year? And will it later head back towards Thuban in draco? Are the 'dog days' calculated by the rising of the first dog star and the setting of the second? That seems too easy somehow. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Mike wrote:
True north will make its closest approach to Polaris at the end of the 21c. Does anyone know the exact year? And will it later head back towards Thuban in draco? According to Burnham the closest the pole gets to Polaris will be in 2102, at 27'31" distance from the star. The pole traces out a circle (about 47° in diameter) in the heavens, so it doesn't really "head back" but always goes round in the same direction. The precession cycle will return the pole to the vicinity of Thuban in another 21,000 years or so. Are the 'dog days' calculated by the rising of the first dog star and the setting of the second? That seems too easy somehow. It doesn't sound that easy to me! Every star that's visible from a given latitude rises and sets every day, so using these phenomena to define a period of the year requires that they be related to the position of the sun. And what do you mean by "the first dog star" and "the second"? The "Dog Star" is Alpha Canis Majoris, AKA Sirius. Are you thinking of Procyon (which name means "before the dog"), Alpha Canis Minoris, sometimes called the "Little Dog Star", as the other? Depending on the observer's latitude, it rises and sets each day somewhat under an hour before Sirius does. Anyway, I don't believe there's an official definition for the "dog days". Some authors say that a period of about forty days, beginning three weeks before the annual sun-Sirius conjunction and ending three weeks after, constituted the "dog days". But in general the use of the term has more to do with hot summer weather -- which we now know is *not* caused by the star! -- than with its astronomical origins. -- Odysseus |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Odysseus" wrote in message ... According to Burnham the closest the pole gets to Polaris will be in 2102, at 27'31" distance from the star. I would have imagined it closer. The pole traces out a circle (about 47° in diameter) in the heavens, Is it round or oval? Does it go clockwise? so it doesn't really "head back" but always goes round in the same direction. The precession cycle will return the pole to the vicinity of Thuban in another 21,000 years or so. So it must have been closer to Kochab and Pherkad some 10,000 years ago. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Mike wrote:
"Odysseus" wrote in message ... The pole traces out a circle (about 47° in diameter) in the heavens, Is it round or oval? Does it go clockwise? Like most circles, it's round. It goes counterclockwise from the point of view I described; looking down on the earth's north pole from space the 'wobble' would be clockwise. See http://www.opencourse.info/astronomy/introduction/03.motion_earth/ (scroll about halfway down) for an animation showing about ten thousand years of precession as it might be seen from the North Pole. So it must have been closer to Kochab and Pherkad some 10,000 years ago. Not as long as that, more like 3500 years -- and not very close either, about the width of the Little Dipper's bowl from Kochab. Ten thousand years ago I guess it would have been somewhere between Draco's head and Boötes. -- Odysseus |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Odysseus" wrote in message ... Like most circles, it's round. It goes counterclockwise from the point of view I described; looking down on the earth's north pole from space the 'wobble' would be clockwise. See http://www.opencourse.info/astronomy/introduction/03.motion_earth/ (scroll about halfway down) for an animation showing about ten thousand years of precession as it might be seen from the North Pole. Way cool. So the point will be near Errai in 5000ad and Alderamin in 8000ad. The circle is bigger than I presupposed. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Mike wrote:
Way cool. So the point will be near Errai in 5000ad and Alderamin in 8000ad. The circle is bigger than I presupposed. One way to grasp the size of the circle is to picture the noonday sun at the summer solstice, imagining it to be located at the top of the circle. Then the position of the sun at noon on the winter solstice, 47° lower, would be at the 'bottom'. This won't work if you live in the Arctic or Antarctic, though, because the latter position will be below your horizon. -- Odysseus |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cosmological Polaris effect | Oriel36 | Astronomy Misc | 3 | January 23rd 04 05:02 PM |
Cosmological Polaris effect | Oriel36 | Research | 0 | January 20th 04 01:40 PM |
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory on the Formation of the Universe | rev dan izzo | History | 8 | October 9th 03 05:41 PM |
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory on the Formation of the Universe | rev dan izzo | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 29th 03 06:28 PM |