|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
Gravitational Slingshot.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_slingshot .. Flyby Anomaly. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyby_anomaly .. Gravitational slingshot increases velocity of spacecraft without expelling propellant or reaction matter. This obviously voilates newton's third law of motion and flyby anomaly supports voilation of newton's third law of motion. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
"neo" wrote in message oups.com... Gravitational Slingshot. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_slingshot . Flyby Anomaly. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyby_anomaly . Gravitational slingshot increases velocity of spacecraft without expelling propellant or reaction matter. This obviously voilates newton's third law of motion Umm neo, gravitational slingshot hardly disproves Newton's 3rd law. It no more disproves it then when I hit the 8 ball with the cue ball and it goes flying off at an angle. No proprellent or reaction matter is expelled. and flyby anomaly supports voilation of newton's third law of motion. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law ofMotion.
neo wrote:
Gravitational slingshot increases velocity of spacecraft without expelling propellant or reaction matter. This obviously voilates newton's third law of motion and flyby anomaly supports voilation of newton's third law of motion. Not true. The planet involved changes momentum by an amount equal and opposite to the change of the spacecraft's. Of course this is unobservable, due to the enormous mass ratio. Newton's laws are obeyed. Tom Roberts |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
Tom Roberts wrote: neo wrote: Gravitational slingshot increases velocity of spacecraft without expelling propellant or reaction matter. This obviously voilates newton's third law of motion and flyby anomaly supports voilation of newton's third law of motion. Not true. The planet involved changes momentum by an amount equal and opposite to the change of the spacecraft's. Of course this is unobservable, due to the enormous mass ratio. Newton's laws are obeyed. I give you chance to retract before someone add your post to 'immortal fumbles'. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law ofMotion.
neo wrote:
Gravitational Slingshot. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_slingshot Flyby Anomaly. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyby_anomaly Gravitational slingshot increases velocity of spacecraft without expelling propellant or reaction matter. This obviously voilates newton's third law of motion and flyby anomaly supports voilation of newton's third law of motion. Hey stooopid - the planet slows down as the spacecraft speeds up. Linear momentum, angular momentum, and kinetic energy are all exactly conserved. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
"neo" wrote in message oups.com... Gravitational Slingshot. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_slingshot . Flyby Anomaly. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyby_anomaly . Gravitational slingshot increases velocity of spacecraft without expelling propellant or reaction matter. This obviously voilates newton's third law of motion and flyby anomaly supports voilation of newton's third law of motion. You are obviously an idiot. There is a corresponding slow down in the speed of the planet, momentum is conserved. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
"neo" wrote in message ups.com... Tom Roberts wrote: neo wrote: Gravitational slingshot increases velocity of spacecraft without expelling propellant or reaction matter. This obviously voilates newton's third law of motion and flyby anomaly supports voilation of newton's third law of motion. Not true. The planet involved changes momentum by an amount equal and opposite to the change of the spacecraft's. Of course this is unobservable, due to the enormous mass ratio. Newton's laws are obeyed. I give you chance to retract before someone add your post to 'immortal fumbles'. It is you that will be added. |mV| = |Mv| Goodbye, ****head. *plonk* |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:01:26 -0600, neo wrote
(in article . com): Tom Roberts wrote: neo wrote: Gravitational slingshot increases velocity of spacecraft without expelling propellant or reaction matter. This obviously voilates newton's third law of motion and flyby anomaly supports voilation of newton's third law of motion. Not true. The planet involved changes momentum by an amount equal and opposite to the change of the spacecraft's. Of course this is unobservable, due to the enormous mass ratio. Newton's laws are obeyed. I give you chance to retract before someone add your post to 'immortal fumbles'. You are such a moron. PLONK -- You can run on for a long time, Sooner or later, God'll cut you down. ~Johnny Cash |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
neo a écrit :
Gravitational Slingshot. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_slingshot . Flyby Anomaly. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyby_anomaly . Gravitational slingshot increases velocity of spacecraft without expelling propellant or reaction matter. This obviously voilates newton's third law of motion and flyby anomaly supports voilation of newton's third law of motion. Apparently so, but in reality, the new velocity is the vectorial resultant of both the craft's escape velocity and the planet's velocity. The reason why the planet does not actually slow down in reaction is that the minute amount of energy that it contributes to the craft is instantly replenished on account of it being in stable gravitational equilibrium on its orbit. (Remember that force is a function of the inverse square of the distance between the primary and the planet, and that the energy induced is directly related to the force at any given distance. Instead of slingshotting to accelerate, slingshotting to decelerate to a lower velocity is just as easy, it suffices to have the craft approach still parallel to the planet's orbit, but going in from the opposite direction. Newton's third law is fully respected. André Michaud |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion.
neo wrote: Tom Roberts wrote: neo wrote: Gravitational slingshot increases velocity of spacecraft without expelling propellant or reaction matter. This obviously voilates newton's third law of motion and flyby anomaly supports voilation of newton's third law of motion. Not true. The planet involved changes momentum by an amount equal and opposite to the change of the spacecraft's. Of course this is unobservable, due to the enormous mass ratio. Newton's laws are obeyed. I give you chance to retract before someone add your post to 'immortal fumbles'. Take a classical mechanics course and stop being a moron. This is a simple elastic scattering problem. Conservation of kinetic energy, angular momentum, and linear momentum come together to either take away or add to the momentum of the spacecraft depending on what direction the approach relative to the motion of the planet is. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gravitational Slingshot And Voilation of Newton's Third Law of Motion. | neo | History | 90 | January 30th 07 10:56 PM |
Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. | Jeet | Astronomy Misc | 12 | November 20th 04 10:34 PM |
When did Motion First Start ? gravitational instability theory | Br Dan Izzo | History | 0 | September 21st 04 02:35 PM |
When did Motion First Start ? gravitational instability theory | Br Dan Izzo | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 21st 04 02:21 PM |
When did Motion First Start ? gravitational instability theory | Br Dan Izzo | Policy | 0 | September 7th 04 02:38 AM |