MECO theory would have a quantization of quasars per distance from

--- Quoting in parts from NEW SCIENTIST ---
http://www.newscientist.com/article/...uasar-casts-do...
Mysterious quasar casts doubt on black holes

According to the MECO theory, objects in our universe can never
actually collapse to form black holes. When an object gets very dense
and hot, subatomic particles start popping in and out of existence
inside it in huge numbers, producing copious amounts of radiation.
Outward pressure from this radiation halts the collapse so the object
remains a hot ball of plasma rather than becoming a black hole.
(snipped)

Journal reference: The Astronomical Journal (vol 132, p 420)

--- end quoting from NEW SCIENTIST ---

I had a read of that journal, and alot of the terminology is unfamilar
to me and can only assume things. What I was looking for
was more specifics on "...popping in and out of existence"
and some clues as to the type of radiation and variations.
The article suggested that "planetoids mass" was swallowed
by the MECO and resulted in a 30% increase in UV radiation.

I had a look at quasars in Wikipedia for some information on
whether brightness of quasars were correlated with distance,
sort of like a Tifft quantization of quasars per distance.

--- quoting Wikipedia on quasars energy ---
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar

The emission of large amounts of power from a small region requires a
power source far more efficient than the nuclear fusion which powers
stars. The release of gravitational energy[citation needed] by matter
falling towards a massive black hole is the only process known that
can produce such high power continuously. (Stellar explosions -
Supernovas and gamma-ray bursts - can do so, but only for a few
weeks.)


Since quasars exhibit properties common to all active galaxies, the
emissions from quasars can be readily compared to those of small
active galaxies powered by supermassive black holes. To create a
luminosity of 10^40 W ,or Joules per second, (the typical brightness
of a quasar), a super-massive black hole would have to consume the
material equivalent of 10 stars per year. The brightest known quasars
devour 1000 solar masses of material every year. The largest known is
estimated to consume matter equivalent to 600 Earths per hour. Quasars
'turn on' and off depending on their surroundings, and since quasars
cannot continue to feed at high rates for 10 billion years, after a
quasar finishes accreting the surrounding gas and dust, it becomes an
ordinary galaxy.
--- end quoting ---

If quasars are all MECOs (and I believe that to be true) then
they should be distributed for the most part, near the Nucleus
of the Atom Totality. They should be in the zone beyond the
Sloan Great Wall, and rarely found between the Sloan Great
Wall and the Milky Way.

And there should be a correlation of purely distance from the
Nucleus to forming a quasar. The closer or nearby the Nucleus
is the chances of having a quasar is huge. That is because
the closer to the Nucleus the more dense the matter of the
Universe, and matter to fuel the MECO disc of a quasar.

Thus, not only are quasars most often found near the Nucleus
but that they are the most energetic when getting closer to the
Nucleus.

This happens to be the what the current data on quasars reports--
the most powerful quasars are the furthest away and the further
away are the most abundant number of quasars.

The Big Bang theory with its black-hole explanations cannot
make sense of the fact that quasars are most abundant beyond
the Sloan Great Wall and the most luminous beyond the Sloan.

But the Atom Totality predicts that to be the case because the
most matter is dense around the Nucleus and sparse the further
away.

And, the mistake made by the Wikipedia authors of the above
is that they neglected "matter to antimatter annihilation" as the
source of radiation. So that as a MECO swallows up a
planetoid or a star, it in a sense converts the entire mass into
energy. Only in an Atom Totality can you have matter to
antimatter annihilation explaining quasars, because Space
is the Dirac Ocean of Positrons and matter is of the "Atom
Totality's electrons" So the two meeting in a MECO results
in a quasar.

P.S. I can see that in the next edition, that probably the MECO
theory with its new reports will be perhaps the largest single
evidence of the Atom Totality theory and displacing galaxy
distribution and Tifft quantized galaxy speeds; replacing them
as the largest supporting evidence.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

I want to say something about one company having too much control over
the science newsgroups, and a control with motivation of ad money
revenue.

And how I long for the day when we used to have Deja News.

Anyway, recently about a month ago Google had a software that in a
sense screened what topics one sees when opening up sci.physics, based
upon the viewers last topics and sites visited. Trouble with this, is
that
if allowed to go too far, then it makes a mockery of the "posting
order".
It makes a mockery of the actual real time posts on the board.

So that a viewer who opens up sci.math will see his post in the first
ten
posts, but in actuality everyone else on the planet opening sci.math
would see that post as number 286 if they had the time to scroll
through
that mess.

So this is where University forums play a key role in Usenet science
newsgroups
in that these forums are not motivated by a ad revenue money, but is
dedicated
to knowledge and education.

So conceivably, one of these days, the forums such as Drexel's Math
Forum
and other Universities get so disgusted with the constant mickey mouse
changing
of Google newsgroups and a constant veering away from what DejaNews
did better
under their software which Google never came close to Deja's
facilitation. That
these Forums become so disgusted that they just simply have their own
sci.math
and sci.physics.

Or, maybe that is how it naturally evolves in that Drexel's Math Forum
seems to
have eliminated all the commercial spam. So you use Google as the
"free-for-all"
and weed it out in the Forums.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies