A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Brad Guth's Credentials



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old March 5th 06, 04:57 AM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Brad Guth's Credentials

Eric Chomko; Sleeper cell? No, I think you think we're out to
terrorize you. But that's just your paranoia.

Paranoia has certainly become my middle name, but what you've posted
previously has been nothing but a Usenet butt-load of topic/author
stalking, bashing and every bit as much sharing of your LLPOF naysayism
and brown-nosed flak of those status quo wag-thy-dog infomercials, as
much as you and your incest cloned borg collective can muster.

Yes, but only by your definition of "knowledge".

But that's just the same basis as it is within your subjective
interpretation based knowledge, as per say having conditional laws of
physics and no observationology argument basis whatsoever (just another
mainstream boat load of naysayism), whereas it's been my subjective
prosayism as to the interpretations that fits entirely within the
regular laws of physics, as well as that of my prosayism as to having
shared so much other that conforms to a good many hard-science matter
of facts, as to what's conforming and replication worthy to the best of
what we know of, which tells myself that my observationology and
subsequent interpretations to what's situated on Venus as being of
intelligent/artificial worth is far more than good enough, at least to
suit all those except the born-again pagan brown-nosed naysayers, that
which regardless of the facts simply wouldn't believe they were born of
their own mother.

Venus EXPRESS data should soon add bits of badly needed fuel to may
ongoing fires and/or reloading my lose cannons worth of what you'd call
"paranoia".

At least my LSE-CM/ISS plan of action that's related to utilizing LL-1
is yet another positive realm of what has been doable and Earth-science
beneficial, with only the incest bigotry likes of rusemasters as
yourselves holding back the tide of what's the truth and nothing but
the truth. You've continually excluded evidence and otherwise having
been intent upon keeping each and every one of those perpetrated
cold-war lids on tight, just exactly like good old Hitler would have
wanted. Of folks like yourself simply couldn't be any more Third Reich
brown-nose minion worthy if you'd tried.

Therefore, if that's paranoia, then so be it. At least my honest
paranoia has a perfectly good and rational basis of remorse, and I
certainly have a whole lot more than a gram worth of consideration for
the lower 99.9% of humanity, that being the exact opposit of your 100+%
support of whatever suits the upper most 0.1% of humanity. Meaning it
would take a thousand fold of myself to being as disinfo and/or
nondisclosure flatulence worthy as you have been, which is not to say
that there weren't a good many perfectly nice folks working honorably
for the likes of Hitler, or merely having been looking the other way as
long as the situation wasn't about to nail their butt or otherwise
impact their quality of life, or perhaps of these days equating the
entire situation as per getting into being the likes of folks like
yourself looking the other way while our resident warlord(GW Bush) is
going postal along with his trigger happy sidekick(Dick Cheney).
-
Brad Guth

  #22  
Old March 5th 06, 05:40 AM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Brad Guth's Credentials

Brad worte:

my observationology and
subsequent interpretations to what's situated on Venus as being of
intelligent/artificial worth is far more than good enough,

HA HA HA, not hardly

  #23  
Old March 6th 06, 07:40 AM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Brad Guth's Credentials

Dear Sir Naysay Eric Chomko,
Keep up the good naysayism work, that which yourself and of your Skull
and Bones expects of the likes of such a fine and all-knowing
brown-nosed collective of such high standards and accountability
without a shred of remorse.

Brad, none of those links indicates that life exists today on Venus, as
you claim. Only that life COULD have existed due to the fact that the
sun's energy was 25-40% less than it is today. The point is that Veuns a
billion years ago, according to the above links, was more like earth
today. And when making claims from a billion years ago, there is lots of
room for error.


That's rather odd, as I never once said there wasn't room for error.
As it certainly could be of ETs that simply utilize applied technology
in order to tolerate the somewhat testy situation at hand, although I
do believe that I've sufficiently stipulated that I've certainly made
way more than my fair share of mistakes, thus to error is second nature
to just about everything that I manage to accomplish. I'm also not the
least bit all-knowing nor without a good number of personal faults. I
believe it's called being human.

For example; I could be entirely dead wrong about there being a
Venusian HOOTERS Bar & Grill as representing any part of that community
of such massive structures, whereas nearby I've otherwise identified
the perfectly natural looking fluid arch that's situated somewhat due
South of that fairly complex tarmac formation that's by way your SWAG
as having zilch to base such on is supposedly nothing more than just
another interesting pile of hot rock that just so happens to look
exactly like a fairly large and complex tarmac.

I'll bet that you can't so much as tell us how the hell it is that you
know with any certainty that those are merely hot rocks?

I don't doubt that our sun was cooler a billion years ago, although I
can't seem to prove that any more than any of us can prove exactly how
long Venus has been with us, or vise versa. I also don't doubt for a
minute that if our Earth had become as geothermally active and
subsequently having created that thick and somewhat nasty soup of an
atmospheric density, as well as having 10% less gravity to boot,
whereas just stop and think of what absolutely terrific sorts of nifty
and large structural sorts of things we could have easily accomplished
within a buoyancy of 65 bar/m3, especially if there were an ongoing
global warming incentive of our entire world gradually getting itself
hotter than hell. Would you care to discuss the timeline of that
thermal shift from the once upon a time being tropically cozy to
getting downright extra toasty?

How about, what if Earth were to be seriously impacted with the likes
of a mosly iron plus somewhat heavier element worthy asteroid of 10,000
megatonnes, and subsequently mother Earth having developed a good dozen
Mauna Kea and Tambora class of massive volcanoes as going off at once;
how long before the last man/woman would be taking their final polluted
breath of scorch hot and nasty atmosphere?

You most certainly may continue to exclude all the evidence you can
manage to keep covered up with your fat status quo or bust butt.
Meanwhile, there has been other life as we know it and most likely of
whatever we refuse to accept that goes on and on in spite of whatever
the likes of yourself has to say, and perhaps some of that other life
could certainly have evolved and/or having intelligently adapted other
than upon Earth, and thus either way could still be sufficiently alive
and kicking on Venus.

There's still a perfectly good observation as there was as of 6+ years
ago, as to what looks as though representing a signature of other
intelligent life as having existed/coexisted upon Venus. It's simply
my best interpretation of what's clearly indicated within the image
and, fortunately it's by way of a far better format of image quality
than you're giving it credit.

BTW, Eric; I've never insisted of what I'm interpreting is still of
what's alive and kicking as of today. It most certainly could be quite
dead, as in summarily having been roasted to death as of centuries ago.
However, with such available energy that's green/renewable, exactly
where's the big insurmountable problem?

One thing for certain is that unless we're talking about the likes of
those 200+ kg exoskeletal microbes, such Venusian microbes don't likely
construct bridges, quarry sites, townships and especially along with
such having a good sized tarmac and of what looks as though an
absolutely massive rigid airship, plus a good dozen other interesting
attributes that look every bit as intelligent and rational as all get
out.
-
Brad Guth

  #24  
Old March 7th 06, 06:53 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Brad Guth's Credentials

Pat Flannery ) wrote:


: Eric Chomko wrote:

: Brad Guth ) wrote:
: : I honestly didn't realize that Eric Chomko and Pat Flannery were a
: : Usenet sleeper-cell of wet-bed partners in crimes against humanity.
:
: Sleeper cell? No, I think you think we're out to terrorize you. But that's
: just your paranoia.
:
:

: I think that he thinks that you think that I think that Eric thinks that
: Brad thinks that we are out to terrorize him; but again, that's just
: what I think. But now back to my wet sleeper cell in Spandau Prison.

Things are much better now that you're running the asylum...

Eric

: Pat
  #25  
Old March 7th 06, 07:06 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Brad Guth's Credentials

Brad Guth ) wrote:
: Eric Chomko; Sleeper cell? No, I think you think we're out to
: terrorize you. But that's just your paranoia.

: Paranoia has certainly become my middle name, but what you've posted
: previously has been nothing but a Usenet butt-load of topic/author
: stalking, bashing and every bit as much sharing of your LLPOF naysayism
: and brown-nosed flak of those status quo wag-thy-dog infomercials, as
: much as you and your incest cloned borg collective can muster.

Because I tell you you're full of ****? hahahahaha

: Yes, but only by your definition of "knowledge".

: But that's just the same basis as it is within your subjective
: interpretation based knowledge, as per say having conditional laws of
: physics and no observationology argument basis whatsoever (just another
: mainstream boat load of naysayism), whereas it's been my subjective
: prosayism as to the interpretations that fits entirely within the
: regular laws of physics, as well as that of my prosayism as to having
: shared so much other that conforms to a good many hard-science matter
: of facts, as to what's conforming and replication worthy to the best of
: what we know of, which tells myself that my observationology and
: subsequent interpretations to what's situated on Venus as being of
: intelligent/artificial worth is far more than good enough, at least to
: suit all those except the born-again pagan brown-nosed naysayers, that
: which regardless of the facts simply wouldn't believe they were born of
: their own mother.

Sometimes you must accept the fact that a belief in common knowledge isn't
some sort of conformance behavior. Face it Brad, 2+2 will ALWAYS equal 4.
It is the nature of the reference frame, the rules of mathmatics and the
accepted answer universally. Your continual attempt to always "think out
of the box" isn't necessarily the path to truth. In fact, quite the
opposite.

: Venus EXPRESS data should soon add bits of badly needed fuel to may
: ongoing fires and/or reloading my lose cannons worth of what you'd call
: "paranoia".

If they don't tell you what you want to hear, you'll write it off as part
of your Third Reich rant.

: At least my LSE-CM/ISS plan of action that's related to utilizing LL-1
: is yet another positive realm of what has been doable and Earth-science
: beneficial, with only the incest bigotry likes of rusemasters as
: yourselves holding back the tide of what's the truth and nothing but
: the truth. You've continually excluded evidence and otherwise having
: been intent upon keeping each and every one of those perpetrated
: cold-war lids on tight, just exactly like good old Hitler would have
: wanted. Of folks like yourself simply couldn't be any more Third Reich
: brown-nose minion worthy if you'd tried.

How long will be it be until YOU claim to have gone to Venus?

: Therefore, if that's paranoia, then so be it. At least my honest
: paranoia has a perfectly good and rational basis of remorse, and I
: certainly have a whole lot more than a gram worth of consideration for
: the lower 99.9% of humanity, that being the exact opposit of your 100+%
: support of whatever suits the upper most 0.1% of humanity. Meaning it
: would take a thousand fold of myself to being as disinfo and/or
: nondisclosure flatulence worthy as you have been, which is not to say
: that there weren't a good many perfectly nice folks working honorably
: for the likes of Hitler, or merely having been looking the other way as
: long as the situation wasn't about to nail their butt or otherwise
: impact their quality of life, or perhaps of these days equating the
: entire situation as per getting into being the likes of folks like
: yourself looking the other way while our resident warlord(GW Bush) is
: going postal along with his trigger happy sidekick(Dick Cheney).

You lust after Condi Rice, don't you? Admit it!!!!

Eric

: -
: Brad Guth

  #26  
Old March 7th 06, 08:35 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Brad Guth's Credentials

Eric Chomko,
Can I quote and thus publish everything you've contributed in this
topic, as well as elsewhere, as per your typical two-faced naysayism
(aka status quo or bust) responses to the likes of whatever I've
contributed?

If they don't tell you what you want to hear, you'll write it off
as part of your Third Reich rant.

You know that I can easily prove that's not true, and thus you're
admitting to being just another pro-Bush LLPOF rusemaster, of which
anyone can easily prove by way of your own words.

Unlike yourself, I'm absolutely dead certain that we'll learn a thing
or two from the ESA's Venus EXPRESS mission. Some of which will
reinforce the status quo, while other new and improved information is
likely going to blow our status quo socks off.

For starters, the Venusian geothermal activity is simply way more
extensive than you're giving it credit.
-
Brad Guth

  #27  
Old March 9th 06, 05:37 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Brad Guth's Credentials

Brad Guth ) wrote:
: Eric Chomko,
: Can I quote and thus publish everything you've contributed in this
: topic, as well as elsewhere, as per your typical two-faced naysayism
: (aka status quo or bust) responses to the likes of whatever I've
: contributed?

Publish? You? Surely, you jest. WHO would publish you? I'm waiting...

: If they don't tell you what you want to hear, you'll write it off
: as part of your Third Reich rant.

: You know that I can easily prove that's not true, and thus you're
: admitting to being just another pro-Bush LLPOF rusemaster, of which
: anyone can easily prove by way of your own words.

No, Brad, you're predictable. Your outlandish crap has a pattern.

: Unlike yourself, I'm absolutely dead certain that we'll learn a thing
: or two from the ESA's Venus EXPRESS mission. Some of which will
: reinforce the status quo, while other new and improved information is
: likely going to blow our status quo socks off.

That can be said of every single deep space mission that is successful.
Think Viking, Voyager, Pioneer, MER, etc.

: For starters, the Venusian geothermal activity is simply way more
: extensive than you're giving it credit.

Ishtar Plateau expanding, maybe swelling? I be that'll get you excited.
haha

Eric

: -
: Brad Guth

  #28  
Old March 9th 06, 10:36 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Brad Guth's Credentials

Thanks for the official go-ahead on publishing your words. I've always
wanted to tell folks exactly what names are associated with the ongoing
naysayism and mainstream status quo crapolla that has been running us
amuck.

Ishtar Plateau expanding, maybe swelling? I be that'll
get you excited. haha

You and your brown-nose collective know exactly what I mean, and it's
no "haha".

At least I believe in the regular laws of physics, as well as I tend to
trust the likes of hard-science that can obviously be replicated. I
have few problems with connecting dots, especially if it's on behalf of
humanity and of advancing the good parts of science that offers the
most value to the lower 99.9% of humanity. How about yourself?
-
Brad Guth

  #29  
Old March 13th 06, 01:37 AM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Brad Guth's Credentials

Eric,
You never did mention; If you're supposedly not per say a Usenet
sleeper-cell, are you still into physically sleeping with Pat?

Or, is it much worse off than we've imagined?
-
Brad Guth

  #30  
Old March 13th 06, 10:37 AM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Brad Guth's Credentials

Brad Guth wrote:
Eric,
You never did mention; If you're supposedly not per say a Usenet
sleeper-cell, are you still into physically sleeping with Pat?

Or, is it much worse off than we've imagined?
-
Brad Guth


Speak for yourself, brad! *_ I'VE_* been imagining a long term three-way
involving drew barrymore, lucy liu, myself, 2 fifths of tully, take out
from wes' rib house, and a background sound track by the rippingtons.

at the very least, I think this sounds much more interesting than
worrying about sleeper cells...

Bob
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brad Guth's Credentials Robert Juliano Policy 0 February 19th 06 11:01 PM
Brad Guth's Credentials Robert Juliano History 0 February 19th 06 11:01 PM
Brad Guth's Credentials AM Amateur Astronomy 0 February 19th 06 03:26 AM
Brad Guth's Credentials Tom Randy Amateur Astronomy 0 January 7th 06 11:37 AM
Brad Guth's Credentials Fred Garvin Amateur Astronomy 0 January 7th 06 03:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.