|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
New Apollo landing site photos
On Dec 9, 6:08*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Brad Guth wrote: On Dec 9, 5:44*am, Fred J. McCall wrote: Brad Guth wrote: On Dec 7, 1:35*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Dec 6, 8:55*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote: Brad Guth wrote: Do you still think our DARPA and NASA/Apollo was always telling us the whole truth and nothing but the truth ... Not the whole truth (some things are classified), but no lies. ... about those missions that still do not add up? Try taking your shoes off. Did we really have those 100% proof fly-by-rocket landers? You really are an ignorant sod. Where's the objective proof? Uh, stuff left on the moon, witnesses, etc. *Have they got to bury you there before you consider it 'proof'? Why wouldn't anyone demonstrate those fly-by-rocket landers that could have been easily scaled to suit Earth gravity? I see you don't know anything about engineering (either). -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is *only stupid." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine Selective obfuscation is the exact same thing as telling lies. *If you or I did such in private life, they’d put us in prison for treason or something worse. *Of course if we were corrupted bankers, insurance cabals or something involving bogus mortgages and securities fraud, they’d only have given us bailout loot to burn. It should have been only too simple to off-load a fly-by-rocket prototype lander in order to refine and proof its capability and stability before sending it off to our moon. Of what’s still classified is also proof that our NASA with their team of Zionist Nazi wizards had more to hide or obfuscate from us than just their special technology. *You see, open field demonstrating such advanced technology and its unique operator expertise has nothing whatsoever to do with disclosing its R&D details, but then you LLPOF FUD-masters already knew that all along. Of course public funded parrots, brown-nosed clowns and FUD-masters like yourself have no viable option without violating your lethal enforced nondisclosure policy. BTW; *when did I ever say we couldn’t manage to get stuff onto the moon? Is there anything about Kodak photographics or digital PhotoShop that our NASA Apollo era plus more recent expertise can’t do? The same cranky old list of a dozen other pesky factors that have never added up, still applies. *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” still not updating, because it's a moderated topic? Individual topics on Usenet cannot be moderated, you Guthball. It's slower because of the vast conspiracy by the Cabal.... -- Cabal Member #666 I just proved otherwise. *Sorry about that. That's right. *There is no Secret Usenet Cabal and if you try to prove it we'll make sure it comes out right. -- Cabal Member #666 Exactly, because the mainstream status quo cabal is exactly what it is, K12+ indoctrination on steroids, just like being or acting like a devout ZNR(Zionist Nazi Republican or Redneck) is exactly what that is too. Are you going to suggest that public-funded and/or faith-based funded FUD-masters, as Usenet/newsgroup insiders, don't really exist? (because at least that would be real funny) Of course you ZNR job specifies that you and other brown-nosed minion clowns respond in a timely way, and as discrediting towards others as possible. At least that's what Hitler, GW Bush and Dick Cheney always required of their staff and it's armed forces (aka absolute obedience, or else). http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
New Apollo landing site photos
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 06:39:24 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Don't take your lithium, Guthball. It makes your sperm salty and I hate salty spermies. What a dilemma! |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
New Apollo landing site photos
On Dec 11, 6:13*am, george152 wrote:
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 06:39:24 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote: Don't take your lithium, Guthball. It makes your sperm salty and I hate salty spermies. What a dilemma! Why are you here, george152? What has george152 ever contributed to humanity or on behalf of the environment besides butt-loads of trauma and grief? http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
New Apollo landing site photos
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:59:57 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth wrote:
On Dec 11, 6:13*am, george152 wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 06:39:24 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote: Don't take your lithium, Guthball. It makes your sperm salty and I hate salty spermies. What a dilemma! Why are you here, george152? What has george152 ever contributed to humanity or on behalf of the environment besides butt-loads of trauma and grief? Wanna suck? *NO* Assclown. |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
New Apollo landing site photos
On Dec 13, 12:44*pm, george152 wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:59:57 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth wrote: On Dec 11, 6:13*am, george152 wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 06:39:24 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote: Don't take your lithium, Guthball. It makes your sperm salty and I hate salty spermies. What a dilemma! Why are you here, george152? What has george152 ever contributed to humanity or on behalf of the environment besides butt-loads of trauma and grief? Wanna suck? *NO* Assclown. So you don't seem to know why you are here, and you've never contributed anything to the betterment of humanity or the environment. Good for you, george152, because I've got garden compost that's more important and more valuable than yourself. Can you at least explain why our NASA, DARPA and their Apollo Kodak era was so metallicity colorblind? http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hubble looking at Apollo landing site | Ray Vingnutte | Misc | 1 | August 19th 05 03:18 AM |
Which Apollo landing site would you revisit? | Hallerb | History | 14 | August 4th 03 08:30 AM |
Which Apollo landing site would you revisit? | Derek Lyons | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 2nd 03 08:00 PM |
Which Apollo landing site would you revisit? | EAC | History | 2 | July 13th 03 08:26 PM |
Which Apollo landing site would you revisit? | Hallerb | History | 4 | July 11th 03 09:29 PM |