A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Deep space Dragon spacecraft?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 20th 12, 07:45 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Rick Jones
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 685
Default Deep space Dragon spacecraft?

How much space is required per person for long duration (I assume the
issue is duration rather than distance) space travel? Does anything
set a good starting point for estimation?

I would think that what one can deal with over six days is rather
different than what one would deal with for six weeks or six months
etc etc.

rick jones
--
Don't anthropomorphize computers. They hate that. - Anonymous
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway...
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...
  #2  
Old July 20th 12, 09:10 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Jeff Findley[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,388
Default Deep space Dragon spacecraft?

In article ,
says...

How much space is required per person for long duration (I assume the
issue is duration rather than distance) space travel? Does anything
set a good starting point for estimation?

I would think that what one can deal with over six days is rather
different than what one would deal with for six weeks or six months
etc etc.


This has been studied over and over by both NASA and Russia. Google
"simulated space mission".

For example:

Crew selected for Hawaii simulated space mission, July 7, 2012
http://washingtonexaminer.com/crew-s...mulated-space-
mission/article/feed/2009877

MARS-500 (Russian simulation of a manned Mars mission)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MARS-500

Lost in simulated space on the way to Mars by Wang Ru for China Daily,
Jan 19, 2012
http://www.marsdaily.com/reports/Los...n_the_way_to_M
ars_999.html

No doubt there are numerous scientific papers on the subject.

Jeff
--
" Ares 1 is a prime example of the fact that NASA just can't get it
up anymore... and when they can, it doesn't stay up long. "
- tinker
  #3  
Old July 20th 12, 09:17 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Jeff Findley[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,388
Default Deep space Dragon spacecraft?

In article ,
says...

In article ,

says...

How much space is required per person for long duration (I assume the
issue is duration rather than distance) space travel? Does anything
set a good starting point for estimation?

I would think that what one can deal with over six days is rather
different than what one would deal with for six weeks or six months
etc etc.


This has been studied over and over by both NASA and Russia. Google
"simulated space mission".

For example:

Crew selected for Hawaii simulated space mission, July 7, 2012
http://washingtonexaminer.com/crew-s...mulated-space-
mission/article/feed/2009877

MARS-500 (Russian simulation of a manned Mars mission)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MARS-500

Lost in simulated space on the way to Mars by Wang Ru for China Daily,
Jan 19, 2012
http://www.marsdaily.com/reports/Los...n_the_way_to_M
ars_999.html

No doubt there are numerous scientific papers on the subject.


Almost forgot about NEEMO missions on Aquarius. The simulated
"missions" are not as long as needed to get to Mars and back, but the
underwater lab is rather small when compared to the Mars mission
simulators, so it's likely another useful data point.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEEMO

http://aquarius.uncw.edu/about/

Jeff
--
" Ares 1 is a prime example of the fact that NASA just can't get it
up anymore... and when they can, it doesn't stay up long. "
- tinker
  #4  
Old July 20th 12, 09:36 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Rick Jones
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 685
Default Deep space Dragon spacecraft?

Jeff Findley wrote:

MARS-500 (Russian simulation of a manned Mars mission)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MARS-500


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MARS-500#Facility suggests there were 550
cubic meters of volume there. Shared by a crew of 6 people.

Lost in simulated space on the way to Mars by Wang Ru for China Daily,
Jan 19, 2012
http://www.marsdaily.com/reports/Los...ars_999.htm l


Says he had a 3 square meter space of his own out of the space in the
simulated spacecraft.

So, I have the person with whom you are debating killfiled, so I may
have missed something but what else is expected to be coming along for
the ride with Orion? Any chance of another "Shimmer" moment with one
person thinking Orion alone and another thinking Orion docked with
something else?

rick jones
--
No need to believe in either side, or any side. There is no cause.
There's only yourself. The belief is in your own precision. - Joubert
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway...
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...
  #5  
Old July 23rd 12, 01:42 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Jeff Findley[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,388
Default Deep space Dragon spacecraft?

In article ,
says...

Jeff Findley wrote:

MARS-500 (Russian simulation of a manned Mars mission)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MARS-500

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MARS-500#Facility suggests there were 550
cubic meters of volume there. Shared by a crew of 6 people.

Lost in simulated space on the way to Mars by Wang Ru for China Daily,
Jan 19, 2012
http://www.marsdaily.com/reports/Los...ars_999.htm l


Says he had a 3 square meter space of his own out of the space in the
simulated spacecraft.

So, I have the person with whom you are debating killfiled, so I may
have missed something but what else is expected to be coming along for
the ride with Orion? Any chance of another "Shimmer" moment with one
person thinking Orion alone and another thinking Orion docked with
something else?


I don't think either of us really knows what would be "needed" until
someone better defines what a "deep space mission" is in terms of
duration. Unfortunately, NASA seems to be going about this ass-
backwards by building vehicles before defining missions.

One person was thinking Orion plus a space station core module, plus a
Bigelow inflatable module, plus a propulsion module... It all started
to sound rather large, especially if a "deep space mission" was to and
from the moon (which is only about 3 days travel to get there).

I was giving the example of what Apollo 8 did with "just" a CSM. I
think Orion is already well suited to basic transportation. In some
ways, it's more "roomy" than the space shuttle orbiter's pressurized
volume (flight deck and mid-deck).

I think a lot of things change if the destination already has some sort
of space station, lander, habitat, etc. Why drag all that along with
you if your destination already has it all?

It would be like driving a huge RV cross country only to stay in a five
star hotel at your destination. If a hotel is your destination, perhaps
a much smaller RV would be cheaper...

Jeff
--
" Ares 1 is a prime example of the fact that NASA just can't get it
up anymore... and when they can, it doesn't stay up long. "
- tinker
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SpaceX Dragon spacecraft for low cost trips to the Moon. Robert Clark History 1 February 13th 12 07:51 PM
SpaceX Dragon spacecraft for low cost trips to the Moon. Robert Clark History 1 February 8th 12 10:31 PM
SpaceX Dragon spacecraft for low cost trips to the Moon. Robert Clark History 7 December 13th 10 04:05 PM
SpaceX Dragon spacecraft for low cost trips to the Moon. Robert Clark Astronomy Misc 3 December 13th 10 02:11 PM
SpaceX Dragon spacecraft for low cost trips to the Moon. Robert Clark Policy 1 December 13th 10 12:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.