A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hoagland a fraud?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #122  
Old March 18th 04, 05:09 PM
*
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hoagland a fraud?

On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:43:19 -0700, "Jay Windley"
wrote:


"*" wrote in message
.. .
|
| Hey when you want to know something, go to the source.
|
| In this case, it's NASA.

You missed the point.


Projection noted. Fallacy of missing the point.

snip drivel
  #123  
Old March 18th 04, 05:10 PM
Brett Buck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hoagland a fraud?

Peter Stickney wrote:
In article ,
Sander Vesik writes:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
would the be the AT&T phone company, the Sprint phone company, the Worldcom
phone company or some other 'the' phone company?



No, that would be TPC, The Phone Company. Famous for their
development of the Cerebral Communicator in the 1960s. The naturial
enemy, along with the FBR, of the CIB.

Everyone hates The Phone Company. Even Beduins hate The Phone Company.
Perhaps Agent Kropotkin can fill yo in. He's a stockholder.




Greatest movie ever! And, it's a documentary!

Brett

  #124  
Old March 18th 04, 06:44 PM
OM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hoagland a fraud?

On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:07:38 GMT, * wrote:


The point is, Lockheed is controlling the phone companies.


....Yeah, and drugs fried your addled mind. Either that, or you took
that corded vibrator into the bathtub while it was still plugged into
both ends.

PLONK

....Kids, he's a Maxson. Only Maxsons have beefs against Lockmart like
this. Just killfile the little canusfellatius and be done with him.

OM

  #125  
Old March 18th 04, 08:33 PM
*
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hoagland a fraud?

On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:44:39 -0600, OM wrote:

On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:07:38 GMT, * wrote:


The point is, Lockheed is controlling the phone companies.


...Yeah, and drugs fried your addled mind.


I don't take drugs, so by your logic the above statement is correct.

And it is.

snip swoon

Lockheed's telephone satellites:
http://spaceflightnow.com/news/0003/01garuda1orbit/

http://www.lmtas.com/contacts/

http://www.npac.com/docs/NeuStar_Pre...ase120199.html

http://www.nanpa.com/

http://www.gis.net/~larrabee/LM****ch.htm

http://telephonyonline.com/ar/teleco...heed/index.htm



http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/st.../335014&EDATE=

Lockheed Martin IMS to Administer North America's Telephone Numbering System

WASHINGTON, Oct. 10 /PRNewswire/ -- Lockheed Martin IMS today announced
that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has issued an order
selecting
the company to serve as the administrator of North America's telephone
numbering system.
While final terms of the agreement are still being negotiated, the
five-year contract is valued at about $25 million. As a neutral,
third-party
provider of telecommunications services, Lockheed Martin IMS will oversee
the
assignment of area codes, three-digit central office codes, carrier
identification codes and other numbering resources throughout the United
States, Canada, Bermuda and much of the Caribbean.
"Number administration is a critical part of North America's
telecommunication industry. The demand for telephone numbers to feed fax
machines, the Internet, cell phones and other new technologies is booming,"
said Jeffrey Ganek, senior vice president and managing director of
communications industry services for Lockheed Martin IMS. "Lockheed Martin
IMS has already assembled a team of highly seasoned, technical professionals
to meet the growing needs of the telecommunications industry, ensure a level
playing field for competitors and enhance the quality of services to phone
customers throughout North America."
In addition to monitoring North America's 225 area codes and more than
180,000 local exchanges, the company will analyze trends within area codes
to
determine when available numbers will be depleted within a code area. It
will
then assist the local phone industry and regulators in proposing relief
plans.
The FCC's selection of Lockheed Martin IMS as the North American
Numbering
Plan Administrator (NANPA) was recommended last May by the North American
Numbering Council.
The project will be headed by Ron Conners, the former director NANPA
administration at Bellcore, who was hired by Lockheed Martin IMS in
September
because of his expertise in number plan administration.

************************************************** ************************************
Headquartered in Teaneck, N.J., Lockheed Martin IMS is a leader in
providing sole-source, third-party services to the telecommunications
industry. The company developed the nation's first-of-its-kind Number
Portability Administration Center and Service Management System (NPAC/SMS)
in Chicago. Through this state-of-the-art facility, the company will
provide local number portability services to telephone companies in the
Midwest, the Mid-Atlantic, the Northeast and the Southwest regions. Local
number portability allows customers to keep their existing telephone number
if they switch to a new service provider.
For five years, Lockheed Martin IMS also administered the 800-number
telephone number database for the telecommunications industry.
IMS is a subsidiary of global technology leader Lockheed Martin
Corporation (NYSE: LMT), headquartered in Bethesda, Md.
************************************************** *************************************



  #126  
Old March 18th 04, 08:34 PM
*
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Lockheed Aerospace Now Controlling the Telephone Companies World Wide Hoagland a fraud?

On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:44:39 -0600, OM wrote:

On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:07:38 GMT, * wrote:


The point is, Lockheed is controlling the phone companies.


...Yeah, and drugs fried your addled mind.


I don't take drugs, so by your logic the above statement is correct.

And it is.

snip swoon

Lockheed's telephone satellites:
http://spaceflightnow.com/news/0003/01garuda1orbit/

http://www.lmtas.com/contacts/

http://www.npac.com/docs/NeuStar_Pre...ase120199.html

http://www.nanpa.com/

http://www.gis.net/~larrabee/LM****ch.htm

http://telephonyonline.com/ar/teleco...heed/index.htm



http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/st.../335014&EDATE=

Lockheed Martin IMS to Administer North America's Telephone Numbering System

WASHINGTON, Oct. 10 /PRNewswire/ -- Lockheed Martin IMS today announced
that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has issued an order
selecting
the company to serve as the administrator of North America's telephone
numbering system.
While final terms of the agreement are still being negotiated, the
five-year contract is valued at about $25 million. As a neutral,
third-party
provider of telecommunications services, Lockheed Martin IMS will oversee
the
assignment of area codes, three-digit central office codes, carrier
identification codes and other numbering resources throughout the United
States, Canada, Bermuda and much of the Caribbean.
"Number administration is a critical part of North America's
telecommunication industry. The demand for telephone numbers to feed fax
machines, the Internet, cell phones and other new technologies is booming,"
said Jeffrey Ganek, senior vice president and managing director of
communications industry services for Lockheed Martin IMS. "Lockheed Martin
IMS has already assembled a team of highly seasoned, technical professionals
to meet the growing needs of the telecommunications industry, ensure a level
playing field for competitors and enhance the quality of services to phone
customers throughout North America."
In addition to monitoring North America's 225 area codes and more than
180,000 local exchanges, the company will analyze trends within area codes
to
determine when available numbers will be depleted within a code area. It
will
then assist the local phone industry and regulators in proposing relief
plans.
The FCC's selection of Lockheed Martin IMS as the North American
Numbering
Plan Administrator (NANPA) was recommended last May by the North American
Numbering Council.
The project will be headed by Ron Conners, the former director NANPA
administration at Bellcore, who was hired by Lockheed Martin IMS in
September
because of his expertise in number plan administration.

************************************************** ************************************
Headquartered in Teaneck, N.J., Lockheed Martin IMS is a leader in
providing sole-source, third-party services to the telecommunications
industry. The company developed the nation's first-of-its-kind Number
Portability Administration Center and Service Management System (NPAC/SMS)
in Chicago. Through this state-of-the-art facility, the company will
provide local number portability services to telephone companies in the
Midwest, the Mid-Atlantic, the Northeast and the Southwest regions. Local
number portability allows customers to keep their existing telephone number
if they switch to a new service provider.
For five years, Lockheed Martin IMS also administered the 800-number
telephone number database for the telecommunications industry.
IMS is a subsidiary of global technology leader Lockheed Martin
Corporation (NYSE: LMT), headquartered in Bethesda, Md.
************************************************** *************************************



  #127  
Old March 18th 04, 08:39 PM
Rand Simberg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Lockheed Aerospace Now Controlling the Telephone Companies World Wide Hoagland a fraud?

On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:34:42 GMT, in a place far, far away, *
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as
to indicate that:

The point is, Lockheed is controlling the phone companies.


...Yeah, and drugs fried your addled mind.


I don't take drugs


Perhaps you should. Lithium can work wonders, I hear.
  #129  
Old March 19th 04, 05:07 AM
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hoagland a fraud?



Leonard Robinson wrote:


Lowell, however, was part and parcel of the late 19th (Edwardian) Era; his
Mars books became the basis for a number of science fiction writers
(Burroughs' Carter series, much of early Heinlein & Clarke, perhaps del Rey
& Smith).


And "The War of the Worlds" also; H.G. Wells' brother read about the
canals and mentioned the possibility that if the Martian's were that
ancient, their technology would make Earth's armies look pretty backward
by comparison- at this point all the bells and whistles started going
off in H.G.'s head.

Pat

  #130  
Old March 30th 04, 06:20 AM
*
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Malin Hired by NASA/Lockheed to Doctor MOC PHotographs Space Science Double Standard Hoagland a fraud?

On 16 Mar 2004 15:46:34 -0800, (George William
Herbert) wrote:

In article ,
* wrote:
On 16 Mar 2004 15:09:43 -0800,
(George William
Herbert) wrote:

{...}

Again: this is grossly off topic in the sci.space newsgroups
and because of that in violation of your internet service
provider's acceptable use policy. If you keep posting this,
eventually, everyone who normally posts in the sci.space
groups will complain to Earthlink and your account will go poof.


Okay Mr. Arrogant Scientist, why did the scientific community allow this:

NASA never allowed independent scientific peer review of Malin's Mars MOC
photographs and instead allowed Malin to keep and own US government property
which is against the law.



That is a false statement.


No at all, and you're hedging and not being honest. I doubt you're a
scientist at all. Science is supposed to be about honesty.


All the MOC images older than the proprietary period are in
the National Space Science Data Center set, which can be
accessed by the public or independent researchers.


Please explain 'proprietary period' and who owns the photographs during that
period.

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/...1996-062A&ds=*

They are also on Malin's website:

http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery


Why aren't any independent scientists allowed to peer review NASA's raw
data? Why aren't any independent scientists not employed by NASA, Lockheed
or under contract by the same allowed to view the raw Mars MOC data as it is
being transmitted?




-george william herbert


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.