|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
GUTH Venus is way too hot for even Bad Astronomy
"Brad Guth" wrote in message
om In spite of a supposedly dead or rather MI6/NSA corrupted PFS instrument, ESA's VIRTIS (Venus express) mission is gradually returning the necessary goods of their somewhat alternative if not better science than we've previously had to work with. Having more than sufficient IR spectrum and resolution for better determining their ongoing planetology science, with improved capability of establishing the thermal energy balance of Venus is what's downright interesting, in that team VIRTIS has had more than the necessary science instruments at their disposal, yet thus far having been keeping their rather unusually tight butt crack skewed shut about sharing this vital portion of their science. Older probes had previously established roughly a 15% surplus of energy that's leaving Venus than solar contributed, suggesting 20+J/m2 was what the surface of Venus had to offer. Obviously this represents that some of the well established and typically higher elevated tera of the Venus surface could be offering as little as 5 J/m2, while other hot-spots could be inexcess of 50 j/m2 if not greater as suggested again by the much older data obtained by American and Russian probes. Without benefit of the PFS instrument, it'll be difficult to obtain much better surface resolution than several km, and therefore specific hot-spots or zones of whatever's active lava, mud flows or S8/CO2 geothermal forced gas vents will remain as a future obligation of the next round of planetology explorations that'll most likely be those of Russian expertise. Venus EXPRESS is alive, as is the planet and Guth Venus http://mygate.mailgate.org/mynews/sc...=smart&p=1/418 http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...d1acaf293fbe50 "Bookman" wrote in message Is it any surprise, given the Guthball's hatred for science, and fetish for scat? That's certainly abother bigoted and arrogant space-toilet calling a butt nasty. Turn it all around and proceed as to blame others if not kill the messenger(s), and if need be putting the likes of Christ back on that stick is apparently the one and only alternative that such rusemasters have as their Old Testament thumping recourse. There's lots more to appreciate as to how these Usenet MIB spooks and moles have been accomplishing their form of hypology and infomercial crapolla as their damage control thing these days. Obviously I'm not a born-again liar or otherwise the Village idiot that's running amok, because, anyone worth half their salt can have a first hand look-see at exactly what my PC has to offer of Usenet, and as such this Usenet simply isn't always as honest about listing topics as you folks say it is. In fact, without much argument from any soul on Earth, Mailgate/Usenet is clearly worse off at stealth topic/author moderation or even banishment crapolla than GOOGLE/Usenet. GOOGLE's topic/author index update and thus search for as "Sorted by date" isn't doing its usual nifty thing for the likes of "Brad Guth" or "Guth Brad". That's no lie. I'm not at all certain that each Usenet client of a GOOGLE or Mailgate server even gets to review what others have to work with. Most certainly the general public that's not an active Usenet member sees considerably less information than you or I. Like right about now, my PC has been going a little postal via the remote control of others, while Mailgate/Usenet service is in the toilet, and I do believe GOOGLE/usenet is even choking on some of it's own PC/client specific spermware/****ware that's doing all that it possibly can to nail my truth telling butt. Here's yet another new and improved good one for the old topic/author banishment gipper. It seems the MI6/NSA's Skull and Bones infomercial protective hammer is coming down as hard as their warm and fuzzy Third Reich status quo collective of incest cloned and therefore mutated borgs can manage, that is without terminating more of their own kind. GOOGLE has recently modified their Usenet search engine with a 'Brad Guth' robo/stealth moderation factor, as a Usenet interactive and possibly client specific topic/author banishment or GUTH V-chip filter, and to think that's all specifically because of little old me. Imagine that, I've caused our lord almighty GOOGLE to shift gears in mid mainstream status quo. Now whenever searching for whatever's topic new and improved from the land of Guth, oddly I'm not to be found. So, in order to find me and of my latest round of lose cannon contributions, you'll have to utilize other methods that are somewhat less search effective. In other words, "why is Venus so taboo/nondisclosure rated" is actually getting a well focused orchestration of their efforts intended upon nailing my open mindset that's remaining outside of their Old Testament thumping status quo box, of their insisting that Venus is supposedly of the very same planetology vintage as Earth. "Bryan Olson" wrote in message . net Get a clue already. The reason so few respond is not that a planet is "taboo". Who cares what an Apollo-denier says about exploring Venus? GOT PROOF ? (didn't think so) At least not any more so than Muslims had WMD, and look at what a collateral and absolutely bloody fiasco that turned out to be, not to mention at least ten fold more spendy than our actually going to/from that physically dark and nasty moon of ours, and setting up a lunar base camp. - EML1 Considerations / by Rand Simberg http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...5d992607bb0431 In the midst of engaging in some of Guth's nutballery, Wayne Throop was asking about the value of L1. Well, despite Brad's interest in it, there's a lot to be said for it, depending on what you want to do. I'm reposting this from my blog, for those who whine that my posts are too short. Feel free to comment over there as well. What's there to despite or nutballery about utilizing our EML2 or rather MEL1/(moon L1)? The last time I'd checked, the laws of physics haven't changed, and the best of replicated science is roughly the same as it was as of decades ago. Other than the matter of this L1 gravity pit or near micro-g well (a gravity nullification hill if you like) being roughly 95+% solar illuminated from the naked direction of sol, and otherwise getting a healthy load of secondary IR/FIR from the IR reflective and reactive moon itself, thus your halo rbiting or tethered station-keeping is going to require a substantial amount of forced heat exchanging, plus as much shielding depth and/or volumes of h2o or whatever's similar as necessary due to the primary and secondary TBI worth of gamma and hard-X-rays that are almost never passive or otherwise quiet. I'm not at all sure POOF is quite up to this task, but something similar that's a bit more robust unless it's purely robotic should be doable. My LSE-CM/ISS plan of action with its tether dipole element that could safely reach to within 4r of Earth is just Clarke Station on steroids, as rather easily and effectively tethered to the moon for good measure, thus not hardly 10% the monthly reactive station keeping budget, if even 1%. Otherwise, I totally agree with the jest of this topic, that this relatively nearby moon/L1 is offering the absolute best of nearly everything imaginable, including the best of renewable energy, star-wars high ground and being NEO defense capable as Earth is ever going to get, short of having those substantial facilities actually on and/or within the moon itself. - "Joe Strout" wrote in message http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...ceb6b5aa16ebfa Question about hitching a ride on an NEO: I say what's to question. NEOs ott to be similar to walking on our physically dark, salty and extremely IR/FIR hot and naked moon, as well as a little cosmic/solar influx lethal to your DNA. for starters, you'll need an actual proof-tested fly-by-rocket lander with lots of spare fuel for accommodating those fully modulated and fly-by-computer driven reaction thrusters, plus a few of those fairly substantial momentum reaction wheels that's proven to work on your behalf of dealing with maneuvering about such a local mascon that's continually imposing different gravity in most all locations, and don't so much as move an inch or fart, because that'll screw up whatever maneuvers. You'll most likely need whatever's the next best thing to having rad-hard DNA. Besides taking steroids, you'll likely need a healthy cache of banked bone marrow as your plan-B. If you're planning upon any extended NEO stay, as such it might also be a good idea for having a private cache of stem cells, just incase you start going a little blind or something worse. Don't forget to bring along those little tubes of super-glue and lots of ductape for patching them pesky micrometeorite or larger holes. For those Kodak moments, be sure to take along a good optical UV filter, if not a near-UV (425 nm) spectrum cut-off, for taking those pictures that'll otherwise turn out as though somewhat vibrant bluish looking, along with the likes of planets (especially Venus shining itself as brighter than Earth) and even a few stars such as Sirius showing up, as otherwise due to all the raw near-UV, UV-a and the unavoidable secondary/recoil of photons that are derived off anything natural or artificial that's UV/black-light reactive should by rights push whatever's local into getting photo/image recorded as being somewhat extra blue. Instead of photographic film, you need to utilize a robust CCD digital camera with a little extra internal shielding for its CCD of somewhat greater bias current instead of based upon whatever well shielded film that's essentially too easily exposed by such raw/unfiltered energy, some of which being of gamma and hard-X-ray spectrum, and then as always fending off those pesky thermal extremes of being ultra sub-frozen in the shade or by night, to that of having to include the local secondary IR/FIR by day of being summarily roasted from more than one direction. You'll likely need a private cache of Po/210 for neutralizing the highly electrostatic dust. At best you've got hours of EVA upon whatever NEO. On a bad solar day, worse case you're down to minutes to accomplish whatever's the task before reaching your career dosage limit of gamma and hard-X-rays, and don't forget that you still have to get yourself back home w/o further TBI trauma to your frail DNA that's by now most likely past the red-line point of no return of what's humanly survivable without utilizing your banked bone marrow and possibly a few spare grams of those do-everything stem cells. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
GUTH Venus is way too hot for even Bad Astronomy
"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:b2307b30fbf4eeb4cfd9a1802c8c0c62.49644@mygate .mailgate.org Damn few of Usenet members exist as real folks. Usually their real names are as secret or taboo as is most everything else about their supposed existence. So, in my koran there's no harm done by nailing these hocus-pocus posters that keep hiding the truth and otherwise diverting and/or clowning around within a given topic that's serious about a given matter. If you exist as a real person, then it matters, especially if you've been sticking to whatever it is that your mindset represents, whereas being two or three faced as is most often the case, isn't exactly playing fair. Instead of dumping a given topic or sub-topic into Usenet and then never once replying to any of the other topic related contributions, as having been the Usenet norm of what insiders and rusemasters often do (especially of those faith-based contributions), whereas I tend to answer as many of the serious and otherwise silly contributions as possible, especially if it was my topic to begin with. Of interest to further note; GOOGLE/Usenet and Mailgate/Usenet have not been keeping up with their index of showing whatever's most recent. A search for Brad Guth or Guth Brad and using their "Sort by Date" function has become nearly hopeless. I guess answering to others that typically have no honest intentions in the first place is what's ****ing off the troops in charge of how Usenet works, thus imposing moderation as to what the public gets to see is simply the status quo norm, especially effective if you're a Republican or a Democrat Jew that simply votes or otherwise backs whatever's Republican whenever it favors their faith-based ulterior motives. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
GUTH Venus is way too hot for even Bad Astronomy
"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:b2307b30fbf4eeb4cfd9a1802c8c0c62.49644@mygate .mailgate.org I see that our Usenet index has locked out as much user friendly search features that pertains to Brad Guth, at least as much as possible has been accomplished without terminating their ongoing Old Testament thumping ruse/sting of the century. In case you folks haven't quite noticed, the old "Moon Landing a Hoax??!! Real Evidence here" topic is just another prime damage-control example of their intended ruse/sting of our mutually perpetrated cold-war century, that isn't about to end until our fat lady sings, or otherwise as long as we're in the process of taking as much Muslim oil as we can before they ever manage to realize just how dumb and dumber Muslims and Islamics have been snookered all along. Actual facts as based upon actual history is what supersedes science. However, nothing supersedes the laws of physics. Ever since I started in as of 7+ years ago, Venus has been getting more and more taboo/nondisclosure worthy than our moon. This is rather odd, being that there's nothing all that insurmountable about Venus, and at times it's so nearby with the very same moon like face of Venus aligned with Earth. However, on behalf of sticking much closer to our home world that's going GW postal, and otherwise GW Bush postal; If you are surrounded by the bare minimum of 3.14e6 m2 of somewhat significant mass (especially if it's of greater density than water), and if there's next to nothing between yourself and all of that surrounding terrain of naked mass (such as being situated upon our physically dark moon that should by rights be deep in meteorite debris and secondary impact shards of everything solar and cosmic you can think of, including the kitchen sink), whereas the incoming solar and cosmic energy (as often nasty as that may be) is going to unavoidably cause the natural secondary/recoil birth of soft-X-rays, hard-X-rays and gamma radiation like nowhere other. Human DNA as physically protected by a given spacesuit isn't going to buy all that much attenuation of said TBI(total body irradiation) dosage, whereas DNA/RNA damage beyond the point of no return will in short order transpire regardless of whatever infomercial mainstream science as based upon those conditional laws of physics has to say. The status quo of what we've been told will NOT save your sorry moonsuit butt for long, especially if you're standing upon a modus hill and thereby exposed to 314e6 m2 if not just as easily trekking upon much higher terrain that'll buy you 31.4e9 m2 of what's surrounding as physically hot and nasty in more ways than being merely passive solar influx and secondary IR/FIR toasty. Therefore, you simply do not require all that much lethal radiation potential as derived per m2 in order to amount to getting nailed by a truly great deal of what's there to behold. Other than those temporary Chapel Bell deployments on behalf of our NASA/Apollo fiasco, too bad we still have not so much as once established a robotic science platform cruising efficiently within the interactive MEL1/(moon L1) zone that's roughly upon average 58,000 km from the moon's CG, whereas all sorts of moon and Earth science could have been affordably and very nicely accomplished as of four decades ago. Much like a poofy version of Clarke Station, Bigelow’s proposed Nautilus station (aka POOF) simply isn't sufficiently shielded nor configured with an adequate amount of forced heat-exchanging in order to deal with accommodating us humans along with the 95+% solar + 50% lunar secondary/recoil of IR/FIR. However, Venus L2 offers quite another matter that's worth more than a few good arguments on behalf of those POOF configured space depots, whereas frail human DNA can actually survive the 19 month onboard stint better off than the to/from commute. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
GUTH Venus is way too hot for even Bad Astronomy
"The Demon Prince of Absurdity" wrote
in message news So why do you still cling to the oft-refuted conspiracy theory that the Apollo missions were hoaxed, Brad, despite reams of concrete evidence that you consciously choose to ignore? Shhh, he's wanking. You don't want to scare him, or he might, ahem, pull something. Why on Earth do the two of you bed-wetting partners in crimes against humanity care? Is this another Third Reich Jewish thing the two of you incest cloned borgs have got going? - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
GUTH Venus is way too hot for even Bad Astronomy
"SameAsB4" wrote in message
Yours is mostly Goodwill Science. I suppose others of your hocus-pocus kind being such Goodwill liars is an important task. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
GUTH Venus is way too hot for even Bad Astronomy
"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:b2f68fcdc3351286a2b7e5f92756d8bd.49644@mygate .mailgate.org Now we can't hardly tell the regular Usenet clowns from the Jesus freaks. Faith Based Scientists Paranoid About Possible Mars Life http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...896e49a36ea6d3 http://mygate.mailgate.org/mynews/sc...rg?order=smart "Jim" wrote in message Seems so, although I don't feel as passionately about it as you seem to. What's this silly flashback? But you're the one having agreed there's smart ETs out there, doing their God like intelligent design and therefore terraforming thing none the less. So, let stick with that notion, instead of going off-topic so as to making whatever faith based religion look as though any better off than another. Yes, intelligent design is what its all about. One of our prophets wrote that "the glory of God is intelligence. The thing with Hitler is that he chose to "improve" the gene pool by murdering those whom he thought to be inferior. That was also the plan all along by his Jewish partners in crimes against humanity. Of course, we humans have been rather good at exterminating one another at a fairly alarming rate, especially at the most recent global energy domination dirty hands and pecker of our resident born-again LLPOF warlord(GW Bush). Personally, I would stop way short of putting President Bush in the same league as Hitler. As you know, I wouldn't. I don't know about your mormon self, but I happen to like most Islamic/Muslim types better than many other faith based souls that seem more into be born-again and thus more likely pagan than not. I am a proponent of genetic engineering, as long as it is overseen by a body of experts. Genetic engineering has already shown great promise in the medical arena. As a Registered Nurse, this is the area of GE with which I am most familiar. Whatever you and others of your kind do, don't stop the GE train, as we'll be in need of as much GE as our magnetosphere continues to fail us at the rate of 0.05%/year, and especially as we venture off-world is what goes without question that we'll need an expedited evolution of obtaining either rad-hard DNA or having a cache of stem cells and banked bone marrow in order to survive those to/from treks, worse yet if walking moonsuit butt naked on our very own nearby moon. Yes our environment is constantly changing. Please remember though, we didn't even have proof of our magnetosphere until the late '50s, so that science is reletively young. The shrinkage we are seeing now could be part of a cyclic activity. Perhaps a 100 or 200 year cycle of expansion and retraction. Patience and study are indeed virtues. Having said that, I have a great deal of concern about the effect of "progress" on our envrionment. What is troubling is that we have done much to clean up emmisions (much more is needed), yet we are just now seeing the manifestation of the effects of greenhouse gases. Again, meterological record keeping is in its infancy, and I am not sure what the data truly mean. Is the warming part of a cycle or an effect of pollutants. That is why I am concerned about kneejerk reactions to current events. We are still waiting for California to fall into the ocean. Unless you don't believe in the regular laws of physics, our somewhat recently obtained moon has been the primary GW culprit, and then it's a little of what we've accomplished, and thirdly it's the sun doing it's usual thing of gradually going postal. With each applied kgf = 9.80665 joules, the orbital influence upon all that's Earth by way of our extremely large, massive and nearby moon is 2e20 J. At the very least some of that energy gets converted into heat via tidal friction that's directly associated with our atmosphere, oceans and the internal movements of the Earth that's below our dumbfounded two left feet. 0.001% of 2e20 j/m2 = 3.91 j/m2 that's in some way or another distributed upon/within the average surface of Earth. Obviously the equator receives the vast majority of that lunar/tidal energy, and the north/south poles receive the least in direct benefit. I'm excluding upon the secondary/recoil worth of lunar IR/FIR because it's still so taboo/nonmdisclosure to even talk about, and otherwise even though our moon's IR/FIR albedo is fairly high (roughly 0.33~0.5), our moon's IR/FIR most likely isn't worth 1% of what the gravity/tidal influence has to offer. Moon's tidal energy, upon average at 0.001% = 3.91 j/m2 Us humans at one kj/soul = 6.7e12 joules = 13.1 mj/m2 Mother Earth at getting rid of 40 TJ = 78.25 mj/m2 Just for argument sake, isn't the moon actually worth 39.1 j/m2 ? I happen to believe in the regular laws of physics, and in the thermal dynamics that's derived from good old friction and the unavoidable transferring of such energy about and within our globe, whereas my best swag as to our moon's tidal affects upon Earth is leaning closer to if not greater than 0.01%, therefore we're talking about a continuous 39.1 j/m2, and at best our combined (all inclusive) human influence or environmental impact simply isn't worth much greater than 10% of that amount (as that's 298.5 kj/soul), therefore perhaps humanity isn't worth but 1% of the total GW package. So, you can cry all you want about whatever humanity did or didn't do to mother Earth, and global warming will unavoidably continue, though without our help at merely a slightly reduced rate, and that's even if every polluting and energy consuming soul on this planet were removed. Sorry about that. We have fossils from Mars, do we not? Possibly, although there's still nothing as having been replicated as to that degree of science. That rock could just as easily have come from our moon, or from Venus. So I would not be amazed to see microbes from Venus. Sentient? Probably not. Possible? Sure. Then apparently you don't believe in the regular laws of physics. Gees, would you make up your faith based minset. Absoultly, recorded history, (the Bible?) is silent about what happend before the "first seven days". We have no idea what happened before Genesis 1:1, and no idea how long between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2, so anything could have happened to help the Earth come to be as it is known today. I know I lean to religon alot, but that is where it is at for me. One of our Articles of Faith states: "We believe the Bible to be the Word of God as far as it is translated correctly; we also believe The Book of Mormon to be the Word of God. There's actually lots of intelligent recorded stuff BEFORE the bible, that which fails to mention upon the moon, or of their intelligent survival critical environment which seems not to include significant tides or any of those pesky summer/winter seasons. It's as though early Earth, as we've barely known it since the last ice age, had previously been w/o moon. Do you even have any foggy faith based idea as to what "w/o moon" represents? We place more faith in the latter day scriptures (scriptrures other than the Bible). The difference being that the Bible has been translated many times, also it is incomplete, the good King James' compilers picked and chose which books would be included or excluded. Besides various exclusions in order to best fit the faith based mindset of the day, as such it is also not an accurate record, is it. The Book of Mormon, on the other hand, has only been translated once. In addition other scripture and reveliation is recorded and used (Doctrine and Covenents, and Pearl of Great Price. Additionally sermons, writings, visions etc are recorded and considered to be on a par with scripture). These scriptures indicate that e.t. life exists, and the "natural processes", of which I previously mentioned, are at work endlessly evolving into new worlds and life forms ranging from microbes to sentient creatures. I have no objections nor serious problems with what you've just said, but does that make each and every other Mormon word 100% that of God? (of course not, because as humans with genetic greed, arrogance and bigotry within our DNA code, we do like to fool around and otherwise kid ourselves from time to time) I would be very interested in your information about Venus and other planets, moons, asteroids... whatever So, stop with all of this talking about God or mormon whatever, and start talking about our moon, Venus or even Sirius seems worth a few faith based words of science. Or were you like all the others, just kidding around? The Mormons have, like the Jews, have suffered persecution, predjuice and tribulation since their inception. Jesus Christ came first to nation of Israel, and they rejected him and indeed crucified him. I hope I would have behaved differently had I been around then. After his resurrection he appeared to the tribe of Joseph which had migrated to the American continent (central america). Concurrently he charged the Apostles in Israel to take the message to the Gentiles. As I am sure you know, the Church kind of waned after the death of the apostles until the early 1800's. So Christ was crucified by his own people, but rejected by most all others til the early 1800's. Paul stated that when we sin we crucify Christ again and again. But no, the Mormons are a gathering people, we don't reject anyone out of hand. I will have to check into the Cathers, do you mean Catholics? No, I meant "Cathars", as it was the Catholics that essentially mass exterminated those otherwise intelligent and relatively nice Cathars, just like Hitler and his Jewish partners in crimes against humanity did to anyone they didn't like, once again, including those of their own kind. BTW; you're not a very will informed Mormon if you still haven't heard about the demise of all those Cathars. I think it was what gave the likes of Hitler the basic notion that such dastardly atrocities were not only doable but, like the Catholics and the Jews before then, you could get away with such. - Calling "Jim in Houston"; you seem to have vanished into less than thin air again, or is that another one of those pesky Mormon things? You can't possibly be as intellectually dumb and dumber as you and your kind pretend (such as not knowing about the absolutely horrific carnage of those innocent Cathars at the command of that perverted Catholic Pope of their unfortunate day), or otherwise as not to realize upon the vast implications of what my research has to offer science and humanity (possibly even the salvation of our environment). You also can't possibly fail to realize the total worth of our establishing control of and holding onto our moon's L1, as you and others of your kind pretend such is of no importance whatsoever. You can't possibly be even remotely human and not appreciate the implications of there having been other intelligent life (ETs or possibly Cathars if you'd care name names) coexisting on Venus. Therefore, you're either having to admit to being totally snookered by those having "the right stuff", and/or otherwise honestly dumbfounded by way of all of this, or else having to admit that you're one of the collective liars/rusemasters (like Jay Windley) that are in charge of keeping those mutually perpetrated cold-war lids on tight, while otherwise promoting the ongoing pillaging and raping of mother Earth for all she's worth, and then some. It sounds as though you and Jay Windley want to have your mormon cake and to eat it too, to having Earth exactly as it is without ever a stitch of remorse or consideration on behalf of the way it could have become. Which is it? Are you an open mindset good guy or actually a closed mindset bad guy that's merely pretending at being something other, as per the usual as far as I can discover. I hope you're not revising your previous statements, by suggesting that Mormons as a whole are actually just as intellectually skewed and faith-based snookered and thus dumbfounded into being as bad and ugly as are those Old Testament thumpers that sucked up to the likes of those nice Romans, then Hitler and now Bush, and/or every bit as bad off as a few other pagan heathens that also haven't a stitch of remorse. Should we revise history in order to reflect the truth, or simply allow the mainstream status quo and of their essentially getting away with their past and ongoing collateral damage and carnage of the innocent, as to carry on as though the past and therefore the present nor future doesn't really matter as long as you're on the winning side? - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
GUTH Venus is way too hot for even Bad Astronomy
Brad Guth wrote: "Brad Guth" wrote in message news:b2f68fcdc3351286a2b7e5f92756d8bd.49644@mygate .mailgate.org Now we can't hardly tell the regular Usenet clowns from the Jesus freaks. Faith Based Scientists Paranoid About Possible Mars Life Nothing to be paranoid about -- life on Mars, that is -- it's just there and needs to be 'examined'. See: http://stardot.blogspot.com/ tomcat |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
GUTH Venus is way too hot for even Bad Astronomy
"tomcat" wrote in message
ups.com It's actually their bloody faith based shadows that they're so deathly afraid of, as they should be. BTW; pull a full terrestrial vacuum on your freezer, having it loaded with mostly dry-ice/CO2, then TBI the interior of that frosty realm with loads of gamma and hard-X-rays for millions of years before telling us about the supposed terrestrial microbe/spore life that's within that sub-frozen storage box that we'll call Mars. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GUTH Venus is way too hot for even Bad Astronomy | Brad Guth | History | 2 | January 6th 07 10:09 PM |
GUTH Venus is way too hot for even Bad Astronomy | Brad Guth | History | 2 | January 5th 07 12:22 AM |
GUTH Venus is way too hot for even Bad Astronomy | Brad Guth | Astronomy Misc | 2 | January 5th 07 12:22 AM |
GUTH Venus is way too hot for even Bad Astronomy | Brad Guth | SETI | 2 | January 5th 07 12:22 AM |
GUTH Venus is way too hot for even Bad Astronomy | Brad Guth | History | 2 | March 12th 05 04:43 PM |