|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt30 Titius Bode Rule quantized #373 Atom Totality 4th ed
Chapter 30 Titius Bode Rule in Atom Totality
Subject: mean density of planets and satellites I need to include the three planets Uranus, Neptune and Pluto. And I would argue that Pluto is the next planet beyond Neptune since its distance spacing of 5 + 6^2 = 41 and actual 39.4 Au. So my formula would give 6 + 7^2 = 55 as the next planet beyond Pluto. So is there such a astro-body? Sun, average density 1.4 gm/cm^3 but core is 150 gm/cm^3 and where core is equal to about 0.2 solar radii MEAN DENSITIES Mercury, 5.4 gm/cm^3, metal core is 42% of volume Venus, 5.2 gm/cm^3, metallic core Earth, 5.5 gm/cm^3, metal core 17% volume Moon, 3.3 gm/cm^3, iron core Mars, 3.9 gm/cm^3, iron sulfide core --------- Jupiter, 1.3 gm/cm^3, rocky core that is 12-45 Earth mass and 3 to 15% of Jupiter's total mass Saturn, 0.7 gm/cm^3, (less dense than water), rocky core 9 to 22 times Earth mass Uranus, 1.2 gm/cm^3, rock core Neptune, 1.6 gm/cm^3, rock core of iron, nickel, silicates Pluto, 2.1 gm/cm^3, rock core -------- Satellites of Jupiter: Io, 3.5 gm/cm^3, iron core Europa, 3.0 gm/cm^3, iron core Ganymede, 1.9 gm/cm^3, Fe and FeS iron core Callisto, 1.8 gm/cm^3, silicate core _____ Saturn satellite Titan, 1.8 gm/cm^3 silicate core I have this feeling that the proof of the Atom Totality theory is easiest and best done here in our own backyard. Backyard meaning our Solar System. People, even highly trained scientists are suspicious of "proof from far-away." Stars and galaxies lightyears away, have a tougher time of convincing us of the truth of the universe. But when we have proof in our Solar System, that the Nebular Dust Cloud NDC theory could not possibly give the cores of the planets and satellites and give their distance spacings. And that is really good proof. If the NDC theory cannot explain our Solar System but that the Dirac new-radioactivities does explain our Solar System, means that the Atom Totality theory is the true theory. Subject: Kuiper belt and exoplanets fitting into AP-Titius-Bode rule So here is the old Titius Bode Rule (0 + 4)/10 = 0.4 for Mercury (in Au) (3 + 4)/10 = 0.7 for Venus (6 + 4)/10 = 1.0 for Earth .. .. .. Here is the newest AP-Titius-Bode Rule which applies only to CellWell2 of Jupiter and beyond, whereas the old Titius Bode Rule really only applied to the inner planets and the moons of Jupiter. 1 + 2^2 = 5 for Jupiter (in Au) 2 + 3^2 = 11 for Saturn 3 + 4^2 = 19 for Uranus 4 + 5^2 = 29 for Neptune 5 + 6^2 = 41 for Pluto 6 + 7^2 = 55 for Kuiper Belt 7 + 8^2 = 71 Now I looked to see how well matched those numbers are with actual distances, and they match far better than the old Titius-Bode Rule. And I took the curiousity of looking to see if the exoplanets of the last decade follow either one of these Rules: Here is what I found in Wikipedia on exoplanet distances: ---from Wikipedia--- 2008, OGLE-2006-BLG-109Lb and OGLE-2006-BLG-109Lc On February 14, the discovery of the, until now, most similar Jupiter- Saturn planetary system constellation was announced, with the ratios of mass, distance to their star and orbiting time similar to that of Jupiter-Saturn. 2008; HR 8799 Their masses and separation are approximately 10 MJ @ 24 AU, 10 MJ @ 38 AU and 7 MJ @ 68 AU. List of extrasolar planets Centaurus at 173 light years away "planet b" has 41 Au Cancer at 40.9 light years away "planet d" has 5.77 Au --- end of data from Wikipedia--- What I see in the data of exoplanet orbits is that most of them are Jupiter sized planets orbiting a star closer than what Mercury orbits the Sun. This tells me that the pattern or fate of Stellar Systems is one of which a star eventually swallows up all of its planets. Whether they become a binary star system or whether a solo star grows much bigger in the process of swallowing up. So eventually our Sun will have Jupiter orbiting close in, and far closer than what Mercury is orbiting now. Whether our Sun will have a binary companion star, or whether our Sun will swallow up all its planets and just grow bigger. It would certainly cast light on the fact that we seem to be alone in the Cosmos, since we have never been able to contact alien intelligence. That no lifeform is able to escape its solar system and gets swallowed up in the process. Also, if that speculation is true that civilizations get swallowed by their own star would be food for thought for humanity, as to the question of how long does humanity want to live? Do we want to go out at the first signs of hardship, or do we want to last for as long as possible? If we want to last for as long as possible then we would have to start to prepare for making colonies out into the Kuiper Belt or beyond. So if we as a civilization, cannot even get our act together on human overpopulation, nuclear war, and global warming, well, when things get tough and hot, we are going to be swallowed by the Sun early on. Now I need to look up the Tifft quantized galaxy positions or speeds. I need to see if those Tifft quantizations follows a square pattern as in the above Jupiter pattern or whether the Tifft pattern is a pure doubling or halving and not a squaring. I seem to remember it was a doubling pattern. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chapt30 Titius Bode Rule quantized #372 Atom Totality 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 16th 11 07:05 PM |
Chap30 Titius Bode Rule #371 Atom Totality 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 16th 11 07:25 AM |
Kuiper belt and exoplanets fitting into AP-Titius-Bode rule; #151;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | August 18th 09 11:05 PM |
moons of Jupiter also follow Titius Bode Rule; #147; 3rd ed; AtomTotality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | August 16th 09 06:31 PM |
was AP the first to say the Titius Bode Rule was Quantum Mechanics?#143; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 13th 09 08:21 AM |