A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » UK Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why are there 360º in a circle?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old July 8th 06, 10:04 PM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
Peter Sheppard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Why are there 360º in a circle?

You can count to six with one hand.

Clever people can count as far as 31 on one hand ;-)



When I show my kids that, they double over laughing when I get to four.

:-(


What about 390 on two hands...?


  #12  
Old July 9th 06, 12:39 AM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
Father Haskell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 118
Default Why are there 360º in a circle?

m wrote:
Hello!,
I know this is probably a silly question for you,
but why are there 360º in a circle?, has it anything
to do with astronomy?


Probably it was just an arbitrary pick, but it does
make it easy to divide a circle evenly by a wide
variety of integers.

  #13  
Old July 9th 06, 02:22 AM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
Jeff R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 22
Default Why are there 360º in a circle?


"Peter Sheppard" wrote in message
...
You can count to six with one hand.

Clever people can count as far as 31 on one hand ;-)



When I show my kids that, they double over laughing when I get to four.

:-(


What about 390 on two hands...?


I am never so vulgar - or at least aggressive.
(it hurts my fingers)

--
Jeff R.
(and let's not mention 11-bit bytes)


  #14  
Old July 9th 06, 10:28 PM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
Dr John Stockton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 52
Default Why are there 360º in a circle?

JRS: In article .com
, dated Mon, 3 Jul 2006 09:19:38 remote, seen in news:uk.sci.astronomy,
m posted :
I know this is probably a silly question for you,
but why are there 360º in a circle?, has it anything
to do with astronomy?


It is ascribed by Peter Kemp to Pythagoras; and by Norman Feather to
Ptolemy of Alexandria.

NF says that the early Chinese had 365 1/4 degrees in a circle - an
obvious astronomical link. The Chaldeans used sexagesimal arithmetic,
and thus 360 is a reasonable rationalisation; probably 0.1 deg would
have been inconveniently small.

It ties in with the Babylonian division of the day.

--
© John Stockton, Surrey, UK. Turnpike v4.00 MIME. ©
Web URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - w. FAQish topics, links, acronyms
PAS EXE etc : URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/programs/ - see 00index.htm
Dates - miscdate.htm moredate.htm js-dates.htm pas-time.htm critdate.htm etc.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Bible: Cosmologically Correct! Larry Wilson Misc 32 January 12th 06 11:41 PM
Bible far ahead of ancient astronomers! Larry Wilson UK Astronomy 65 January 5th 06 05:06 AM
CRACK THIS CODE!!! NASA CAN'T zetasum Space Shuttle 0 February 3rd 05 12:27 AM
Help: Slipping RA circle on EQ3-2 Mark Robertson UK Astronomy 4 September 10th 04 08:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.