A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

If Gravity Slows Times...Can It Stop Time?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 6th 04, 07:49 PM
Benign Vanilla
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If Gravity Slows Times...Can It Stop Time?

I've read that time is slowed by large gravitational fields. Is it valid
then, to say that an area with massive gravity could stop time, or slow it
to a speed that provides the appearance of stoppage? If I were to fall into
a black hole, the closer I got to the singularity, the slower I would
perceive time, so as I got right up against it...maybe time would move so
slowly from my frame of reference that it takes me "forever" to experience
my death.

--
BV.
www.iheartmypond.com



  #2  
Old April 6th 04, 08:09 PM
Greg Neill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Benign Vanilla" wrote in message
...
I've read that time is slowed by large gravitational fields. Is it valid
then, to say that an area with massive gravity could stop time, or slow it
to a speed that provides the appearance of stoppage? If I were to fall

into
a black hole, the closer I got to the singularity, the slower I would
perceive time, so as I got right up against it...maybe time would move so
slowly from my frame of reference that it takes me "forever" to experience
my death.


For the observer within the field, or approaching
the speed of light, time does not appear to be
any different for him. It's the external observer
who sees the slowing of time for the one in the
field, or moving at great velocity.

No amount of gravity will stop time for the observer
located in its grip (that said, all bets are off at
the singularity itself).


  #3  
Old April 6th 04, 09:19 PM
Benign Vanilla
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Greg Neill" wrote in message
. ..
"Benign Vanilla" wrote in message
...
I've read that time is slowed by large gravitational fields. Is it valid
then, to say that an area with massive gravity could stop time, or slow

it
to a speed that provides the appearance of stoppage? If I were to fall

into
a black hole, the closer I got to the singularity, the slower I would
perceive time, so as I got right up against it...maybe time would move

so
slowly from my frame of reference that it takes me "forever" to

experience
my death.


For the observer within the field, or approaching
the speed of light, time does not appear to be
any different for him. It's the external observer
who sees the slowing of time for the one in the
field, or moving at great velocity.

No amount of gravity will stop time for the observer
located in its grip (that said, all bets are off at
the singularity itself).


That is a KEY fact that I didn't include in my question. Thanks for pointing
out the problem. Now how about this...

I am in a spaceship that has been sucked into a black hole. The Swedish
Bikini team is orbiting the BH, and has a special camera that allows them to
watch me fall towards the singularity. From their frame of reference outside
of mine, time will appear to slow dramatically. So will they be tortured for
eons watching me slowly fall towards impending death?

--
BV.
www.iheartmypond.com



  #4  
Old April 6th 04, 09:49 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

BV This post is behind the times . Bert

  #5  
Old April 6th 04, 09:57 PM
md
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Benign Vanilla" wrote in message
...

"Greg Neill" wrote in message
. ..
"Benign Vanilla" wrote in message
...
I've read that time is slowed by large gravitational fields. Is it valid
then, to say that an area with massive gravity could stop time, or slow

it
to a speed that provides the appearance of stoppage? If I were to fall

into
a black hole, the closer I got to the singularity, the slower I would
perceive time, so as I got right up against it...maybe time would move

so
slowly from my frame of reference that it takes me "forever" to

experience
my death.


For the observer within the field, or approaching
the speed of light, time does not appear to be
any different for him. It's the external observer
who sees the slowing of time for the one in the
field, or moving at great velocity.

No amount of gravity will stop time for the observer
located in its grip (that said, all bets are off at
the singularity itself).


That is a KEY fact that I didn't include in my question. Thanks for pointing
out the problem. Now how about this...

I am in a spaceship that has been sucked into a black hole. The Swedish
Bikini team is orbiting the BH, and has a special camera that allows them to
watch me fall towards the singularity. From their frame of reference outside
of mine, time will appear to slow dramatically. So will they be tortured for
eons watching me slowly fall towards impending death?


no, they will see you disappear behind the horizon.


  #6  
Old April 6th 04, 11:01 PM
Jonathan Silverlight
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , md
writes

"Benign Vanilla" wrote in message
...

"Greg Neill" wrote in message
. ..
"Benign Vanilla" wrote in message
...
I've read that time is slowed by large gravitational fields. Is it valid
then, to say that an area with massive gravity could stop time, or slow

it
to a speed that provides the appearance of stoppage? If I were to fall
into
a black hole, the closer I got to the singularity, the slower I would
perceive time, so as I got right up against it...maybe time would move

so
slowly from my frame of reference that it takes me "forever" to

experience
my death.

For the observer within the field, or approaching
the speed of light, time does not appear to be
any different for him. It's the external observer
who sees the slowing of time for the one in the
field, or moving at great velocity.

No amount of gravity will stop time for the observer
located in its grip (that said, all bets are off at
the singularity itself).


That is a KEY fact that I didn't include in my question. Thanks for pointing
out the problem. Now how about this...

I am in a spaceship that has been sucked into a black hole. The Swedish
Bikini team is orbiting the BH, and has a special camera that allows them to
watch me fall towards the singularity. From their frame of reference outside
of mine, time will appear to slow dramatically. So will they be tortured for
eons watching me slowly fall towards impending death?


no, they will see you disappear behind the horizon.


But isn't the whole point of a black hole that BV's camera cannot exist,
because nothing can pass out of the event horizon?
Though there was a story in Analog magazine a few years ago in which
telepathy is supposed to be some non-physical communication, so it isn't
subject to this. One of a pair of telepaths falls into the hole, and the
other has to "listen" to his/her last scream for the rest of his/her
life (can't remember the genders !)
--
Save the Hubble Space Telescope!
Remove spam and invalid from address to reply.
  #7  
Old April 6th 04, 11:06 PM
Jonathan Silverlight
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Greg Neill
writes
"Benign Vanilla" wrote in message
...
I've read that time is slowed by large gravitational fields. Is it valid
then, to say that an area with massive gravity could stop time, or slow it
to a speed that provides the appearance of stoppage? If I were to fall

into
a black hole, the closer I got to the singularity, the slower I would
perceive time, so as I got right up against it...maybe time would move so
slowly from my frame of reference that it takes me "forever" to experience
my death.


For the observer within the field, or approaching
the speed of light, time does not appear to be
any different for him. It's the external observer
who sees the slowing of time for the one in the
field, or moving at great velocity.

No amount of gravity will stop time for the observer
located in its grip (that said, all bets are off at
the singularity itself).


I've been reading Joao Magueijo's "Faster than the speed of light" and
he has a very different view. You can't pass the horizon, and time
passes more slowly for the observer within the field.
--
Save the Hubble Space Telescope!
Remove spam and invalid from address to reply.
  #8  
Old April 6th 04, 11:44 PM
Greg Neill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jonathan Silverlight" wrote in message
...


I've been reading Joao Magueijo's "Faster than the speed of light" and
he has a very different view. You can't pass the horizon, and time
passes more slowly for the observer within the field.


Indeed. Mr. Magueijo has some non-mainstream ideas.

How could an observer, under any circumstances, measure
his own rate of time passage to be slower or faster?


  #9  
Old April 7th 04, 11:44 AM
md
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jonathan Silverlight" wrote in message
...
In message , md
writes

"Benign Vanilla" wrote in message
...

"Greg Neill" wrote in message
. ..
"Benign Vanilla" wrote in message
...
I've read that time is slowed by large gravitational fields. Is it valid
then, to say that an area with massive gravity could stop time, or slow
it
to a speed that provides the appearance of stoppage? If I were to fall
into
a black hole, the closer I got to the singularity, the slower I would
perceive time, so as I got right up against it...maybe time would move
so
slowly from my frame of reference that it takes me "forever" to
experience
my death.

For the observer within the field, or approaching
the speed of light, time does not appear to be
any different for him. It's the external observer
who sees the slowing of time for the one in the
field, or moving at great velocity.

No amount of gravity will stop time for the observer
located in its grip (that said, all bets are off at
the singularity itself).

That is a KEY fact that I didn't include in my question. Thanks for pointing
out the problem. Now how about this...

I am in a spaceship that has been sucked into a black hole. The Swedish
Bikini team is orbiting the BH, and has a special camera that allows them to
watch me fall towards the singularity. From their frame of reference outside
of mine, time will appear to slow dramatically. So will they be tortured for
eons watching me slowly fall towards impending death?


no, they will see you disappear behind the horizon.


But isn't the whole point of a black hole that BV's camera cannot exist,
because nothing can pass out of the event horizon?


exactly, that's why they see you *disappear* behind the event horizon. At the horizon, gravity
is finite, time is not stopped.


  #10  
Old April 7th 04, 02:12 PM
Benign Vanilla
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
BV This post is behind the times . Bert


Thanks Bert...How's Treb today?

--
BV.
www.iheartmypond.com



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Robert Astronomy Misc 133 August 30th 04 01:31 AM
Earth rotation don findlay Astronomy Misc 122 July 9th 04 07:57 PM
Gas Planets Evolve to be Rock planets??? G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 114 October 16th 03 12:51 PM
Correlation between CMBR and Redshift Anisotropies. The Ghost In The Machine Astronomy Misc 172 August 30th 03 10:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.