|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Dart too sensitive for public release?
"Lord Vain" wrote in
om: Today, NASA has a real interest in automated docking/rendezvouz technology for the 'new' moon program and they're therefore developing it, but the DOD also wants to use it (may even be funding a large part of it) for their hunter-killer satellites but they insist on secrecy. It's pretty obvious that the revealing of the failure could give third parties a good insight how NASA/DOD is tackling the automated docking/rendevouz problem. Nice theory but... the DoD already has its own automated rendezvous/docking program (XSS-11) and it appears to be working better than DART already. So the DART mishap report will give no insight into how DoD is tackling the problem; they're using a completely different system. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dart too sensitive for public release? | Craig Fink | Space Shuttle | 24 | April 24th 06 02:40 PM |
DART mishap report | Pat Flannery | Policy | 3 | December 13th 05 06:52 PM |
DART mishap report | Pat Flannery | History | 3 | December 13th 05 06:52 PM |
Columbia Accident Investigation Board To Release Vols. II-VI of Final Report | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 0 | October 27th 03 01:43 AM |
Final Release of Quasars.Org: 48,215 QSOs and 100,343 QSO candidates | Eric Flesch | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 4th 03 01:08 PM |