Spacetimes of The Universe?????

Start with present spacetime. It is expanding rapidly and getting
almost empty in both micro and macro realms. About 11 billion years
ago this critical expansion rate started to kick in. It is easy for me
to theorize the universe is shaped like a saddle. A spacetime in the
future will see the universe having no matter in it. This is a grim
one,but reality.Its a universe still iof time,and space,but no
physical matter. All this comes knowing galaxies are moving away from
each other at an accelerating rate. That the age of star formation has
slowed way down.That means some future spacetime with no new stars.
Right now white dwarfs are in. Matter particles not being created at
as fast rate as in the past. That means decay into
radiation(ultimatly unstable) My convex space theory puts this
senario into play. So play with it,and let me know what you think?
Its my virtual bithday present to "YOU ALL TreBert

"bert" wrote in message
...
Start with present spacetime. It is expanding rapidly and getting
almost empty in both micro and macro realms. About 11 billion years
ago this critical expansion rate started to kick in. It is easy for me
to theorize the universe is shaped like a saddle.

If the universe were shaped like a saddle it would have to be a hollow
saddle, because everything would have expanded from the center
after the Big Bang.

It makes more sense to say the universe is shaped like a hollow ball.
That is more what you would get after an explosion.

On Feb 9, 6:54*am, bert wrote:
Start with present spacetime. It is expanding rapidly and getting
almost empty in both micro and macro realms. About 11 billion years
ago this critical expansion rate started to kick in.


But if there was an inflationary period near the beginning, then the
universe must have speeded up, slowed down, and then speeded up
again! Who's foot is working the gas pedal?


It is easy for me
to theorize the universe is shaped like a saddle.


Why? So God can ride?


A spacetime in the
future will see the universe having no matter in it.


The protons will decay? Hasn't been proven yet that they do.


This is a grim
one,but reality.Its a universe still iof time,and space,but no
physical matter.


But then we can't be there, so the universe can't see itself!


*All this comes knowing galaxies are moving away from
each other at an accelerating rate. That the age of star formation has
slowed way down.That means some future spacetime with no new stars.
Right now white dwarfs are in. *Matter particles not being created at
as fast rate as in the past. *That means decay into
radiation(ultimatly unstable) * My convex space theory puts this
senario into play. So play with it,and let me know what you think?
Its my virtual bithday present to "YOU ALL * * * TreBert


A saddle does not close on itself. Implies infinite space. Does not
imply a Big Bang beginning.

Happy Birthday!

Double-A

On Feb 9, 6:44*pm, Double-A wrote:
On Feb 9, 6:54*am, bert wrote:

Start with present spacetime. It is expanding rapidly and getting
almost empty in both micro and macro realms. About 11 billion years
ago this critical expansion rate started to kick in.

But if there was an inflationary period near the beginning, then the
universe must have speeded up, slowed down, and then speeded up
again! * Who's foot is working the gas pedal?

It is easy for me
to theorize the universe is shaped like a saddle.

Why? *So God can ride?

A spacetime in the
future will see the universe having no matter in it.

The protons will decay? *Hasn't been proven yet that they do.

This is a grim
one,but reality.Its a universe still iof time,and space,but no
physical matter.

But then we can't be there, so the universe can't see itself!

*All this comes knowing galaxies are moving away from
each other at an accelerating rate. That the age of star formation has
slowed way down.That means some future spacetime with no new stars.
Right now white dwarfs are in. *Matter particles not being created at
as fast rate as in the past. *That means decay into
radiation(ultimatly unstable) * My convex space theory puts this
senario into play. So play with it,and let me know what you think?
Its my virtual bithday present to "YOU ALL * * * TreBert

A saddle does not close on itself. *Implies infinite space. *Does not
imply a Big Bang beginning.

Happy Birthday!

Double-A

Double A Thanks I have stated my age at 82 all year so now that I am
82 I do not feel I got older. Age can be a state of mind.Old and ugly
am I but glad when I wake up and find I am alive go figure Universe
having a saddle shape tells me it has a negative curve,or open .As you
know Double A I like curves,and so does Pee-Air TreBert