|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#441
|
|||
|
|||
Time to Think ?Horizontal? for Future Space Launches
On Dec 15, 6:56*am, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article c2d1643d-7f75-405d-a478- , says... Jeff is actually a NASA/DARPA kinda guy, whereas anything they do or don't do is perfectly fine and dandy by his way of thinking. * B.S. *I was against Ares I and Ares V from day one. *Ares I, in particular, was the stupidest idea for a crew launch vehicle in the history of manned spaceflight and I'm happy to see it die! Your actions seem to prove otherwise. You seem to love everything about our DARPA and NASA, as though they alone must remain in charge and the final authority as to whatever other can or can not do. I've been a supporter of commercial cargo and commercial crew to/from ISS from day one as well. *It's time to get NASA out of the "routine" part of spaceflight, which is to and from LEO, so HOPEFULLY NASA can focus on bigger and better things, like developing in space refueling technologies, aerospike engines, and etc. There's nothing currently within NASA that's capable of accomplishing a damn thing. Most if not all of those Zionist Nazis that got us the Saturn V have long since flown the coop (so to speak), and apparently they trained not another soul of how such terrific fly-by-rocket things should be done. NASA needs to be reformed into a more NACA like agency. *It should be developing the technologies which enable commercial space to thrive. *It should not be in competition with commercial space. *It needs to get out of the way of commercial space. That means I really don't want to see any more NASA developed launch vehicles. *Unfortunately, US politics says otherwise. Jeff -- 42 Then why not pull the plugs (just like JFK was planning to do) and if need be shut it down entirely, as well as cutting all previous and current retirements and those nifty benefits by 50%, because we really can't afford those either. When a private sector corporation screws up and goes belly up, and pretty much dissolves and/or liquidates everything is considered as accepted by the public as a final solution, then why not have the same outcome and closure for those of our dysfunctional NASA? It's not as though other nations don't offer reliable and more affordable options. Even our USAF has gotten better and cheaper than anything our NASA has to offer. ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Time travel into the future | Hannu Poropudas | Astronomy Misc | 3 | July 20th 07 02:58 PM |
NASA Announces Future Shuttle Launches Will Be Sudden And Without Warning | rk | Space Shuttle | 0 | January 12th 06 05:58 AM |
Aliens = human time travellers from the future !!! | nightbat | Misc | 1 | December 19th 05 01:43 PM |
Time to put the Space Shuttle painlessly to sleep .... and return to SPACE work that's got a future ! | Alec | Space Station | 0 | August 13th 05 08:10 PM |
Time to put the Space Shuttle painlessly to sleep .... and return to SPACE work that's got a future ! | Alec | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 13th 05 08:08 PM |