|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
StrongNuclear confined to nucleus AND, gravity confined to electron-space region; Huchra & Geller is outline of Atom Totality
|
#152
|
|||
|
|||
whether Sloan Great Wall and Great Wall are contiguous This Logical Check or Test lack of applying logic in physics theory Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate
a_plutonium wrote: http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~huchra/zcat/ One sees a great wall of galaxies. This looks much like the p-orbital dots which are dense near the nucleus and sparse further away. So a Great-Wall of galaxies becomes really that of where the "nucleus of the Atom Totality" lies. P.S. I have to review that catalog for I am not sure if the Great Wall is circular. Or at least whether the Southern and Northern hemisphere shows the pattern. Anyway, I said in earlier posts that the catalog of Huchra and Geller should be placed into a supercomputer where the computer is assigned the task of making the galactic distribution into a ultimate uniform pattern. And then working backwards-- adjust our laws and forces of physics so that the perfect pattern is the reality and our laws and forces need to be altered to fit that perfect pattern. Well I have taken the liberty of quoting what Wikipedia says about the Great Wall: --- quoting Wikipedia on Great Wall --- Great Wall (astronomy) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search This article is about the CfA2 Great Wall. For the Sloan Great Wall, see Sloan Great Wall The Great Wall, sometimes more specifically referred to as the CfA2 Great Wall, is the second largest known super-structure in the Universe. It is a filament of galaxies approximately 200 million light-years away and has dimensions which measure over 500 million light-years long, 300 million light-years wide and only 15 million light-years thick. It was discovered in 1989 by Margaret Geller and John Huchra based on redshift survey data from the CfA Redshift Survey[1]. It is not known how much further the wall extends due to the plane of the Milky Way galaxy in which Earth is located. The gas and dust from the Milky Way obscures astronomers' view and have so far made it impossible to determine if the wall ends or continues on further than they can currently observe. It is hypothesized that such structures as the Great Wall form along and follow web-like strings of dark matter. It is thought that this dark matter dictates the structure of the Universe on the grandest of scales. Dark matter gravitationally attracts normal matter, and it is this normal matter that astronomers see forming long thin walls of Super-Galactic clusters. The largest known cosmic structure is the Sloan Great Wall, discovered in 2003 in data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey; it is about a billion light-years away, and about 1.4 billion light-years in length. --- end quoting --- This maybe crucial to the Atom Totality theory as to whether the Sloan Great Wall is contiguous to the Great Wall. For the Atom Totality would say the dots of the electron-dot-cloud, the galaxies, are dense near the nucleus and become sparse and rare the further away you go. So if the Atom Totality theory is correct then you cannot have say density of galaxies punctuated with spans of sparseness. A dense number of galaxies near the nucleus and a uniform sparsing and rarity to the galactic numbers the further away from the nucleus. Now I cannot tell from the readings above whether the Sloan Great Wall is nearby the Great Wall. It does say that the Sloan Great Wall is a billion light years away whereas the Great Wall is 200 million light years away. So that is in agreement with the Atom Totality theory. Also, I want to point out that the 5f6 orbital of plutonium has various solutions to the Schrodinger Equation where there is a sort of picture of the 6 lobes and a sort of steering wheel type geometry near the nucleus of a node which would appear like a "void of galaxies". So it could be that the Sloan Great Wall is interior to these node of the 5f6 and the Great Wall is exterior to this node. It would be nice if someone created a 3-d model of what Huchra and Geller cataloged. These 2-d models are better than nothing but leave a lot to be desired. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
whether Sloan Great Wall and Great Wall are contiguous This Logical Check or Test lack of applying logic in physics theory Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay
a_plutonium wrote: (snipped) http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~huchra/zcat/ Well I have taken the liberty of quoting what Wikipedia says about the Great Wall: --- quoting Wikipedia on Great Wall --- Great Wall (astronomy) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search This article is about the CfA2 Great Wall. For the Sloan Great Wall, see Sloan Great Wall The Great Wall, sometimes more specifically referred to as the CfA2 Great Wall, is the second largest known super-structure in the Universe. It is a filament of galaxies approximately 200 million light-years away and has dimensions which measure over 500 million light-years long, 300 million light-years wide and only 15 million light-years thick. It was discovered in 1989 by Margaret Geller and John Huchra based on redshift survey data from the CfA Redshift Survey[1]. It is not known how much further the wall extends due to the plane of the Milky Way galaxy in which Earth is located. The gas and dust from the Milky Way obscures astronomers' view and have so far made it impossible to determine if the wall ends or continues on further than they can currently observe. It is hypothesized that such structures as the Great Wall form along and follow web-like strings of dark matter. It is thought that this dark matter dictates the structure of the Universe on the grandest of scales. Dark matter gravitationally attracts normal matter, and it is this normal matter that astronomers see forming long thin walls of Super-Galactic clusters. The largest known cosmic structure is the Sloan Great Wall, discovered in 2003 in data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey; it is about a billion light-years away, and about 1.4 billion light-years in length. --- end quoting --- This maybe crucial to the Atom Totality theory as to whether the Sloan Great Wall is contiguous to the Great Wall. For the Atom Totality would say the dots of the electron-dot-cloud, the galaxies, are dense near the nucleus and become sparse and rare the further away you go. So if the Atom Totality theory is correct then you cannot have say density of galaxies punctuated with spans of sparseness. A dense number of galaxies near the nucleus and a uniform sparsing and rarity to the galactic numbers the further away from the nucleus. Now I cannot tell from the readings above whether the Sloan Great Wall is nearby the Great Wall. It does say that the Sloan Great Wall is a billion light years away whereas the Great Wall is 200 million light years away. So that is in agreement with the Atom Totality theory. Also, I want to point out that the 5f6 orbital of plutonium has various solutions to the Schrodinger Equation where there is a sort of picture of the 6 lobes and a sort of steering wheel type geometry near the nucleus of a node which would appear like a "void of galaxies". So it could be that the Sloan Great Wall is interior to these node of the 5f6 and the Great Wall is exterior to this node. It would be nice if someone created a 3-d model of what Huchra and Geller cataloged. These 2-d models are better than nothing but leave a lot to be desired. My explanation above was not clear. So let me try to make clear to those who never saw a chemistry textbook of the dot cloud pattern of an electron. The p and d and f orbital of an electron is dense dots near the nucleus of the atom and those dots become thinner the further away one goes from the nucleus. Now observational astronomy of the Sloan Great Wall and the other Great Wall quoted above from Wikipedia would be an example of "dense dots". These two walls would then imply that the NUCLEUS of the ATOM TOTALITY is in the direction of those two walls. But for the Atom Totality theory to be true, then the density of the Sloan Great Wall and Great Wall have to be continuous, given the exception that perhaps a node of the 5f6 is not between the Sloan Great Wall and the Great Wall. And the Wikipedia above says that "gas and dust from the Milky Way obscures". So we may have a suspended judgement or evaluation of whether the Atom Totality theory is supported or denied versus the Big Bang theory. By the way, the Big Bang theory would not have a pattern of increased thinness or sparseness of matter from the center of the explosion of the Big Bang, but rather the Great Wall and Sloan Great Wall would be at a far distance from the explosion itself. So the Atom Totality theory predicts high density from the Nucleus with increasing thinness with increasing distance, whereas the Big Bang predicts thinness from the "center" (nucleus in Atom Totality) and a dense wad further out from the center. So the density of galaxies is able to trashcann one of these two competing theories-- Big Bang or Atom Totality. So far the Huchra and Geller cataloging are supporting the Atom Totality theory because the Sloan Great Wall is 1 billion light years away and the Great Wall is 200 million light years away. That leaves us with 800 million light years of Space that is obscured by our own Milky Way Galaxy. If the Big Bang were true then the Sloan Great Wall and the Great Wall would be disconnected and would be opposite the *center* of the explosion. If the Atom Totality were true then the Sloan Great Wall and Great Wall would be near the Nucleus (center) and would be continuous of the Sloan Great Wall and Great Wall and that with increasing distance from the Sloan Great Wall the density of galaxies decreases. So far the Atom Totality is being supported and the Big Bang is looking sick and fake. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true
Now here is another website that has a snapshot of the Sloan Great Wall
and Great Wall of galaxies: http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~mjur...rse/all100.gif So let me rehash the issue. If the Universe is a single atom and a 231Pu Atom Totality then the density of galaxies should be very dense near the Nucleus of the Atom Totality and then uniformly sparse or thin out the further in distance one goes from the Nucleus. The Big Bang theory on the other hand would predict that the density of galaxies never gradually thins out over large distance. Here we have the example of a shotgun explosion where the pellets are dense at a distance away with few to no pellets on either side. So the Atom Totality theory and the Big Bang theory give different predictions as to galaxy density. And so far the Huchra & Geller mapping and the above Princeton mapping favor the Atom Totality. Big Bangers may say that the Sloan Great Wall is where the brunt of the explosion ended up. But their trouble is how do they explain the uniform gradual decline in number of galaxies as you move away from the Sloan Great Wall. The Atom Totality theory tells anyone to look in a chemistry textbook of the p, d, f orbitals of an atom for a dot cloud pattern and they immediately see the very dense dots near the nucleus and the gradual thinning out of dots the further one travels away from the nucleus. So all I need to prove the Atom Totality and debunk the Big Bang is to show that the density of galaxies declines uniformly as one goes away from the Sloan Great Wall. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true
On 2006-12-25 20:38:24 +0000, "a_plutonium" said:
So all I need to prove the Atom Totality and debunk the Big Bang is to show that the density of galaxies declines uniformly as one goes away from the Sloan Great Wall. Isotropic and homogeneous... -- For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Carl Sagan -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true
"Phineas T Puddleduck" wrote in message .. . On 2006-12-25 20:38:24 +0000, "a_plutonium" said: So all I need to prove the Atom Totality and debunk the Big Bang is to show that the density of galaxies declines uniformly as one goes away from the Sloan Great Wall. Isotropic and homogeneous... In reality all AP needs to "prove" the Atom Totality[*] is a totally different universe to the one we currently inhabit. Maybe the one in his imagination is better. [*] interesting take on the scientific method....... |
#157
|
|||
|
|||
density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: On 2006-12-25 20:38:24 +0000, "a_plutonium" said: So all I need to prove the Atom Totality and debunk the Big Bang is to show that the density of galaxies declines uniformly as one goes away from the Sloan Great Wall. Isotropic and homogeneous... Thanks, but what is the word for "thins out" the further you get from the nucleus. Isotropic is not apt for the Atom Totality because it is not "thinning out". Perhaps the Big Bang has isotropic properties for galaxies, but not Atom Totality. I think the words for electron dot cloud are (1) uniform pattern (2) thinning out with increasing distance Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#158
|
|||
|
|||
density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true
On 2006-12-26 03:30:36 +0000, "a_plutonium" said:
Thanks, but what is the word for "thins out" the further you get from the nucleus. Isotropic is not apt for the Atom Totality because it is not "thinning out". Perhaps the Big Bang has isotropic properties for galaxies, but not Atom Totality. There is no "nucleus" to the universe - no privileged frame. -- For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Carl Sagan -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true
T Wake wrote: "Phineas T Puddleduck" wrote in message .. . On 2006-12-25 20:38:24 +0000, "a_plutonium" said: So all I need to prove the Atom Totality and debunk the Big Bang is to show that the density of galaxies declines uniformly as one goes away from the Sloan Great Wall. Isotropic and homogeneous... In reality all AP needs to "prove" the Atom Totality[*] is a totally different universe to the one we currently inhabit. Maybe the one in his imagination is better. Imagination is the key to what he SHOULD have done. If he were truly a genius, he would have seen what he was up against and done something a la Ron Hubbard, by writing a book like _Archimedes Plutonium and the Atom Totality Universe_, which (from his point of view) is fact disguised as fiction, and slipped his ideas into the public conscious that way. In that case, he would have had a win-win situation; if he was right, he would be realized as a genius. If he was wrong, it could just be dismissed as fiction. Instead he chose a path which has made him look like a crank. --- Christopher Heckman |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Gravitational Instability Theory on the Formation of the Universe | Br Dan Izzo | Policy | 6 | September 7th 04 09:29 PM |
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory | Br Dan Izzo | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 31st 04 02:35 AM |