|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt23 axes of rotation of galaxies in a Atom Totality #454 AtomTotality 4th ed
I needed a chapter on the Axes of rotation of galaxies. If when
Galileo proposed that Earth spins on an axis, he could have had an easy proof of this by simply noting that water drains in opposite directions of northern and southern hemispheres. So if Galileo had made the effort to observe a water drain from bathtub in northern hemisphere and made a trip south to witness the opposite direction of drainage, would have been a proof of Earth spin. In a similar fashion, I need a chapter that starts to record the facts of whether galaxies in an opposite hemisphere have opposite rotational axes. The Cosmos as a Atom Totality of the 5f6 of plutonium would have a Cosmic plane in which has two hemispheres and where the rotational axes spin in opposite directions. --- quoting from --- http://www.springerlink.com/content/y553453022v14l14/ LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURES IN THE UNIVERSE OBSERVATIONAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS Lecture Notes in Physics, 1988, Volume 310/1988, 217-224, DOI: 10.1007/3-540-50135-5_72 The double galaxies in the Local, the Perseus, and the Coma/A1367 superclusters were studied. It is shown that these objects reveal the same tendency of alignment as the other galaxies belonging to the supercluster. The galaxy planes tend to be perpendicular to the plane of the parent supercluster and perpendicular to the radius-vectors from the centre of the supercluster. The angle between the rotation axes of galaxies in pairs, denoted as , was also determined. The ambiguity connected with the unknown sense of galaxy tilt and spin in the method presented was not removed, the range of the -angle is 0° – 180°. The distribution of the -angle is highly non-random. There is a statistically significant excess of small absolute values of the - angle and a deficit near perpendicular configurations. --- end quoting an abstract above --- The above does not give me evidence of opposite spin axes of galaxies, but it does give me one supporting piece of evidence. It says "angle is highly non-random." In a Big Bang theory we expect randomness. In an Atom Totality theory we expect high order. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt23 axes of rotation of galaxies in a Atom Totality #455 AtomTotality 4th ed
On May 30, 2:01*am, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote: I needed a chapter on the Axes of rotation of galaxies. If when Galileo proposed that Earth spins on an axis, he could have had an easy proof of this by simply noting that water drains in opposite directions of northern and southern hemispheres. So if Galileo had made the effort to observe a water drain from bathtub in northern hemisphere and made a trip south to witness the opposite direction of drainage, would have been a proof of Earth spin. In a similar fashion, I need a chapter that starts to record the facts of whether galaxies in an opposite hemisphere have opposite rotational axes. The Cosmos as a Atom Totality of the 5f6 of plutonium would have a Cosmic plane in which has two hemispheres and where the rotational axes spin in opposite directions. --- quoting from ---http://www.springerlink.com/content/y553453022v14l14/ LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURES IN THE UNIVERSE OBSERVATIONAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS Lecture Notes in Physics, 1988, Volume 310/1988, 217-224, DOI: 10.1007/3-540-50135-5_72 The double galaxies in the Local, the Perseus, and the Coma/A1367 superclusters were studied. It is shown that these objects reveal the same tendency of alignment as the other galaxies belonging to the supercluster. The galaxy planes tend to be perpendicular to the plane of the parent supercluster and perpendicular to the radius-vectors from the centre of the supercluster. The angle between the rotation axes of galaxies in pairs, denoted as , was also determined. The ambiguity connected with the unknown sense of galaxy tilt and spin in the method presented was not removed, the range of the -angle is 0° – 180°. The distribution of the -angle is highly non-random. There is a statistically significant excess of small absolute values of the - angle and a deficit near perpendicular configurations. --- end quoting an abstract above --- The above does not give me evidence of opposite spin axes of galaxies, but it does give me one supporting piece of evidence. It says "angle is highly non-random." In a Big Bang theory we expect randomness. In an Atom Totality theory we expect high order. Now the way the thinking goes on this axes of rotation of spiral galaxies within superclusters is the idea that the spiral galaxies in the Centaurus -- Hercules -- Shapley would spin in opposite directions of the spiral galaxies in the Perseus Pisces supercluster. So that once we find the Cosmic Axis, then looking in one direction of the cosmic axis we see spiral galaxies in rotation that is opposite the rotation of spiral galaxies in the other hemisphere. So far I do not see reports in the astro literature of opposite spinning spiral galaxies. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt23 axes of rotation of galaxies in a Atom Totality #455 AtomTotality 4th ed
This is not loigcal. It presumes that all galaxies are horizontal in
the same direction. Planet Earth orbits almost 90 degrees to the galaxy. The galactic center is on the ecliptic, but the galaxy is not. The same goes ith a totality of all galaxies. They do not spin all in a horizontal plane as if the Big Bang was a disk that exploded in solar system fashion. What does water do on the equator? Not spin at all. Don't think so. The spin itself is the allowance of upward air flow. The air causes the spin by forcing a vortex to be made in pressure to escape. So far science doesnt claim the universe has one vortex, but rather they describe black holes as these vortex of backflow energy. Maybe they need to define the difference between a wormhole and a black hole. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt23 axes of rotation of galaxies in a Atom Totality #455 AtomTotality 4th ed
I have yet to see anyone prove there are stars behind the visual
photographed black holes. Maybe there are no stars in THAT direction. It does happen in a forest looking out. Where has anyone yet proved that anything exists behind black holes, instead they thrive on the idea of soemthing sucking up energy. But that's okay, God has to contain himself somehow or he would lose his body. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chapter 12 Solid Body Rotation for galaxies only in Atom Totality,not Big Bang #433 Atom Totality 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 18th 11 08:00 AM |
Chapter 11 Solid Body Rotation for galaxies only in Atom Totality,not Big Bang #430 Atom Totality 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | May 17th 11 07:58 PM |
Chapt23 Earth Moon collision; Layered ages of the Cosmos and SolarSystem #395 Atom Totality 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 20th 11 07:26 AM |
distribution of galaxies points to Atom Totality not Big Bang #176 ;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 6th 09 09:29 AM |
basics-- what is "time" in an Atom Totality and the Plutonium AtomTotality layer as 6.5 billion years old versus the Uranium Atom Totality | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | June 16th 09 09:16 PM |