|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Simple question about SR paradox
On May 28, 4:18 am, Daryl McCullough wrote:
In the triplet paradox, what is being compared is not the aging of any particular twin or the elapsed time on any particular clock, but a comparison of two spacetime paths. Nonsense! In the twins’ or triplets’ paradox, it is the elapsed time of each party involved that is compared with the other(s). The triplets’ paradox does not allow the bull**** of turn-around to mystify the self-styled physicists. Initially have the triplets stay together at rest to others. Have two travel away with the same acceleration and deceleration profile. The same acceleration profile nulls out the bull**** effect. Then, allow the traveling two some coasting time with no acceleration, and this will build up mutual time dilation according to the Lorentz transform. When the triplets unite at rest again, the paradox becomes ever so apparent. shrug Oh, the idiots still cannot figure it out. They are still looking for the paths. They are just so dumb. shrug |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Simple question about SR paradox
It is still not clear to me what you believe will happen in the so-called
Twins paradox. When they are re-united, will the travelling twin be: a) The same age as the stay-at-home twin, or b) Older than the stay-at-home twin, or c) Younger than the stay at home twin? You have forgotten to say which of these is true. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Simple question about SR paradox
Addressing someone unknown,
"Peter Webb" wrote in message u... It is still not clear to me what you believe will happen in the so-called Twins paradox. When they are re-united, will the travelling twin be: a) The same age as the stay-at-home twin, or b) Older than the stay-at-home twin, or c) Younger than the stay at home twin? You have forgotten to say which of these is true. hanson wrote: .... ahahahahaha.... Here is help you, Peter: Webb, go look into the mirror. You'll see guy in the mirror who asks, over and over again, what you've just posted, over and over again.... because he is too ****ing lazy or stupid, drunk, senile, medicated, loaded, or otherwise intellectually challenged to investigate and answer the question to his own satisfaction. Shall I repost for you, Peter, what Einstein himself said about the crock o'**** that's called SR & GR? Thanks for the laughs you Dreidel... ahahaha... ahahanson |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Simple question about SR paradox | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 66 | June 5th 11 01:15 AM |
Simple question about SR paradox | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 28th 11 07:18 AM |
Simple question about SR paradox | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 3 | May 28th 11 02:09 AM |
Simple question about SR paradox | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 25th 11 12:35 AM |