|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo Trivia Question
Where is this piece of Apollo mission hardware ...located...today? http://www.insideksc.cjb.net:8081/mo...F/MQFAMANB.JPG And is it well guarded? Because I want it~ s |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo Trivia Question
Isn't that the micro inside the Mobile Quarantine Facility ??
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo Trivia Question
wrote in message oups.com... Isn't that the micro inside the Mobile Quarantine Facility ?? Yep, aint it pretty? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo Trivia Question
jonathan wrote: Yep, aint it pretty? Yes it is, looks like it's made by Amana. Any idea where it is now ?? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo Trivia Question
http://24.73.239.154:8081/moonshot/MQF/MQFSINK1.JPG I think this is the same micro looking at it from behind !! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo Trivia Question
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo Trivia Question
"Kevin Willoughby" wrote in message ... In article .com, says... Isn't that the micro inside the Mobile Quarantine Facility ?? The MQF is in the Udvar-Hazey museum, just outside of Washington DC. Presumably, the Radarrange is still inside it. Ya know, looking back, it seems pretty amazing the National Academy of Sciences insisted on the quarantine. I mean does anyone today think life on the surface of the moon is possible at all? I'm wondering if the elaborate and expensive quarantine was more for public consumption. I mean all that effort when the capsule hatch was wide open when it was in the sea waiting to be retrieved. -- Kevin Willoughby lid What gets measured gets done. -- David Patterson |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo Trivia Question
jonathan wrote:
Ya know, looking back, it seems pretty amazing the National Academy of Sciences insisted on the quarantine. I mean does anyone today think life on the surface of the moon is possible at all? I'm wondering if the elaborate and expensive quarantine was more for public consumption. I mean all that effort when the capsule hatch was wide open when it was in the sea waiting to be retrieved. Not of viable life, but otherwise tonnes of nifty cosmic spores that have long since been gamma and hard-X-ray terminated, double-IR roasted and/or having been vacuum sub-frozen to death, and otherwise rather nicely salted. Why not ask the wizards of FAS? Trivia fact; it was all a nifty ruse, exactly like the perpetrated cold-war and those WMD as of lately. Only a few trillions per decade spendy and somewhat lethal if you got in anyone's way or so much as thought of telling the truth. - Brad Guth |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo Trivia Question
"jonathan" wrote in message . .. Ya know, looking back, it seems pretty amazing the National Academy of Sciences insisted on the quarantine. I mean does anyone today think life on the surface of the moon is possible at all? I'm wondering if the elaborate and expensive quarantine was more for public consumption. I mean all that effort when the capsule hatch was wide open when it was in the sea waiting to be retrieved. The "elaborate and expensive" quarantine was peanuts compared to the overall cost of Apollo. Jeff -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - B. Franklin, Bartlett's Familiar Quotations (1919) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo Trivia Question
Trivia truth and consequences about our NASA/Apollo missions.
There was no need of any full scale lunar orbit that would have been unavoidably time comsuming and thereby nasty and otherwise extremely lethal to human DNA unless being as well shielded as were the robotic cameras taking all of those nifty images from orbit. At most we're talking about a somewhat testy though short stint within LL-1, and even that much wasn't necessarily the full package or even on behalf of getting those Apollo missions fully into the sweet-spot or nullification zone. Therefore the required energy for retrothrust wasn't utilized for accomplishing the moon orbit and of their subsequently breaking free of the moon's gravity. Only smaller robotic probes orbited that physically dark and nasty moon of ours. For accomplishing that much, they had loads of fuel to burn. Robotics did however orbit the moon, and having nicely photographed that physically dark orb, having then processed and transferring each of those images while on the fly. Therefore, we have no such actual film as ever having been returned to Earth for processing. The nearly 30% inert GLOW and the nearly as good as 60:1 ratio of rocket per payload make it perfectly clear, at least by the numbers and regular laws of physics and of known rocket-science, that putting nearly 50t into lunar orbit and so quickly never happened. It seems that I've been requested by the almighty GOOGLE hosted Usenet authority to "**** off". Well folks, "**** off" is my point exactly, that nobody here within this all-knowing "**** off" Usenet from hell cares about sharing the truth, least not about humanity, history or about anything that actually matters for the quality of life or even on behalf of sharing the few remaining energy and food resources with the likes of Muslims or any other non-Jewish folks, much less on behalf of defending mother Earth that's currently going postal. Obviously you folks either don't want to share and share alike, or else you wouldn't so much as dare honestly discuss those NASA/Apollo A-11, A-14 or A-16 missions as having that absolutely terrific and otherwise unavoidable look-see at Venus. Why am I and many other honest folks not the least bit surprised. In that case of "**** off", here's a my latest suggestion to each of those naysayers that typically suck and blow (such as most of these Third Reich collaborating contributors to this topic, as in much like yourself): http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SimplyMagic/TightFit.jpg "Chris Krolczyk, former Smithsonian anthropologist (and an evolutionist, obviously), does his thing outside National Museum of Natural History. Amazingly, Krolczyk reported meeting Tony Blair, President Bush and Rush Limbaugh inside the tunnel. Krolczyk has since left the Smithsonian to join Monty Pyton's Flying Circus." The rest of Ed Conrad's "RARE PHOTO OF FIRST MAN IN THE MOON -- FOX NEWS EXCLUSIVE" topic has also been sharing a bit of the actual truth and nothing but the truth. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...86a2ae5fb3c491 or as otherwise offered by this tpoic: "EXCLUSIVE PHOTO -- FIRST MAN IN THE MOON" http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...326bc56dc99e86 Besides Ed Conrad's honest contributions to science and the best available terrestrial truth about the extra age of humanity that's as old if not older than coal; what do you folks have to say on behalf of other intelligent life, as having been existing/coexisting on Venus. What's technically and otherwise perhaps evolutionary as to being within the realm of what's doable about Venus? What's all that wrong about there being a massive fluid arch on such a geothermally active Venus? What's so impossible or unlikely about other life existing/coexisting on Venus? What doesn't a newish planet like Venus have going for itself? - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
what was Apollo 1's mission to be? | PowerPost2000 | History | 16 | July 1st 06 03:16 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | CAPCOM | Astronomy Misc | 16 | February 21st 06 02:07 PM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | UK Astronomy | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) | Nathan Jones | UK Astronomy | 8 | February 4th 04 07:48 PM |
The Apollo Moon Hoax FAQ v4.1 November 2003 | Nathan Jones | Misc | 20 | November 11th 03 08:33 PM |