|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
My theory for the black holes
First of all - I got rid of my old avatar,I hope you will like the new(current) one.
So here it is... My whole theory is figured out after I done some huge research.I'm going to start with the human perspective of a black hole - What do we know about it?I mean do we even know what's inside?We came out with the sure thing that they have enormous "amount" of gravity and they are very dense,daahh .Their gravity is so big that all the light gets sucked in,right?But my theory tries to explain why are they black.I mean if the gravity swallows all the light how can that hole be black.The colors are product of the light if I can express myself like this.So,this leads me to think that they are kind of transperant.You may consider all of this nuts like I lost my marbles but it is all based on the blindness.A blind person can't see light,right?And it is proved that the blindness is not expressed through the black color,I mean if you are blind you won't see the color black.As the blind man can't see the light wherefrom he can't see the black color, so the black hole's gravity sucks all the light until there is no light wherefrom it can't be black.So the only thing that's left is the transperant theory..So the "transperant"(ex. black) hole shows the things behind it but not that close from him I mean the distant space. So that is my theory.I do not know is it science-true.Can you give me your opinions? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
My theory for the black holes
On 8/3/15 10:33 AM, Томислав Димитров wrote:
So here it is... My whole theory is figured out after I done some huge research.I'm going to start with the human perspective of a black hole - What do we know about it?I mean do we even know what's inside?We came out with the sure thing that they have enormous "amount" of gravity and they are very dense,daahh .Their gravity is so big that all the light gets sucked in,right? Black holes have no more gravity than any other mass, but is appear to be concentrated at a point. Thus if one gets close the gravitational force can be strong enough that light cannot escape. Black holes are very simple -- three measurable properties. http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/BlackHole.html -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
My theory for the black holes
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 08:33:33 -0700 (PDT), ???????? ????????
wrote this crap: So that is my theory.I do not know is it science-true. Can you give me your opinions? You wouldn't like it. This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
My theory for the black holes
On Monday, August 3, 2015 at 4:50:14 PM UTC+1, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 8/3/15 10:33 AM, Томислав Димитров wrote: So here it is... My whole theory is figured out after I done some huge research.I'm going to start with the human perspective of a black hole - What do we know about it?I mean do we even know what's inside?We came out with the sure thing that they have enormous "amount" of gravity and they are very dense,daahh .Their gravity is so big that all the light gets sucked in,right? Black holes have no more gravity than any other mass, but is appear to be concentrated at a point. Thus if one gets close the gravitational force can be strong enough that light cannot escape. Black holes are very simple -- three measurable properties. http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/BlackHole.html -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues. Nobody gets the joke. Infinite density/zero volume = infinite volume/zero density = Nothing !.. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
My theory for the black holes
On Monday, August 3, 2015 at 9:33:39 AM UTC-6, Томислав Димитров wrote:
And it is proved that the blindness is not expressed through the black color,I mean if you are blind you won't see the color black. Yes, but how can that possibly have anything to do with what a black hole is? Why would the nature of the psychological sensation associated with the absence of vision have anything to do with a physical process involving light or its absence? John Savard |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
My theory for the black holes
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 10:04:01 -0700 (PDT), oriel36
wrote this crap: On Monday, August 3, 2015 at 4:50:14 PM UTC+1, Sam Wormley wrote: On 8/3/15 10:33 AM, ???????? ???????? wrote: So here it is... My whole theory is figured out after I done some huge research.I'm going to start with the human perspective of a black hole - What do we know about it?I mean do we even know what's inside?We came out with the sure thing that they have enormous "amount" of gravity and they are very dense,daahh .Their gravity is so big that all the light gets sucked in,right? Black holes have no more gravity than any other mass, but is appear to be concentrated at a point. Thus if one gets close the gravitational force can be strong enough that light cannot escape. Black holes are very simple -- three measurable properties. http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/BlackHole.html -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues. Nobody gets the joke. Infinite density/zero volume = infinite volume/zero density = Nothing !. Steven Hawkings did. He wrote a paper on it. Any serious mathematician gets it. This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
My theory for the black holes
It should be called the 'sinvulgarity' - a particularly funny way to describe 'Nothing' for those who have even the barest level of common sense.
Singularity = infinite density/zero volume which has the same meaning as infinite volume/zero density. It is insanity by any other name. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
My theory for the black holes
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 12:30:19 -0700 (PDT), oriel36
wrote this crap: It should be called the 'sinvulgarity' - a particularly funny way to describe 'Nothing' for those who have even the barest level of common sense. Singularity = infinite density/zero volume which has the same meaning as infinite volume/zero density. It is insanity by any other name. Nothing gets by you. This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
My theory for the black holes
On 03/08/2015 16:33, Томислав Димитров wrote:
First of all - I got rid of my old avatar,I hope you will like the new(current) one. So here it is... My whole theory is figured out after I done some huge research. I'm going to start with the human perspective of a black hole - What do we know about it? Quite a lot. Laplace first conjectured the possibility of a gravitating body with an escape velocity such that not even light could escape. I mean do we even know what's inside? Apart from at the singularity there is nothing special. Spagettification will be a rather unpleasant experience but if you choose a nice big black hole it won't happen anywhere near the event horizon. You will just fade out from external view as you enter it becoming both fainter and ever more red shifted. We came out with the sure thing that they have enormous "amount" of gravity and they are very dense,daahh . The singularity at the centre is infinitely dense and almost certainly not correctly described by current theories but quantum gravity isn't available yet. You will be very long, thin and dead before reaching it. Their gravity is so big that all the light gets sucked in,right? Not at all. Light can orbit around a black hole and the last stable orbit for a non spinning BH is 3R but for a maximally spinning one eithe R going in the same sense as the spin or 9R going against it. Hollywood movies have a lot to answer for. Black holes are not cosmic vacuum cleaners. If the sun turned into a BH tomorrow the planets would still orbit it quite happily although the spin up would create a lot more frame dragging and Mercury would suffer for it. But my theory tries to explain why are they black.I mean if the gravity swallows all the light how can that hole be black. It doesn't swallow all the light it merely never lets any light that enters the event horizon ever get out again. Hence black. It is a surface where any light that hits it is never reflected or scattered this is pretty much a perfect definition of black. The colors are product of the light if I can express myself like this.So,this leads me to think that they are kind of transperant. The BH itself is black. Around it there is gravitational lensing as light is bent by the gravitational field. You may consider all of this nuts like I lost my marbles but it is all based on the blindness. A blind person can't see light,right?And it is proved that the blindness is not expressed through the black color, I mean if you are blind you won't see the color black.As the blind man can't see the light wherefrom he can't see the black color, so the black hole's gravity sucks all the light until there is no light wherefrom it can't be black. So the only thing that's left is the transperant theory.So the "transperant"(ex. black) hole shows the things behind it but not that close from him I mean the distant space. So that is my theory.I do not know is it science-true.Can you give me your opinions? Random word salad with a few buzzwords thrown in does not make a theory. -- Regards, Martin Brown |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
My theory for the black holes
On Monday, August 3, 2015 at 11:33:39 AM UTC-4, Томислав Димитров wrote:
First of all - I got rid of my old avatar,I hope you will like the new(current) one. No one suggested that you get a new avatar. Now take your theory over to sci.astro or uk.sci.astronomy where it will be welcomed and appreciated. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chapt 15 MECO theory replacing black-holes #307 ATOM TOTALITY,ONE-ATOM-UNIVERSE theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 17th 10 06:13 AM |
New theory about the first black holes: 10 million Solar mass stars! | Yousuf Khan[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 10 | December 11th 09 12:47 AM |
Thoughts connecting Le Sage's theory, black holes, MOND, dark matter, dark force. | Jan Panteltje | Astronomy Misc | 2 | December 30th 08 08:21 AM |
New Theory: Black Holes may not exist | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 0 | August 8th 06 01:23 AM |