Telescope for deepsky!

On Tuesday, 21 July 2015 20:56:22 UTC+2, Mike Collins wrote:

I can't see anything on your network because it uses flash graphics. Move
into the 21st century.

Whoops! It's very odd and disappointing that a company promoting video astronomy [i.e. astro imagery] should have such a poor website. The images shown in the promotional video are horribly pixelated and very low resolution. They break down completely when viewed full screen. A very small pair of binoculars [even antique opera glasses!] would show far better lunar views than these. Albeit at a rather smaller scale. [;ø]

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 2:37:00 PM UTC-4, LdB wrote:

To you and the rest of the traditionalists viewing isn't that
interesting at the best of times. There is so little you can actually
see with your antiquated equipment you can't truly find much of
interest.

It's easy to understand how someone, such as yourself, who has very poor observing skills, bad eyesight and a lack of both patience and intelligence would come to such false and narrow-minded conclusions.

Face it, if you told beginners the truth there wouldn't be many
beginners.

All the evidence necessary is at the NightSkiesNetwork

There must not be many "video astronomers" because that website is a ghost town.

but you can't
see a broadcast because the librarian kicks you out into the street
before the broadcasting starts.

You are clearly a liar.

On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 1:59:18 PM UTC-4, LsD wrote:


With absolutely no way to defend himself the Smell reverts back to
insults. In an effort to defend himself and to breath life into his
dying eyepiece viewing hobby he tries to mock the people that are
promoting real astronomy. Even his own kind realize he doesn't have
the slightest idea of what he babbles about.

Your Nightskiesnetwork is a veritable ghost town. We have to assume that any video equipment being used there, assuming any is actually being used at all, is not ready for prime time.

"No broadcasts at this time"

LdB wrote:
On 7/14/2015 7:40 AM, wrote:


You have provided no evidence that you actually do anything interesting
or constructive WRT astronomy. You do seem to brag quite a bit though.

Maybe some day I'll take the time to post a report about what some of
it [ the Universe ] really looks like.

No doubt it will be every bit as eloquent as the garbage you have posted so far.


To you and the rest of the traditionalists viewing isn't that interesting
at the best of times. There is so little you can actually see with your
antiquated equipment you can't truly find much of interest. You and the
traditionalist have the equivalent of Sagan's handful of sand to view.
Modern equipment lets us see Sagan's entire beach.

As for being constructive, we are building a new kind of astronomy, One
based on seeing rather than speculating. If one can enjoy almost seeing
an object with an eyepiece imagine the thrill to actually see it when
using modern equipment.

We offer a way to do what visual astronomy is all about. The ability to
see. All your kind has to offer are eloquent but unfulfilled promises and
in some cases outright lies.

Face it, if you told beginners the truth there wouldn't be many beginners.

All the evidence necessary is at the NightSkiesNetwork but you can't see
a broadcast because the librarian kicks you out into the street before
the broadcasting starts.

You'll just have to learn to live with your life choices or find work and
become a productive member of society. With a normal income you could
afford all sorts of luxuries, like a Mallincam, that will let you see
what you and your fellow traditionalists have been trying to see since
their first view through an eyepiece.

Who knows you may have enough left over to buy a bar of soap. Maybe one
or two of the traditionalists will even join you for a look.

Your form of eloquence is nothing more than a camouflage for false
information and confusion.

I speak in working class English. I'm neither proud or ashamed of that, I
only speak the truth and have no desire to make myself appear to be
something I'm not. Eloquence isn't necessary.

You and your fellow traditionalist have no choice but to be eloquent.
It's the only way to mask the smell of the excrement you try to pass off as truth.

LdB

No evidence for me that the night sky network is anything other than s
front page. It needs to move into the 21st century.