A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Relativity



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 25th 15, 09:48 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
oriel36[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,478
Default Relativity

Relativity wasn't a theory and it certainly was not a human accomplishment, it was a signal for the empiricist community to enter into a consensus that the wider world would accept voodoo and bluffing as intellectual excellence.

I have analysed in considerable detail the constructs of Newton which he framed as absolute/relative time,space and motion however I have discovered that despite the familiarity of such things as the timekeeping facility known as the Equation of Time expressed in a meaningless state as Newton's ' absolute/relative time' ,empiricists are horrified that it is understandable.. The very scam of mathematicians is making sure relativity is proposed to be very difficult to understand for the wider world but they never counted on how it borrows on Newton's original terminology and the purposes designed for his absolute/relative definitions.

So,one hundred years on and I switch on the news to see these academics wax lyrical about a self-serving scam whereas residents of this forum are aware of the entire sprawling story for good and for bad.
  #2  
Old November 26th 15, 04:54 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
oriel36[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,478
Default Relativity

It is pretty much a swindle that relies on a nervous consensus, not so much relativity itself but the language of absolute/relative time,space and motion originating with Newton. The timekeeping facility known as the Equation of Time was expressed by Newton in a meaningless fashion using a dichotomy of absolute and relative which distinguishes the variations in the total length of the natural noon cycle from the constant 24 hour AM/PM cycle -

"Absolute time, in astronomy, is distinguished from relative, by the
equation or correlation of the vulgar time. For the natural days are
truly unequal, though they are commonly considered as equal and used
for a measure of time; astronomers correct this inequality for their
more accurate deducing of the celestial motions...The necessity of
which equation, for determining the times of a phænomenon, is evinced
as well from the experiments of the pendulum clock, as by eclipses of
the satellites of Jupiter." Principia

The theorists have been betting that people will be attracted to the relativistic novelties of time travel,warped space ect to not notice the underpinnings which are fairly explicable with familiarity and effort. The worst thing possible for the early 20th century junk is making Newton understandable hence the theorists couldn't care less how many people dispute relativity so long as they avoid the original language of Newton.

What is happening is a tragedy but no more so than the distortions Newton introduced to astronomical and timekeeping principles in order to promote his experimental agenda.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GENERAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT SPECIAL RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 12 January 1st 09 03:20 PM
DO RELATIVITY ZOMBIES UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY HYPNOTISTS? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 12 June 5th 07 12:14 AM
Relativity entity Misc 10 August 19th 04 11:37 AM
Relativity FAQ Nathan Jones Misc 4 December 9th 03 11:17 AM
Relativity FAQ Nathan Jones Astronomy Misc 3 December 8th 03 05:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.