|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO : M63 (sunflower galaxy)
And another try for M63.
8 x 180 sec 9 x 120 sec 7 x 90 sec Stacked in Maximdl Processed in CS 10"SCT No auto guiding (working on it..) Some vignetting occured but forgot to take flats... Hope it doesn't show on your screen.. reg Dirk |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO : M63 (sunflower galaxy)
another nice one Dirk
Do you think the star shapes are distorted by tracking or collimation? "D van den H" wrote in message bel.net... And another try for M63. 8 x 180 sec 9 x 120 sec 7 x 90 sec Stacked in Maximdl Processed in CS 10"SCT No auto guiding (working on it..) Some vignetting occured but forgot to take flats... Hope it doesn't show on your screen.. reg Dirk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO : M63 (sunflower galaxy)
Richard thx for the tips, in this image i really don't know. it looks like
only the upper left are effected.. Strange hey. reg Dirk "Richard Crisp" wrote in message t... another nice one Dirk Do you think the star shapes are distorted by tracking or collimation? "D van den H" wrote in message bel.net... And another try for M63. 8 x 180 sec 9 x 120 sec 7 x 90 sec Stacked in Maximdl Processed in CS 10"SCT No auto guiding (working on it..) Some vignetting occured but forgot to take flats... Hope it doesn't show on your screen.. reg Dirk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO : M63 (sunflower galaxy)
D van den H wrote: And another try for M63. 8 x 180 sec 9 x 120 sec 7 x 90 sec Stacked in Maximdl Processed in CS 10"SCT No auto guiding (working on it..) Some vignetting occured but forgot to take flats... Hope it doesn't show on your screen.. reg Dirk For the short exposures you've gone rather deep. In my R model if the collimation is correct for one side rather than the center then the opposite side will get stars like you have in that corner. My collimation seems temperature sensitive, winter is different than summer. You likely don't have my temperature swings of 70C between seasons. Also if focus is not exactly right the problem is accentuated. Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO : M63 (sunflower galaxy)
Thx Rick, if i look at a single shot, it looks like a tracking error.
Other pictures don't show these assumed collimation error (which was my first thought too) I posted a single shot here as reference.. reg Dirk "Rick Johnson" wrote in message news D van den H wrote: And another try for M63. 8 x 180 sec 9 x 120 sec 7 x 90 sec Stacked in Maximdl Processed in CS 10"SCT No auto guiding (working on it..) Some vignetting occured but forgot to take flats... Hope it doesn't show on your screen.. reg Dirk For the short exposures you've gone rather deep. In my R model if the collimation is correct for one side rather than the center then the opposite side will get stars like you have in that corner. My collimation seems temperature sensitive, winter is different than summer. You likely don't have my temperature swings of 70C between seasons. Also if focus is not exactly right the problem is accentuated. Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO : M63 (sunflower galaxy)
That looks a lot like a problem I had when I used the draw tube rather
than screwing on the camera using T treads. The nose would tilt a bit when the screws to hold it in the draw tube were tightened so the camera was no longer at right angles to the optical axis. The difference was small but it showed in the stars. Once I went to a rigid system using threads that wasn't a problem. Rick D van den H wrote: Thx Rick, if i look at a single shot, it looks like a tracking error. Other pictures don't show these assumed collimation error (which was my first thought too) I posted a single shot here as reference.. reg |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO : M63 (sunflower galaxy)
Oke, i will investigate it Rick, thx for the tip.
reg Dirk "Rick Johnson" wrote in message ... That looks a lot like a problem I had when I used the draw tube rather than screwing on the camera using T treads. The nose would tilt a bit when the screws to hold it in the draw tube were tightened so the camera was no longer at right angles to the optical axis. The difference was small but it showed in the stars. Once I went to a rigid system using threads that wasn't a problem. Rick D van den H wrote: Thx Rick, if i look at a single shot, it looks like a tracking error. Other pictures don't show these assumed collimation error (which was my first thought too) I posted a single shot here as reference.. reg |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO : M63 (sunflower galaxy)
"Rick Johnson" wrote
That looks a lot like a problem I had when I used the draw tube rather than screwing on the camera using T treads....... Rick, et al: It's hard to believe how many little things like this have to work right to get good images....... and that's *before* the atmosphere gets its chance at messing with us! George N |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASTRO: A sunflower in bloom | Rick Johnson[_2_] | Astro Pictures | 3 | May 13th 07 12:28 PM |
ASTRO: sunflower galaxy | D van den H | Astro Pictures | 0 | March 29th 07 08:23 PM |
ASTRO: galaxy M94 | D van den H | Astro Pictures | 2 | March 28th 07 07:17 PM |
SunFlower math.. | Misc | 2 | January 9th 05 02:58 AM | |
Math of a SunFlower | SunFlower | Solar | 0 | January 8th 05 01:29 PM |