|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
The Hubble Space Telescope...
"David A. Scott" wrote in message .1.4...
In many ways the Hubble is a failure they never even cut the mirror correctly. Do we really want a monument to that simple error. I still think we should try to build one the right way but since management has gone so far down hill its likely our next attempt would be far worse. Hubble could have done much more if it was ground correctly. The extra lenses added to it failed to make it as good as it should have been. Dead. Wrong! Firstly, extra mirrors, not lenses, and in point of fact there's no "extra" about it anymore, the individual instruments in HST now were designed with the mirrors actual shape in mind and correct for it in their optical paths, often without increasing the number of optical elements used compared with an instrument designed for a nominal Hubble mirror. More importantly, the sharpness of the light focused by HST after these corrections have been made is actually better than the design criterion for Hubble. In all aspects Hubble has far exceeded the design criteria and goals for the project, it is an unqualified success by any sensible measure. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |
New Hubble Space Telescope Exhibit Opens At Goddard | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | September 30th 03 11:07 PM |