|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese space station
In article , Dr. O dr.o@xxxxx wrote:
...already convinced that the Shenzhou launch will help their commercial satellite business enormously, there's already talk that the U.S. satellite manfucturers are petitioning Congress to allow them to launch on Chinese launchers. The US satellite manufacturers have been doing that for years, ever since they were barred from Chinese launchers as part of the Republican vendetta against Clinton. (Clinton having permitted, directly and indirectly, the use of Chinese launchers, he was obviously to blame for alleged technology leakage as a result. So, hyping the Yellow Peril contributed to attempts to embarrass him.) At most, the Shenzhou flight has given them a new opportunity to press their case once again. -- MOST launched 1015 EDT 30 June, separated 1046, | Henry Spencer first ground-station pass 1651, all nominal! | |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese space station
"B. Isaksen" wrote in message om... I'm not implying that (or at least I didn't intend to) a lunar flyby will help their commercial launching business, but a man-rated program will. OTOH nobody knows how the Chinese man-rated their vehicle in the first place. It may well be that hardly any changes were made and that they just relied on better inspections. Just the USA has manrated a rocket by it selv, and its free for everyone to see how well that went. The russians and the chinese has rated a system also incorperating an escape system. True, but the system has AFAIK never been tested when the booster explodes in-flight at high altitude. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese space station
Joe Strout wrote in message ...
In article , "Dr. O" dr.o@xxxxx wrote: http://www.space.com/missionlaunches...ns_031016.html The Chinese have announced they will soon launch a space-lab and after that a space station. I'm baffled what could be gained from this? There's hardly any usefull science that can be done in space (except the eternal experiment what happens to humans and all of God's creatures under zero grav circumstances) that can't be done here on Earth. Maybe they're not interested in doing science on it. Maybe they realize there is a lot more that could be done in space than science. Maybe, unlike most of the U.S. authorities, they actually have a clue why space is important and how to develop it. Yeah. Hypothetically, how would it feel to know, that the first robotic Chinese lunar mission will go with a goal to test out their ISRU technologies ? Produce solar panels or even just simply refine some materials ? O2 from regolith for instance. And they _have_ announced plans to send a robotic probe.... -kert |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese space station
In article ,
"Dr. O" dr.o@xxxxx wrote: How is performing a PR stunt smart and wise? It wil put them (at least on paper) ahead of both the EU and Russia. You believe that China is engaging in some sort of show-off game? What would the winner of this game win? Survival of their race. We need more, please. How *exactly* does engaging in a PR stunt, to put them (on paper) ahead of a couple other countries, have anything at all to do with the survival of their race (which is, BTW, already a plurality of our species)? Frankly, I don't see any connection and if I didn't know better, I'd suspect you were just making up nonsense. Also, I find it hard to believe that a manned lunar flyby (an enormously expensive project) would pay for itself as a marketing gimmick. The Chinese have revealed that they spend about $2billion on their entire manned-space project (encompassing over ten years). That's dirt cheap compared to the U.S. or Europe and even much cheaper than Russia. Yes, and they're also nowhere near the capability for a manned lunar flyby. That puts a lunar flyby within financial reach, certainly within a decade, probably far less. How do you figure that? Someone already pointed out the the Long March 3 can lift big enough payloads to perform a lunar flyby (although they would have to man-rate the thing). In short, they can do it with minimal financial impact. There's a lot more to performing a lunar flyby than just being able to lift enough kilos. Check out "Failure Is Not An Option" by Gene Kranz for a deeper understanding of what is involved. But suppose they could do it for, say, an additional $3 billion. How much do you think this would increase their satellite-launch business, and how long do you suppose it would take them to recover this $3 billion marketing gimmick? Cheers, - Joe ,------------------------------------------------------------------. | Joseph J. Strout Check out the Mac Web Directory: | | http://www.macwebdir.com | `------------------------------------------------------------------' |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese space station
plan to fill the
solar system with people. Chinese people, no doubt, but frankly I don't much care as long as somebody does it. Really? And what if they effectively bar nonchinese people from all the good resources? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese space station
Joe Strout wrote in
: Why aren't the Chinese smart and wise and planning to send a manned capsule around the moon? That would be a *huge* PR stunt. How is performing a PR stunt smart and wise? Communism is dead in China. Only patriotic pride and nationalism is holding the country together. Much fo what China is doing in the space program is to bolster this nationalism. If nationalism in China dies, the we can see the country falling apart like in Russia. The government and the Chinese people don't really want to see that happen. -- Lucas Tam ) Please delete "REMOVE" from the e-mail address when replying. http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/coolspot18/ |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese space station
(G EddieA95) wrote in
: plan to fill the solar system with people. Chinese people, no doubt, but frankly I don't much care as long as somebody does it. Really? And what if they effectively bar nonchinese people from all the good resources? On the bright side, the Chinese has never been a colonial power. The Chinese never believed in imperialism. -- Lucas Tam ) Please delete "REMOVE" from the e-mail address when replying. http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/coolspot18/ |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese space station
In article ,
Lucas Tam wrote: On the bright side, the Chinese has never been a colonial power. The Chinese never believed in imperialism. If you discount the small question of Tibet, of course. Besides, such national preferences have been known to change. The US was never an imperial power*, and was vehemently opposed to imperialism, until it had the chance to acquire some of Spain's overseas possessions after the Spanish-American War... at which point, the US decided to become an imperial power. (* Neglecting the fate of the Indians, and a couple of unsuccessful attempts to conquer Canada.) -- MOST launched 30 June; first light, 29 July; 5arcsec | Henry Spencer pointing, 10 Sept; first science, early Oct; all well. | |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese space station
plan to fill the
solar system with people. Chinese people, no doubt, but frankly I don't much care as long as somebody does it. Really? And what if they effectively bar nonchinese people from all the good resources? All civilians have always been effectively barred by nasa from going to the ISS so what'll be the dam difference if the Chinese get a station, you racist? ^ //^\\ ~~~ near space elevator ~~~~ ~~~members.aol.com/beanstalkr/~~~ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |
International Space Station Marks Five Years In Orbit | Ron Baalke | Space Station | 9 | November 22nd 03 12:17 PM |
International Space Station Marks Five Years In Orbit | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 2 | November 20th 03 03:09 PM |