|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
No Red Space Menace
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 21:08:12 +0200, in a place far, far away, "Dr. O"
dr.o@xxxxx made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: A space race will ensue pretty quickly once the Chinese catch up with the U.S. Mark my words!! For now, the Chinese are decades behind the U.S. but if the U.S. stands still, it will eventually be overtaken. Then, the U.S. will have to make a decision to allow the Chinese to overtake it or to put up a fight. Let the new space race begin!!! Weak arguments aren't rendered more compelling with the use of single, let alone multiple exclamation marks... -- simberg.interglobal.org * 310 372-7963 (CA) 307 739-1296 (Jackson Hole) interglobal space lines * 307 733-1715 (Fax) http://www.interglobal.org "Extraordinary launch vehicles require extraordinary markets..." Swap the first . and @ and throw out the ".trash" to email me. Here's my email address for autospammers: |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
No Red Space Menace
"Rand Simberg" wrote in message ... On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 21:08:12 +0200, in a place far, far away, "Dr. O" dr.o@xxxxx made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: A space race will ensue pretty quickly once the Chinese catch up with the U.S. Mark my words!! For now, the Chinese are decades behind the U.S. but if the U.S. stands still, it will eventually be overtaken. Then, the U.S. will have to make a decision to allow the Chinese to overtake it or to put up a fight. Let the new space race begin!!! Weak arguments aren't rendered more compelling with the use of single, let alone multiple exclamation marks... You're missing the point, Rand. These kind of things have nothing to do with logical arguments. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
No Red Space Menace
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:41:25 +0200, in a place far, far away, "Dr. O"
dr.o@xxxxx made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: Weak arguments aren't rendered more compelling with the use of single, let alone multiple exclamation marks... You're missing the point, Rand. These kind of things have nothing to do with logical arguments. Apparently... -- simberg.interglobal.org * 310 372-7963 (CA) 307 739-1296 (Jackson Hole) interglobal space lines * 307 733-1715 (Fax) http://www.interglobal.org "Extraordinary launch vehicles require extraordinary markets..." Swap the first . and @ and throw out the ".trash" to email me. Here's my email address for autospammers: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |