A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Einstein's Relativity Refuted by Doppler Effect



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 22nd 21, 08:14 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,011
Default Einstein's Relativity Refuted by Doppler Effect

The observer starts moving relative to the emitter in Doppler:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE

The frequency and the speed of the light pulses VARY PROPORTIONALLY for the moving observer, in violation of Einstein's relativity. The wavelength (or distance between subsequent pulses) obviously remains constant:

"Thus, the moving observer sees a wave possessing the same wavelength [...] but a different frequency [...] to that seen by the stationary observer." http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teachin...ml/node41.html

"Vo is the velocity of an observer moving towards the source. This velocity is independent of the motion of the source. Hence, the velocity of waves relative to the observer is c + Vo. [...] The motion of an observer does not alter the wavelength. The increase in frequency is a result of the observer encountering more wavelengths in a given time." http://a-levelphysicstutor.com/wav-doppler.php

Albert Einstein Institute: "In the above paragraphs, we have only considered moving sources. In fact, a closer look at cases where it is the receiver that is in motion will show that this kind of motion leads to a very similar kind of Doppler effect. Here is an animation of the receiver moving towards the source:

https://www.einstein-online.info/wp-...ein-Online.gif

By observing the two indicator lights, you can see for yourself that, once more, there is a blue-shift - the pulse frequency measured at the receiver is somewhat higher than the frequency with which the pulses are sent out. This time, the DISTANCES BETWEEN SUBSEQUENT PULSES ARE NOT AFFECTED, BUT STILL THERE IS A FREQUENCY SHIFT: As the receiver moves towards each pulse, the time until pulse and receiver meet up is shortened. In this particular animation, which has the receiver moving towards the source at one third the speed of the pulses themselves, four pulses are received in the time it takes the source to emit three pulses." http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/doppler.html

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
Ads
  #2  
Old Yesterday, 12:24 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,011
Default Einstein's Relativity Refuted by Doppler Effect

The motion of the observer clearly cannot change the distance between the light pulses https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE. Accordingly, the frequency and the speed of the pulses VARY PROPORTIONALLY for the moving observer - only crimestop saves Einstein's relativity from total collapse:

George Orwell: "Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity."

So, in teaching Doppler effect in light, Einsteinians avoid "moving observer" and teach "moving source":

Stephen Hawking, "A Brief History of Time", Chapter 3: "Now imagine a source of light at a constant distance from us, such as a star, emitting waves of light at a constant wavelength. Obviously the wavelength of the waves we receive will be the same as the wavelength at which they are emitted (the gravitational field of the galaxy will not be large enough to have a significant effect). Suppose now that the source starts moving toward us. When the source emits the next wave crest it will be nearer to us, so the distance between wave crests will be smaller than when the star was stationary." http://www.fisica.net/relatividade/s...ry_of_time.pdf

Things seem to be Einstein-friendly here. Frequency and wavelength are inversely proportional. Accordingly, the speed of light is gloriously constant.

The problem is that variable (dependent on the speed of the emitter) wavelength of light

https://www.einstein-online.info/wp-...ein-Online.gif

contradicts the principle of relativity. By measuring the varying wavelength (or distance between light pulses), inside his spaceship, the emitter would know his speed without looking outside.

For a given emitter, the wavelength of light is CONSTANT. Accordingly, the speed of light is VARIABLE AS PER NEWTON.

More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Doppler Effect Disproves Einstein's Relativity Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 July 23rd 20 06:07 PM
Doppler Effect Disproves Einstein's Relativity Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 March 30th 19 11:58 PM
How the Doppler Effect Disproves Einstein's Relativity Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 February 18th 17 01:52 PM
DOPPLER EFFECT WIPES OUT EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 September 15th 14 07:16 AM
EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY INCOMPATIBLE WITH DOPPLER EFFECT Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 August 15th 14 04:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2021 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.