Pento Valev vs. Banesh Hoffmann

On Dec 17, 6:01 pm, Uncle Ben wrote:

Our french friend Pento Valev tries to catch relativists expressing
reservations or even regrets at having accepted the basics of Special
Relativity. He often quotes the well-known Baneesh Hoffmann, a friend
and collaborator of Einstein, in what Pento describes as Hoffmann's
"confession":

[Hoffmann said] “Einstein
resisted the temptation to account for the null result in terms of
particles of light and simple, familiar Newtonian ideas, and
introduced as his second postulate something that was more or less
obvious when thought of in terms of waves in an ether."

Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was plagiarizing on
the works of physicists who had accepted the existence of the Aether
in electromagnetism. The nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar really
had no idea what he was plagiarizing on. What a nitwit, a plagiarist,
and a liar! shrug

For instance, if it is so obvious, how could it turn out to be part
of
a revolution--especially when the first principle is also a natural
one?

Nonsense, the second principle was already a postulate of Woldemer
Voigt almost 20 years before the plagiarized works of Einstein the
nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. shrug

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woldemar_Voigt

In that, Voigt did not feel like invoking the principle of relativity
as a necessity in explaining the null results of the MMX, and he was
right. Even Larmor’s transform (the closest form and concept to the
Lorentz transform) does not satisfy the principle of relativity.
shrug

[Hoffmann continued] "If it was so obvious, though, why did
he need to state is as a principle?”

Because Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was nothing
but a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. shrug

[Hoffmann continued] “Because, having taken from the
idea of light waves in the ether the
one aspect that he needed,
he declared early in his paper, to quote his own words, that 'the
introduction of a" luminiferous ether"
will prove to be supefluous.' "

Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was indeed a nitwit,
a plagiarist, and a liar to say **** like that. shrug

[Hoffmann continued] "We see in all this the workings
of an extraoordinary intuition. The
beautiful thing about Einstein's
cunningly chosen pair of principles is that each by itself seems
harmless, yet the two together
form an explosive mixture destined to rock the foundations of
physics. ... "

This is the first time in history that two fvcking groundless
assumptions are celebrated into divinity. Gee! Just how fvcking said
is that? shrug

The list describing Einstein Dingleberries are growing all thanking
the inputs from Einstein Dingleberries themselves. shrug

** FAITH IS LOGIC
** LYING IS TEACHING
** NITWIT IS GENIUS
** OCCULT IS SCIENCE
** FICTION IS THEORY
** PARADOX IS KOSHER
** FUDGING IS DERIVATION
** BULL**** IS TRUTH
** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
** BELIEVING IS LEARNING
** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE
** PRIESTHOOD IS TENURE
** CONJECTURE IS REALITY
** HANDWAVING IS REASONING
** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS
** FRAUDULENCE IS VERIFICATION
** INCONSISTENCY IS CONSISTENCY
** INTERPRETATION IS FACT

shrug