|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT: FUNDAMENTAL THEOREMS
http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae13.cfm
"So, it is absolutely true that the speed of light is not constant in a gravitational field [which, by the equivalence principle, applies as well to accelerating (non-inertial) frames of reference]. If this were not so, there would be no bending of light by the gravitational field of stars....Indeed, this is exactly how Einstein did the calculation in: 'On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light,' Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911. which predated the full formal development of general relativity by about four years. This paper is widely available in English. You can find a copy beginning on page 99 of the Dover book 'The Principle of Relativity.' You will find in section 3 of that paper, Einstein's derivation of the (variable) speed of light in a gravitational potential, eqn (3). The result is, c' = c0 ( 1 + V / c^2 ) where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the speed of light c0 is measured." THEOREM 1: The speed of light obeys the equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) if and only if, in the absence of a gravitational field, it obeys the equation c'=c+v where v is the speed of the emitter relative to the observer. Both equations belong to Newton's emission theory of light and contradict Einstein's 1905 light postulate: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ "...light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body." THEOREM 2 (The Redshift Law): If the assumption that the wavelength of light varies with the speed of the observer is absurd, then the following unversal equation holds: f'/f = c'/c where f' is the shifted frequency of light (at the moment of reception), f is the original frequency (at the moment of emission), c' is the speed of light relative to the observer (at the moment of reception), c is the speed of light relative to the emitter (at the moment of emission). Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT: FUNDAMENTAL THEOREMS
On Apr 27, 2:33*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae13.cfm "So, it is absolutely true that the speed of light is not constant in a gravitational field [which, by the equivalence principle, applies as well to accelerating (non-inertial) frames of reference]. If this were not so, there would be no bending of light by the gravitational field of stars....Indeed, this is exactly how Einstein did the calculation in: 'On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light,' Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911. which predated the full formal development of general relativity by about four years. This paper is widely available in English. You can find a copy beginning on page 99 of the Dover book 'The Principle of Relativity.' You will find in section 3 of that paper, Einstein's derivation of the (variable) speed of light in a gravitational potential, eqn (3). The result is, c' = c0 ( 1 + V / c^2 ) where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the speed of light c0 is measured." Forget all the nonsense of (1 + V/cc), all that is rubbish. The only formula that matters is the most basic one, which was unknown till I published it around 2000 e = 0.5mv^2N(N-k) and this formula explains all the manifestations of energy. THEOREM 1: The speed of light obeys the equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) if and only if, in the absence of a gravitational field, it obeys the equation c'=c+v where v is the speed of the emitter relative to the observer. Both equations belong to Newton's emission theory of light and contradict Einstein's 1905 light postulate: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/"...light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body." THEOREM 2 (The Redshift Law): If the assumption that the wavelength of light varies with the speed of the observer is absurd, then the following unversal equation holds: f'/f = c'/c It is like: F = f + del(f) = (c + V)/lambda = c/lambda + V/lambda, where lambda is the wavelenth and V is the relative velocity between source and receiver or f + del(f) = f + V/lambda, as f = c/lambda or def(f) = V/lambda Cheers, Arindam Banerjee where f' is the shifted frequency of light (at the moment of reception), f is the original frequency (at the moment of emission), c' is the speed of light relative to the observer (at the moment of reception), c is the speed of light relative to the emitter (at the moment of emission). Pentcho Valev |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Film about dead monkeys wins Oscars
Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae13.cfm "So, it is absolutely true that the speed of light is not constant in a gravitational field [which, by the equivalence principle, applies as well to accelerating (non-inertial) frames of reference]. If this were not so, there would be no bending of light by the gravitational field of stars....Indeed, this is exactly how Einstein did the calculation in: 'On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light,' Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911. which predated the full formal development of general relativity by about four years. This paper is widely available in English. You can find a copy beginning on page 99 of the Dover book 'The Principle of Relativity.' You will find in section 3 of that paper, Einstein's derivation of the (variable) speed of light in a gravitational potential, eqn (3). The result is, c' = c0 ( 1 + V / c^2 ) where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the speed of light c0 is measured." THEOREM 1: The speed of light obeys the equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) if and only if, in the absence of a gravitational field, it obeys the equation c'=c+v where v is the speed of the emitter relative to the observer. Both equations belong to Newton's emission theory of light and contradict Einstein's 1905 light postulate: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ "...light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body." THEOREM 2 (The Redshift Law): If the assumption that the wavelength of light varies with the speed of the observer is absurd, then the following unversal equation holds: f'/f = c'/c where f' is the shifted frequency of light (at the moment of reception), f is the original frequency (at the moment of emission), c' is the speed of light relative to the observer (at the moment of reception), c is the speed of light relative to the emitter (at the moment of emission). Pentcho Valev |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Film about dead monkeys wins Oscars
On Apr 27, 12:47*am, John Jones wrote:
Pentcho Valev wrote: http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae13.cfm "So, it is absolutely true that the speed of light is not constant in a gravitational field [which, by the equivalence principle, applies as well to accelerating (non-inertial) frames of reference]. If this were not so, there would be no bending of light by the gravitational field of stars....Indeed, this is exactly how Einstein did the calculation in: 'On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light,' Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911. which predated the full formal development of general relativity by about four years. This paper is widely available in English. You can find a copy beginning on page 99 of the Dover book 'The Principle of Relativity.' You will find in section 3 of that paper, Einstein's derivation of the (variable) speed of light in a gravitational potential, eqn (3). The result is, c' = c0 ( 1 + V / c^2 ) where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the speed of light c0 is measured." THEOREM 1: The speed of light obeys the equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) if and only if, in the absence of a gravitational field, it obeys the equation c'=c+v where v is the speed of the emitter relative to the observer. Both equations belong to Newton's emission theory of light and contradict Einstein's 1905 light postulate: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/"...light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body." THEOREM 2 (The Redshift Law): If the assumption that the wavelength of light varies with the speed of the observer is absurd, then the following unversal equation holds: f'/f = c'/c where f' is the shifted frequency of light (at the moment of reception), f is the original frequency (at the moment of emission), c' is the speed of light relative to the observer (at the moment of reception), c is the speed of light relative to the emitter (at the moment of emission). Pentcho Valev - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I saw that movie! It was great. And Brittney Spears even flashed some nips. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT: FUNDAMENTAL THEOREMS
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...barn_pole.html
"These are the props. You own a barn, 40m long, with automatic doors at either end, that can be opened and closed simultaneously by a switch. You also have a pole, 80m long, which of course won't fit in the barn. Now someone takes the pole and tries to run (at nearly the speed of light) through the barn with the pole horizontal. Special Relativity (SR) says that a moving object is contracted in the direction of motion: this is called the Lorentz Contraction. So, if the pole is set in motion lengthwise, then it will contract in the reference frame of a stationary observer.....So, as the pole passes through the barn, there is an instant when it is completely within the barn. At that instant, you close both doors simultaneously, with your switch. Of course, you open them again pretty quickly, but at least momentarily you had the contracted pole shut up in your barn. The runner emerges from the far door unscathed.....If the doors are kept shut the rod will obviously smash into the barn door at one end. If the door withstands this the leading end of the rod will come to rest in the frame of reference of the stationary observer. There can be no such thing as a rigid rod in relativity so the trailing end will not stop immediately and the rod will be compressed beyond the amount it was Lorentz contracted. If it does not explode under the strain and it is sufficiently elastic it will come to rest and start to spring back to its natural shape but since it is too big for the barn the other end is now going to crash into the back door and the rod will be trapped in a compressed state inside the barn." THEOREM 3: If the assumption that an infinitely long object can be trapped inside an infinitely short container is absurd, then the speed of light, c, varies with the speed of the emitter, v, in accordance with the equation c'=c+v given by Newton's emission theory of light. Pentcho Valev wrote: http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae13.cfm "So, it is absolutely true that the speed of light is not constant in a gravitational field [which, by the equivalence principle, applies as well to accelerating (non-inertial) frames of reference]. If this were not so, there would be no bending of light by the gravitational field of stars....Indeed, this is exactly how Einstein did the calculation in: 'On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light,' Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911. which predated the full formal development of general relativity by about four years. This paper is widely available in English. You can find a copy beginning on page 99 of the Dover book 'The Principle of Relativity.' You will find in section 3 of that paper, Einstein's derivation of the (variable) speed of light in a gravitational potential, eqn (3). The result is, c' = c0 ( 1 + V / c^2 ) where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the speed of light c0 is measured." THEOREM 1: The speed of light obeys the equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) if and only if, in the absence of a gravitational field, it obeys the equation c'=c+v where v is the speed of the emitter relative to the observer. Both equations belong to Newton's emission theory of light and contradict Einstein's 1905 light postulate: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ "...light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body." THEOREM 2 (The Redshift Law): If the assumption that the wavelength of light varies with the speed of the observer is absurd, then the following unversal equation holds: f'/f = c'/c where f' is the shifted frequency of light (at the moment of reception), f is the original frequency (at the moment of emission), c' is the speed of light relative to the observer (at the moment of reception), c is the speed of light relative to the emitter (at the moment of emission). Pentcho Valev |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Please donate here to the RSDM charity 'The Royal Society for DiseasedMonkeys' (by Appointment to the Crown)
Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae13.cfm "So, it is absolutely true that the speed of light is not constant in a gravitational field [which, by the equivalence principle, applies as well to accelerating (non-inertial) frames of reference]. If this were not so, there would be no bending of light by the gravitational field of stars....Indeed, this is exactly how Einstein did the calculation in: 'On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light,' Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911. which predated the full formal development of general relativity by about four years. This paper is widely available in English. You can find a copy beginning on page 99 of the Dover book 'The Principle of Relativity.' You will find in section 3 of that paper, Einstein's derivation of the (variable) speed of light in a gravitational potential, eqn (3). The result is, c' = c0 ( 1 + V / c^2 ) where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the speed of light c0 is measured." THEOREM 1: The speed of light obeys the equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) if and only if, in the absence of a gravitational field, it obeys the equation c'=c+v where v is the speed of the emitter relative to the observer. Both equations belong to Newton's emission theory of light and contradict Einstein's 1905 light postulate: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ "...light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body." THEOREM 2 (The Redshift Law): If the assumption that the wavelength of light varies with the speed of the observer is absurd, then the following unversal equation holds: f'/f = c'/c where f' is the shifted frequency of light (at the moment of reception), f is the original frequency (at the moment of emission), c' is the speed of light relative to the observer (at the moment of reception), c is the speed of light relative to the emitter (at the moment of emission). Pentcho Valev |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT: FUNDAMENTAL THEOREMS
A rocket of length h accelerates with acceleration g. An emitter at
the front end sends light towards an observer at the back end. At the moment of emission the frequency is f and the speed of light relative to the emitter is c. At the moment of reception the observer measures the frequency to be f'=f(1+gh/c^2). THEOREM 4: If the assumption that the wavelength varies with position is absurd, then, at the moment of reception, the speed of light relative to the observer is: c' = c(1+gh/c^2) = c+v where v is the speed of the emitter (at the moment of emission) relative to the observer (at the moment of reception). The result is consistent with Newton's emission theory of light and refutes Einstein's special relativity. Pentcho Valev wrote: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...barn_pole.html "These are the props. You own a barn, 40m long, with automatic doors at either end, that can be opened and closed simultaneously by a switch. You also have a pole, 80m long, which of course won't fit in the barn. Now someone takes the pole and tries to run (at nearly the speed of light) through the barn with the pole horizontal. Special Relativity (SR) says that a moving object is contracted in the direction of motion: this is called the Lorentz Contraction. So, if the pole is set in motion lengthwise, then it will contract in the reference frame of a stationary observer.....So, as the pole passes through the barn, there is an instant when it is completely within the barn. At that instant, you close both doors simultaneously, with your switch. Of course, you open them again pretty quickly, but at least momentarily you had the contracted pole shut up in your barn. The runner emerges from the far door unscathed.....If the doors are kept shut the rod will obviously smash into the barn door at one end. If the door withstands this the leading end of the rod will come to rest in the frame of reference of the stationary observer. There can be no such thing as a rigid rod in relativity so the trailing end will not stop immediately and the rod will be compressed beyond the amount it was Lorentz contracted. If it does not explode under the strain and it is sufficiently elastic it will come to rest and start to spring back to its natural shape but since it is too big for the barn the other end is now going to crash into the back door and the rod will be trapped in a compressed state inside the barn." THEOREM 3: If the assumption that an infinitely long object can be trapped inside an infinitely short container is absurd, then the speed of light, c, varies with the speed of the emitter, v, in accordance with the equation c'=c+v given by Newton's emission theory of light. http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae13.cfm "So, it is absolutely true that the speed of light is not constant in a gravitational field [which, by the equivalence principle, applies as well to accelerating (non-inertial) frames of reference]. If this were not so, there would be no bending of light by the gravitational field of stars....Indeed, this is exactly how Einstein did the calculation in: 'On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light,' Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911. which predated the full formal development of general relativity by about four years. This paper is widely available in English. You can find a copy beginning on page 99 of the Dover book 'The Principle of Relativity.' You will find in section 3 of that paper, Einstein's derivation of the (variable) speed of light in a gravitational potential, eqn (3). The result is, c' = c0 ( 1 + V / c^2 ) where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the speed of light c0 is measured." THEOREM 1: The speed of light obeys the equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) if and only if, in the absence of a gravitational field, it obeys the equation c'=c+v where v is the speed of the emitter relative to the observer. Both equations belong to Newton's emission theory of light and contradict Einstein's 1905 light postulate: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ "...light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body." THEOREM 2 (The Redshift Law): If the assumption that the wavelength of light varies with the speed of the observer is absurd, then the following unversal equation holds: f'/f = c'/c where f' is the shifted frequency of light (at the moment of reception), f is the original frequency (at the moment of emission), c' is the speed of light relative to the observer (at the moment of reception), c is the speed of light relative to the emitter (at the moment of emission). Pentcho Valev |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Pop Star adopts fashionable, diseased incontinent monkey
Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae13.cfm "So, it is absolutely true that the speed of light is not constant in a gravitational field [which, by the equivalence principle, applies as well to accelerating (non-inertial) frames of reference]. If this were not so, there would be no bending of light by the gravitational field of stars....Indeed, this is exactly how Einstein did the calculation in: 'On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light,' Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911. which predated the full formal development of general relativity by about four years. This paper is widely available in English. You can find a copy beginning on page 99 of the Dover book 'The Principle of Relativity.' You will find in section 3 of that paper, Einstein's derivation of the (variable) speed of light in a gravitational potential, eqn (3). The result is, c' = c0 ( 1 + V / c^2 ) where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the speed of light c0 is measured." THEOREM 1: The speed of light obeys the equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) if and only if, in the absence of a gravitational field, it obeys the equation c'=c+v where v is the speed of the emitter relative to the observer. Both equations belong to Newton's emission theory of light and contradict Einstein's 1905 light postulate: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ "...light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body." THEOREM 2 (The Redshift Law): If the assumption that the wavelength of light varies with the speed of the observer is absurd, then the following unversal equation holds: f'/f = c'/c where f' is the shifted frequency of light (at the moment of reception), f is the original frequency (at the moment of emission), c' is the speed of light relative to the observer (at the moment of reception), c is the speed of light relative to the emitter (at the moment of emission). Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ELASTIC WAVELENGTH VERSUS VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 9 | May 3rd 10 08:48 AM |
VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 30 | August 3rd 08 01:10 AM |
Speed of light is variable says Einstein | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 35 | September 20th 07 03:23 AM |
Speed of light is variable says Einstein | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 3 | August 11th 07 09:39 AM |
Speed of light is variable says Einstein | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 11th 07 09:22 AM |