A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIET missions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old March 28th 08, 03:17 AM posted to sci.space.history
Matt Wiser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 575
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIET

Eric Chomko wrote:

But we will have new data so they'll have to explain how it was faked
and maybe a few will actually believe that we landed after the LRO
encounter. Then again there may be that strange phenomenon where a few
believers become doubters but I suspect that that will bew few and far
in between.


You can count the number who will change their minds on one hand. The ones who
don't change belong in padded cells and straightjackets, IMHO. One of them who infests this
NG certainly belongs in a psych ward. To these nutcases, their conspiracy theory
(or theories) is like a religion; to change any of it because there's evidence that their theory
is just paranoid delusions to them is heresy. Kinda like die-hard communists or socialists
all these years after the Wall came down: they just can't get used to the fact that the Party's
over....The only other way to get them to change their minds is with a two-by-four on their
rear ends.

  #22  
Old March 28th 08, 05:31 AM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIET

Matt Wiser wrote:
Eric Chomko wrote:

But we will have new data so they'll have to explain how it was faked
and maybe a few will actually believe that we landed after the LRO
encounter. Then again there may be that strange phenomenon where a few
believers become doubters but I suspect that that will bew few and far
in between.


You can count the number who will change their minds on one hand. The ones who
don't change belong in padded cells and straightjackets, IMHO. One of them who infests this
NG certainly belongs in a psych ward. To these nutcases, their conspiracy theory
(or theories) is like a religion; to change any of it because there's evidence that their theory
is just paranoid delusions to them is heresy. Kinda like die-hard communists or socialists
all these years after the Wall came down: they just can't get used to the fact that the Party's
over....The only other way to get them to change their minds is with a two-by-four on their
rear ends.


So, you obviously don't like having to use those pesky regular laws of
physics, or any of the best peer replicated science outside of your
NASA/.Apollo cult. Is that why the planet Venus was always
invisible?
.. - Brad Guth
  #23  
Old March 28th 08, 05:38 AM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

On Mar 27, 5:36 pm, Eric Chomko wrote:
On Mar 27, 3:10 pm, BradGuth wrote:



On Mar 27, 10:04 am, Eric Chomko wrote:


On Mar 27, 12:54 pm, Michael Gallagher wrote:


On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:17:13 -0500, J Waggoner
wrote:


.... We all know
that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked .....


Exactly, so don't get your hopes up.


But we will have new data so they'll have to explain how it was faked
and maybe a few will actually believe that we landed after the LRO
encounter. Then again there may be that strange phenomenon where a few
believers become doubters but I suspect that that will bew few and far
in between.


Independent interpreted data that's peer replicated outside of your
hocus-pocus NASA isn't a problem, and never has been.


Brad, do you think that the Russians, who have sent numerous probes
and rovers to the moon, would allow the US nemisis to start/continue
with an Apollo ruse without exposing the farce?


Last I heard, it still takes two to tango.


What exactly do you want? If JAXA/Selene jibes with LRO, and proves
that we did in fact put 12 white men on the moon, will you then
repent?


Of course, but why the hell not having those 100mm resolution images
as of 10, 20 or even 30 years ago?

BTW, why not a robotic science platform of instruments within the
moon's L1, as such a deployment wouldn't have cost us 1% of those
Apollo missions, and to think the moon's L1 thing (with upgrades)
would still be ticking along as of 40 years and counting.
.. - Brad Guth

  #24  
Old March 30th 08, 05:53 AM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

On Mar 22, 9:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote:
When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this
fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all
probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions.
This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed
remnants. Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on
display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! We all know
that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the
open minded, the more evidence the merrier....

On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said
Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary
Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC).

Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's
sightseeing abilities should set the record straight.
Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship

VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration
Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018.

LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That
includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch
down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent
Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC
see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson
told SPACE.com.

"We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages
sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the
overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve
such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see
the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said.

Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky,
LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the
Moon's crater-pocked terrain.

Heading "Down Memory Lane"
Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html


Why all the missing Usenet page after page of those NASA Apollo moon
landing topics?

Why all the smut and porn related topics with having incorporated key
words of NASA, Apollo, moon landing and even hoax?

Mythbustin' the Moon Hoax
"Update: I've been told the episode does not air April 25. The air
date has not been set yet, but I'll make sure I announce it when it
is!"

· # Forreston 17 Mar 2008 at 11:55 am "I wonder if this will ever be
aired. It would be interesting to find out what they prove or
disprove. After seeing the air date change to TBA, I wonder just how
much was a hoax!"

http://www.duggback.com/space/Mythbu...anding_hoaxes/

Unfortunately, this forever ongoing infowar of supposed Apollo moon
landing hoax Mythbustin' doesn't bother to cover several of the most
important and easily peer replicated factors, that'll just as easily
prove our NASA/Apollo wizards never set a human footprint on the
moon. Remember, if they had absolute proof positive on behalf of all
that's NASA/Apollo, as such it would have been mainstream published
along with multiple peer replicated support that's entirely
independent from any sort of NASA or other government loot or
background moderation. Unfortunately, not even Google/NOVA is the
least bit independent.
. - Brad Guth
  #25  
Old March 30th 08, 06:26 PM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

It seems there's still too much that's cloak and dagger worthy or that
of ongoing disinformation and the exclusion of evidence that's ongoing
about our moon, as to not perceive that we're being officially
snookered and otherwise dumbfounded to death by our very own rabbi
kind.

MOM (Motive, Opportunity and Means) = USA/USSR race to the moon

Like most everything published of our NASA/Apollo moon landing,
everything on the following NASA page is either a lie or an exclusion
of whatever evidence that's the least bit contrary to their agenda.
It is not the least bit unusual for governments or of their brown-
nosed minions to lie, because it is so often of what they do best.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm
http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/NOT_faked/

Each and every unfiltered Kodak moment as supposedly obtained while on
the moon is bogus/fake, and as such are only too easily proven as
such without hardly a fight because, peer replicated science as based
upon the regular laws of physics is what works perfectly each and
every time. Oddly their own Kodak partners in crimes against humanity
refuse to step into this NASA/Apollo cesspool O-Ring cult of fire.

There is more than a dozen specifics about such fly-by-rocket
technology, photographics, as well as that of physical and
environmental considerations that simply would not hold up in any
actual court of law if required to support the official record. But
then we all know as a matter of fact that our government does not play
by any set of fair rules, whereas even those rules of their own making
are freely skewed in order to suit or otherwise banish whatever the
situation demands.

The list of viable topics as fair arguments can be as short or as long
as you like, but remember that uncovering only one lie need be the
case of proving without possible doubt that we humans have not walked
on our physically dark moon as officially scripted by our NASA, or of
having been robotically traveled upon as touted by the USSR/Russian
side of this tango. There's also the forever orchestrated clownism
swarm of internet/usenet agents (aka spooks and moles) doing their
usual cloak and dagger thing, of stalking authors for the intent of
making topics that do not fully support the mainstream status quo as
muddy and/or as clownish and otherwise as smut polluted topics as
possible. Even hundreds of intentionally bogus topics of pure
gibberish smut incorporating key wordage as NASA, Apollo, moon
landing, fake and hoax have been created and posted by those in charge
of their PR damage-control, which seems downright silly and otherwise
extremely odd as to why they'd have to resort or otherwise allow such
childish and adult porn tactics.

With an existing overkill worth of efficient spysat imaging resolution
of that very same era, and of far better resolution since, seems
rather odd that such continued and robotically affordable science
gathering of absolutely terrific (0.1 m) resolution, and even capable
of full/extended tri-color spectrum details on behalf of mineral and
deposit mapping as rather easily obtained from a close lunar orbit,
was never accomplished to the degree technically possible by our crack
MI5/CIA/NSA and Air Force spy-masters of our mutually perpetrated cold-
war era, as well as recently JAXA/Selene has been place into a no-win
situation so that their HDTV color and other high resolution images
are officially taboo/nondisclosure rated (in other words, officially
excluded by command of our NASA), as though there is either a little
too much of ET worthy information that they either don't want us to
see, or perhaps it's simply because there's still nothing to see of
exactly where there should have been lots of our Apollo stuff.

So, because there's so much of truth and consequences to select from,
where do we start?
.. - Brad Guth
  #26  
Old April 5th 08, 01:38 AM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

On Mar 22, 9:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote:
When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this
fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all
probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions.
This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed
remnants. Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on
display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! We all know
that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the
open minded, the more evidence the merrier....

On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said
Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary
Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC).

Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's
sightseeing abilities should set the record straight.
Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship

VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration
Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018.

LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That
includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch
down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent
Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC
see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson
told SPACE.com.

"We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages
sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the
overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve
such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see
the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said.

Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky,
LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the
Moon's crater-pocked terrain.

Heading "Down Memory Lane"
Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html


30 pages and counting, of Google search for - moon hoax - and "sort by
date" that's all chuck full of damage control crapolla, of whatever
those silly brown-nosed clowns can post and continually get away with
such posting.

Perhaps the news media or those of most any publication worth at least
half its salt should just call 253-8576061 and talk directly with
myself.
.. - Brad Guth
  #27  
Old April 6th 08, 07:47 PM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

Here's more of my same old dyslexic encrypted rant, as unavoidably
polished a wee bit extra by way of Wikipedia and the JAXA/Selene
mission that's currently in hiding from those NASA/Apollo MIB.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albedo
"The overall albedo of the Moon is around 7%", obviously of less than
7% at low sunset/sunrise angles and otherwise of greater than 7% at
high noon. A typical unfiltered Kodak moment on the moon while solar
illuminated would be similar to that of recording an open-pit coal
mine. That same Kodak moment using a polarized optical element would
thereby record the physically dark moon as though looking much darker
than a open-pit coal mine as viewed by the unfiltered or naked human
eye.

Of flat/calm water with the sun at 55 degrees being worth an albedo of
less than 5% w/o polarizing element, and of nearly zero albedo when
taken along with the polarizing element. Go figure as to why so much
of our NASA/Apollo moon looked so unusually 0.650.75 light-gray, to
nearly as moonsuit white for as far as their unfiltered Kodak eye
could see, as though looking exactly of what a terrestrial xenon arc
lamp spectrum illuminated guano island would have recorded upon that
exact same film, using the same camera and lens.

Oddly the JAXA/Selene mission hasn't identified any such highly
reflective locations, and of far superior cameras and superior band-
pass coated optics was still getting that bluish saturation of what
the raw UV energy creates as secondary/recoil photons, so much so
bluish that those images of Earth had the moon's color pixels
nullified into their monochrome version, of essentially being those of
gray-tone pixels of nearly a B&W format, of which at least they'd
eliminated that pesky bluish color saturation factor.

Unfortunately, the Adobe Flash image player used by the JAXA/
KAGUYA(Selene) team is downright pathetic for their image gallery, of
extremely poor resolution and even at that being terribly slow to
load.
http://www.isas.jaxa.jp/e/enterp/mis...ya/index.shtml

For some reason those terrific 10 meter resolution images and of such
extremely good DR(dynamic range) that's at least 10 fold better than
film, as such hasn't recorded upon any of those unusually bright NASA/
Apollo worthy pixel as otherwise surrounded by all the other coal like
physically dark pixels. Their first HDTV images upon arrival are
going to be harder to locate, because those were of the full color
spectrum that included the moon as looking so typically bluish (as it
should).

Notice how the moon's color saturation has been artificially reduced
down next to zilch, as well as their using minimal DR(dynamic) within
these following images.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/200..._e.html#pict02

The JAXA index_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/index_e.html
Notice the strong bluish color saturation worth of their HDTV look at
Earth.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071001_kaguya_e.html

Look once again at those original color images as obtained by their
quality cameras and bandpass coated optics, as looking so gosh darn
blue saturated.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071009_kaguya_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf

Since those few above images were released for public review, it seems
all the images released since are of those having their color
saturation pixels of that physically dark moon modified so as to
depict the moon as a rather dull charcoal grayish surface that's
entirely devoid of any worthy mineral deposits of color, or that of
having to show any of that pesky secondary/recoil worth of bluish
color saturation. What the hell gives? and where's the 10 meter
resolution look-see at those NASA/Apollo landing sites?

This next page of images includes "Figure 1 First Image taken by the
KAGUYA MI" is one of their artificial color saturated examples that's
created by way of their new and improved image science.

"The color image of the Moon (quasi color image) was composed by
applying red, green and blue respectively to three bands, namely
900nm, 700nm and 415nm, of the nine bands of MI." (notice how strong
their 415nm (blue) spectrum saturation is)
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071116_kaguya_e.html

Of course, of what little we're given to look at isn't even worth 0.1%
of images in the JAXA/KAGUYA(Selene) archives. If you were trying to
hide something on behalf of supporting the NASA/Apollo ruse and/or
hoax of their moon landings, this JAXA method of excluding the vast
bulk of images and/or of intentionally skewing the color and DR
saturation of those few were allowed to see (in order to suit all
things NASA/Apollo), is exactly how you'd have to go about doing it.
.. - Brad Guth

On Mar 22, 10:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote:
When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this
fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all
probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions.
This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed
remnants. Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on
display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! We all know
that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the
open minded, the more evidence the merrier....

On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said
Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary
Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC).

Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's
sightseeing abilities should set the record straight.
Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship

VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration
Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018.

LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That
includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch
down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent
Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC
see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson
told SPACE.com.

"We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages
sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the
overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve
such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see
the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said.

Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky,
LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the
Moon's crater-pocked terrain.

Heading "Down Memory Lane"
Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html


Top posted, so that you silly folks don't miss a darn thing.
.. - BG
  #28  
Old April 11th 08, 11:46 PM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

On Mar 22, 10:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote:
When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this
fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all
probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions.
This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed
remnants. Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on
display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! We all know
that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the
open minded, the more evidence the merrier....

On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said
Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary
Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC).

Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's
sightseeing abilities should set the record straight.
Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship

VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration
Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018.

LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That
includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch
down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent
Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC
see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson
told SPACE.com.

"We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages
sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the
overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve
such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see
the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said.

Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky,
LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the
Moon's crater-pocked terrain.

Heading "Down Memory Lane"
Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html


Mythbusters should also check this one out.

Now we're being so kindly informed once again, and this time by the
warm and fuzzy plus otherwise wizardly likes of Eric Chomko, as well
as from the full swarm like support of all else that's Borg like pro-
NASA, that of whatever albedo is actually dependent upon the viewing
distance, and even as much as not hardly worth mentioning as having to
do with the angle of solar illumination.

Phobos in color and 3D http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...5c3250f?hl=en#

Apparently, even sunrise or sunset angles of local illumination for
Eric Chomko only increases the reflective nature of a given surface
that's otherwise on average nearly coal like, especially of those
pesky off-world kinds of places that simply don't have to play by
those pesky regular laws of physics, and to make things a whole lot
worse, is if using a polarized optical element gives the local terrain
of our moon yet another minimum boost of 2:1 or greater albedo. No
wonder that NASA/Apollo moon looked so EVA locally reflective, as
though exactly like a certain 0.65~0.75 albedo worth of a guano
island, as well as for why those various colors of known items looked
exactly as though having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated.

I don't want others to think that I'm nearly as smart as Eric Chomko,
although actual terrestrial coal seems smarter than Eric, not to
mention corporate Kodak or any other commercial film supplier. Of
course, we all know that not one outside living soul (meaning other
than dominated by and/or in debt to NASA/Apollo) has ever set their
naked eye or much less of any perfectly failsafe (meaning zero harm)
digital scanner upon any one of all those thousands of NASA/Apollo
mission related Kodak moments.

If some of us didn't know better, you'd think our NASA and of those
having "the right stuff" were trying really hard to hide something.
.. - Brad Guth
  #29  
Old April 26th 08, 05:03 AM posted to sci.space.history
Scott Hedrick[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,159
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIET missions


"J Waggoner" wrote in message
...
Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's
sightseeing abilities should set the record straight.


Why? They'll claim those images were faked as well.

Don't make the assumption that *data* is the issue here. They have *faith*
that the moon landings were a hoax, and any data to the contrary is
obviously faked.


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
  #30  
Old April 26th 08, 07:10 AM posted to sci.space.history
J Waggoner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 66
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIET missions

Frankly if you want to embarrass yourself go ahead. The Chinese
certainly haven't come out and said we didn't land either. and in 1968
BEFORE Nixon visited were supporting the North Vietnamese....

So are you saying NASA duped Mao Tse Dung and Leonid Breshnev ?

AND ANSWER THAT QUESTION DON"T AVOID IT )



On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:46:51 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
wrote:

On Mar 22, 10:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote:
When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this
fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all
probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions.
This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed
remnants. Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on
display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! We all know
that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the
open minded, the more evidence the merrier....

On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said
Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary
Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC).

Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's
sightseeing abilities should set the record straight.
Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship

VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration
Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018.

LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That
includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch
down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent
Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC
see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson
told SPACE.com.

"We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages
sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the
overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve
such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see
the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said.

Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky,
LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the
Moon's crater-pocked terrain.

Heading "Down Memory Lane"
Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html


Mythbusters should also check this one out.

Now we're being so kindly informed once again, and this time by the
warm and fuzzy plus otherwise wizardly likes of Eric Chomko, as well
as from the full swarm like support of all else that's Borg like pro-
NASA, that of whatever albedo is actually dependent upon the viewing
distance, and even as much as not hardly worth mentioning as having to
do with the angle of solar illumination.

Phobos in color and 3D http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...5c3250f?hl=en#

Apparently, even sunrise or sunset angles of local illumination for
Eric Chomko only increases the reflective nature of a given surface
that's otherwise on average nearly coal like, especially of those
pesky off-world kinds of places that simply don't have to play by
those pesky regular laws of physics, and to make things a whole lot
worse, is if using a polarized optical element gives the local terrain
of our moon yet another minimum boost of 2:1 or greater albedo. No
wonder that NASA/Apollo moon looked so EVA locally reflective, as
though exactly like a certain 0.65~0.75 albedo worth of a guano
island, as well as for why those various colors of known items looked
exactly as though having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated.

I don't want others to think that I'm nearly as smart as Eric Chomko,
although actual terrestrial coal seems smarter than Eric, not to
mention corporate Kodak or any other commercial film supplier. Of
course, we all know that not one outside living soul (meaning other
than dominated by and/or in debt to NASA/Apollo) has ever set their
naked eye or much less of any perfectly failsafe (meaning zero harm)
digital scanner upon any one of all those thousands of NASA/Apollo
mission related Kodak moments.

If some of us didn't know better, you'd think our NASA and of those
having "the right stuff" were trying really hard to hide something.
. - Brad Guth


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MOON LANDING HOAX RELIGIOUS "later that it was all a hoax" [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 4 June 7th 05 01:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.