|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIET
Eric Chomko wrote:
But we will have new data so they'll have to explain how it was faked and maybe a few will actually believe that we landed after the LRO encounter. Then again there may be that strange phenomenon where a few believers become doubters but I suspect that that will bew few and far in between. You can count the number who will change their minds on one hand. The ones who don't change belong in padded cells and straightjackets, IMHO. One of them who infests this NG certainly belongs in a psych ward. To these nutcases, their conspiracy theory (or theories) is like a religion; to change any of it because there's evidence that their theory is just paranoid delusions to them is heresy. Kinda like die-hard communists or socialists all these years after the Wall came down: they just can't get used to the fact that the Party's over....The only other way to get them to change their minds is with a two-by-four on their rear ends. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIET
Matt Wiser wrote:
Eric Chomko wrote: But we will have new data so they'll have to explain how it was faked and maybe a few will actually believe that we landed after the LRO encounter. Then again there may be that strange phenomenon where a few believers become doubters but I suspect that that will bew few and far in between. You can count the number who will change their minds on one hand. The ones who don't change belong in padded cells and straightjackets, IMHO. One of them who infests this NG certainly belongs in a psych ward. To these nutcases, their conspiracy theory (or theories) is like a religion; to change any of it because there's evidence that their theory is just paranoid delusions to them is heresy. Kinda like die-hard communists or socialists all these years after the Wall came down: they just can't get used to the fact that the Party's over....The only other way to get them to change their minds is with a two-by-four on their rear ends. So, you obviously don't like having to use those pesky regular laws of physics, or any of the best peer replicated science outside of your NASA/.Apollo cult. Is that why the planet Venus was always invisible? .. - Brad Guth |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions
On Mar 27, 5:36 pm, Eric Chomko wrote:
On Mar 27, 3:10 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Mar 27, 10:04 am, Eric Chomko wrote: On Mar 27, 12:54 pm, Michael Gallagher wrote: On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:17:13 -0500, J Waggoner wrote: .... We all know that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked ..... Exactly, so don't get your hopes up. But we will have new data so they'll have to explain how it was faked and maybe a few will actually believe that we landed after the LRO encounter. Then again there may be that strange phenomenon where a few believers become doubters but I suspect that that will bew few and far in between. Independent interpreted data that's peer replicated outside of your hocus-pocus NASA isn't a problem, and never has been. Brad, do you think that the Russians, who have sent numerous probes and rovers to the moon, would allow the US nemisis to start/continue with an Apollo ruse without exposing the farce? Last I heard, it still takes two to tango. What exactly do you want? If JAXA/Selene jibes with LRO, and proves that we did in fact put 12 white men on the moon, will you then repent? Of course, but why the hell not having those 100mm resolution images as of 10, 20 or even 30 years ago? BTW, why not a robotic science platform of instruments within the moon's L1, as such a deployment wouldn't have cost us 1% of those Apollo missions, and to think the moon's L1 thing (with upgrades) would still be ticking along as of 40 years and counting. .. - Brad Guth |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions
On Mar 22, 9:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote:
When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions. This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed remnants. Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! We all know that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the open minded, the more evidence the merrier.... On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC). Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's sightseeing abilities should set the record straight. Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018. LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson told SPACE.com. "We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said. Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky, LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the Moon's crater-pocked terrain. Heading "Down Memory Lane" Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html Why all the missing Usenet page after page of those NASA Apollo moon landing topics? Why all the smut and porn related topics with having incorporated key words of NASA, Apollo, moon landing and even hoax? Mythbustin' the Moon Hoax "Update: I've been told the episode does not air April 25. The air date has not been set yet, but I'll make sure I announce it when it is!" · # Forreston 17 Mar 2008 at 11:55 am "I wonder if this will ever be aired. It would be interesting to find out what they prove or disprove. After seeing the air date change to TBA, I wonder just how much was a hoax!" http://www.duggback.com/space/Mythbu...anding_hoaxes/ Unfortunately, this forever ongoing infowar of supposed Apollo moon landing hoax Mythbustin' doesn't bother to cover several of the most important and easily peer replicated factors, that'll just as easily prove our NASA/Apollo wizards never set a human footprint on the moon. Remember, if they had absolute proof positive on behalf of all that's NASA/Apollo, as such it would have been mainstream published along with multiple peer replicated support that's entirely independent from any sort of NASA or other government loot or background moderation. Unfortunately, not even Google/NOVA is the least bit independent. . - Brad Guth |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions
It seems there's still too much that's cloak and dagger worthy or that
of ongoing disinformation and the exclusion of evidence that's ongoing about our moon, as to not perceive that we're being officially snookered and otherwise dumbfounded to death by our very own rabbi kind. MOM (Motive, Opportunity and Means) = USA/USSR race to the moon Like most everything published of our NASA/Apollo moon landing, everything on the following NASA page is either a lie or an exclusion of whatever evidence that's the least bit contrary to their agenda. It is not the least bit unusual for governments or of their brown- nosed minions to lie, because it is so often of what they do best. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/NOT_faked/ Each and every unfiltered Kodak moment as supposedly obtained while on the moon is bogus/fake, and as such are only too easily proven as such without hardly a fight because, peer replicated science as based upon the regular laws of physics is what works perfectly each and every time. Oddly their own Kodak partners in crimes against humanity refuse to step into this NASA/Apollo cesspool O-Ring cult of fire. There is more than a dozen specifics about such fly-by-rocket technology, photographics, as well as that of physical and environmental considerations that simply would not hold up in any actual court of law if required to support the official record. But then we all know as a matter of fact that our government does not play by any set of fair rules, whereas even those rules of their own making are freely skewed in order to suit or otherwise banish whatever the situation demands. The list of viable topics as fair arguments can be as short or as long as you like, but remember that uncovering only one lie need be the case of proving without possible doubt that we humans have not walked on our physically dark moon as officially scripted by our NASA, or of having been robotically traveled upon as touted by the USSR/Russian side of this tango. There's also the forever orchestrated clownism swarm of internet/usenet agents (aka spooks and moles) doing their usual cloak and dagger thing, of stalking authors for the intent of making topics that do not fully support the mainstream status quo as muddy and/or as clownish and otherwise as smut polluted topics as possible. Even hundreds of intentionally bogus topics of pure gibberish smut incorporating key wordage as NASA, Apollo, moon landing, fake and hoax have been created and posted by those in charge of their PR damage-control, which seems downright silly and otherwise extremely odd as to why they'd have to resort or otherwise allow such childish and adult porn tactics. With an existing overkill worth of efficient spysat imaging resolution of that very same era, and of far better resolution since, seems rather odd that such continued and robotically affordable science gathering of absolutely terrific (0.1 m) resolution, and even capable of full/extended tri-color spectrum details on behalf of mineral and deposit mapping as rather easily obtained from a close lunar orbit, was never accomplished to the degree technically possible by our crack MI5/CIA/NSA and Air Force spy-masters of our mutually perpetrated cold- war era, as well as recently JAXA/Selene has been place into a no-win situation so that their HDTV color and other high resolution images are officially taboo/nondisclosure rated (in other words, officially excluded by command of our NASA), as though there is either a little too much of ET worthy information that they either don't want us to see, or perhaps it's simply because there's still nothing to see of exactly where there should have been lots of our Apollo stuff. So, because there's so much of truth and consequences to select from, where do we start? .. - Brad Guth |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions
On Mar 22, 9:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote:
When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions. This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed remnants. Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! We all know that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the open minded, the more evidence the merrier.... On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC). Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's sightseeing abilities should set the record straight. Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018. LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson told SPACE.com. "We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said. Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky, LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the Moon's crater-pocked terrain. Heading "Down Memory Lane" Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html 30 pages and counting, of Google search for - moon hoax - and "sort by date" that's all chuck full of damage control crapolla, of whatever those silly brown-nosed clowns can post and continually get away with such posting. Perhaps the news media or those of most any publication worth at least half its salt should just call 253-8576061 and talk directly with myself. .. - Brad Guth |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions
Here's more of my same old dyslexic encrypted rant, as unavoidably
polished a wee bit extra by way of Wikipedia and the JAXA/Selene mission that's currently in hiding from those NASA/Apollo MIB. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albedo "The overall albedo of the Moon is around 7%", obviously of less than 7% at low sunset/sunrise angles and otherwise of greater than 7% at high noon. A typical unfiltered Kodak moment on the moon while solar illuminated would be similar to that of recording an open-pit coal mine. That same Kodak moment using a polarized optical element would thereby record the physically dark moon as though looking much darker than a open-pit coal mine as viewed by the unfiltered or naked human eye. Of flat/calm water with the sun at 55 degrees being worth an albedo of less than 5% w/o polarizing element, and of nearly zero albedo when taken along with the polarizing element. Go figure as to why so much of our NASA/Apollo moon looked so unusually 0.650.75 light-gray, to nearly as moonsuit white for as far as their unfiltered Kodak eye could see, as though looking exactly of what a terrestrial xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated guano island would have recorded upon that exact same film, using the same camera and lens. Oddly the JAXA/Selene mission hasn't identified any such highly reflective locations, and of far superior cameras and superior band- pass coated optics was still getting that bluish saturation of what the raw UV energy creates as secondary/recoil photons, so much so bluish that those images of Earth had the moon's color pixels nullified into their monochrome version, of essentially being those of gray-tone pixels of nearly a B&W format, of which at least they'd eliminated that pesky bluish color saturation factor. Unfortunately, the Adobe Flash image player used by the JAXA/ KAGUYA(Selene) team is downright pathetic for their image gallery, of extremely poor resolution and even at that being terribly slow to load. http://www.isas.jaxa.jp/e/enterp/mis...ya/index.shtml For some reason those terrific 10 meter resolution images and of such extremely good DR(dynamic range) that's at least 10 fold better than film, as such hasn't recorded upon any of those unusually bright NASA/ Apollo worthy pixel as otherwise surrounded by all the other coal like physically dark pixels. Their first HDTV images upon arrival are going to be harder to locate, because those were of the full color spectrum that included the moon as looking so typically bluish (as it should). Notice how the moon's color saturation has been artificially reduced down next to zilch, as well as their using minimal DR(dynamic) within these following images. http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/200..._e.html#pict02 The JAXA index_e.html http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/index_e.html Notice the strong bluish color saturation worth of their HDTV look at Earth. http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071001_kaguya_e.html Look once again at those original color images as obtained by their quality cameras and bandpass coated optics, as looking so gosh darn blue saturated. http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071009_kaguya_e.html http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf Since those few above images were released for public review, it seems all the images released since are of those having their color saturation pixels of that physically dark moon modified so as to depict the moon as a rather dull charcoal grayish surface that's entirely devoid of any worthy mineral deposits of color, or that of having to show any of that pesky secondary/recoil worth of bluish color saturation. What the hell gives? and where's the 10 meter resolution look-see at those NASA/Apollo landing sites? This next page of images includes "Figure 1 First Image taken by the KAGUYA MI" is one of their artificial color saturated examples that's created by way of their new and improved image science. "The color image of the Moon (quasi color image) was composed by applying red, green and blue respectively to three bands, namely 900nm, 700nm and 415nm, of the nine bands of MI." (notice how strong their 415nm (blue) spectrum saturation is) http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071116_kaguya_e.html Of course, of what little we're given to look at isn't even worth 0.1% of images in the JAXA/KAGUYA(Selene) archives. If you were trying to hide something on behalf of supporting the NASA/Apollo ruse and/or hoax of their moon landings, this JAXA method of excluding the vast bulk of images and/or of intentionally skewing the color and DR saturation of those few were allowed to see (in order to suit all things NASA/Apollo), is exactly how you'd have to go about doing it. .. - Brad Guth On Mar 22, 10:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote: When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions. This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed remnants. Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! We all know that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the open minded, the more evidence the merrier.... On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC). Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's sightseeing abilities should set the record straight. Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018. LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson told SPACE.com. "We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said. Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky, LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the Moon's crater-pocked terrain. Heading "Down Memory Lane" Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html Top posted, so that you silly folks don't miss a darn thing. .. - BG |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions
On Mar 22, 10:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote:
When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions. This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed remnants. Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! We all know that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the open minded, the more evidence the merrier.... On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC). Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's sightseeing abilities should set the record straight. Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018. LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson told SPACE.com. "We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said. Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky, LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the Moon's crater-pocked terrain. Heading "Down Memory Lane" Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html Mythbusters should also check this one out. Now we're being so kindly informed once again, and this time by the warm and fuzzy plus otherwise wizardly likes of Eric Chomko, as well as from the full swarm like support of all else that's Borg like pro- NASA, that of whatever albedo is actually dependent upon the viewing distance, and even as much as not hardly worth mentioning as having to do with the angle of solar illumination. Phobos in color and 3D http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...5c3250f?hl=en# Apparently, even sunrise or sunset angles of local illumination for Eric Chomko only increases the reflective nature of a given surface that's otherwise on average nearly coal like, especially of those pesky off-world kinds of places that simply don't have to play by those pesky regular laws of physics, and to make things a whole lot worse, is if using a polarized optical element gives the local terrain of our moon yet another minimum boost of 2:1 or greater albedo. No wonder that NASA/Apollo moon looked so EVA locally reflective, as though exactly like a certain 0.65~0.75 albedo worth of a guano island, as well as for why those various colors of known items looked exactly as though having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated. I don't want others to think that I'm nearly as smart as Eric Chomko, although actual terrestrial coal seems smarter than Eric, not to mention corporate Kodak or any other commercial film supplier. Of course, we all know that not one outside living soul (meaning other than dominated by and/or in debt to NASA/Apollo) has ever set their naked eye or much less of any perfectly failsafe (meaning zero harm) digital scanner upon any one of all those thousands of NASA/Apollo mission related Kodak moments. If some of us didn't know better, you'd think our NASA and of those having "the right stuff" were trying really hard to hide something. .. - Brad Guth |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIET missions
"J Waggoner" wrote in message ... Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's sightseeing abilities should set the record straight. Why? They'll claim those images were faked as well. Don't make the assumption that *data* is the issue here. They have *faith* that the moon landings were a hoax, and any data to the contrary is obviously faked. ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIET missions
Frankly if you want to embarrass yourself go ahead. The Chinese
certainly haven't come out and said we didn't land either. and in 1968 BEFORE Nixon visited were supporting the North Vietnamese.... So are you saying NASA duped Mao Tse Dung and Leonid Breshnev ? AND ANSWER THAT QUESTION DON"T AVOID IT ) On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:46:51 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth wrote: On Mar 22, 10:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote: When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions. This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed remnants. Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! We all know that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the open minded, the more evidence the merrier.... On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC). Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's sightseeing abilities should set the record straight. Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018. LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson told SPACE.com. "We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said. Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky, LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the Moon's crater-pocked terrain. Heading "Down Memory Lane" Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html Mythbusters should also check this one out. Now we're being so kindly informed once again, and this time by the warm and fuzzy plus otherwise wizardly likes of Eric Chomko, as well as from the full swarm like support of all else that's Borg like pro- NASA, that of whatever albedo is actually dependent upon the viewing distance, and even as much as not hardly worth mentioning as having to do with the angle of solar illumination. Phobos in color and 3D http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...5c3250f?hl=en# Apparently, even sunrise or sunset angles of local illumination for Eric Chomko only increases the reflective nature of a given surface that's otherwise on average nearly coal like, especially of those pesky off-world kinds of places that simply don't have to play by those pesky regular laws of physics, and to make things a whole lot worse, is if using a polarized optical element gives the local terrain of our moon yet another minimum boost of 2:1 or greater albedo. No wonder that NASA/Apollo moon looked so EVA locally reflective, as though exactly like a certain 0.65~0.75 albedo worth of a guano island, as well as for why those various colors of known items looked exactly as though having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated. I don't want others to think that I'm nearly as smart as Eric Chomko, although actual terrestrial coal seems smarter than Eric, not to mention corporate Kodak or any other commercial film supplier. Of course, we all know that not one outside living soul (meaning other than dominated by and/or in debt to NASA/Apollo) has ever set their naked eye or much less of any perfectly failsafe (meaning zero harm) digital scanner upon any one of all those thousands of NASA/Apollo mission related Kodak moments. If some of us didn't know better, you'd think our NASA and of those having "the right stuff" were trying really hard to hide something. . - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MOON LANDING HOAX RELIGIOUS "later that it was all a hoax" | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | June 7th 05 01:38 AM |