 If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.  Paradigm Shift: from Invariable Speed of Light to Invariable Wavelength
 Author Name Remember Me? Password
 Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

## Paradigm Shift: from Invariable Speed of Light to Invariable Wavelength

 Thread Tools Display Modes
#1 March 13th 19, 04:54 PM posted to sci.astro
 Pentcho Valev external usenet poster Posts: 7,085 Paradigm Shift: from Invariable Speed of Light to Invariable Wavelength

The formula

(frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength)

says that a frequency shift entails either a wavelength shift or a speed-of-light shift.

"Any frequency shift entails a wavelength shift" is an implication of Einstein's 1905 axiom "The speed of light is invariable". The implication is obviously absurd - e.g. when the observer (receiver) starts moving towards the light source, the frequency he measures shifts but his motion does not change the wavelength (or the distance between the pulses) of the incoming light:

http://www.einstein-online.info/imag...ector_blue.gif

The absurdity of the implication means that the underlying axiom, "The speed of light is invariable", is false.

"Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a speed-of-light shift" is an implication of the axiom "The wavelength of light is invariable". This axiom is correct and will be fundamental in future physics. Here is an equivalent formulation:

Any light source emits INVARIABLE wavelength.

Einsteinians teach that the wavelength VARIES with the speed of the light source:

Stephen Hawking, "A Brief History of Time", Chapter 3: "Now imagine a source of light at a constant distance from us, such as a star, emitting waves of light at a constant wavelength. Obviously the wavelength of the waves we receive will be the same as the wavelength at which they are emitted (the gravitational field of the galaxy will not be large enough to have a significant effect). Suppose now that the source starts moving toward us. When the source emits the next wave crest it will be nearer to us, so the distance between wave crests will be smaller than when the star was stationary." http://www.fisica.net/relatividade/s...ry_of_time.pdf

The idea that the crests bunch up (the wavelength decreases) in front of the moving source is absurd. We have

(wavelength) = (speed of light as measured by the source)/(frequency as measured by the source)

where (frequency as measured by the source) is obviously independent of the speed of the source. So if the wavelength varied with the speed of the source, then (speed of light as measured by the source) would vary with the speed of the source as well, which is absurd of course.

See Zoe traveling towards Jasper and measuring the speed of light to be always c:

https://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/einste...eird_logic.htm

By using the same device, Zoe measures the wavelength and finds that it is INVARIABLE (independent of Zoe's speed). This means that Jasper measures the speed of light to be c'=c+v, not c.

The speed of light is VARIABLE, the wavelength is INVARIABLE:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D0U6R1RXgAEbxnQ.png

Pentcho Valev
#2 March 14th 19, 09:35 AM posted to sci.astro
 Pentcho Valev external usenet poster Posts: 7,085 Paradigm Shift: from Invariable Speed of Light to Invariable Wavelength

As light falls in gravity, its speed and frequency increase proportionally:

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: "Consider a falling object. ITS SPEED INCREASES AS IT IS FALLING. Hence, if we were to associate a frequency with that object the frequency should increase accordingly as it falls to earth. Because of the equivalence between gravitational and inertial mass, WE SHOULD OBSERVE THE SAME EFFECT FOR LIGHT. So lets shine a light beam from the top of a very tall building. If we can measure the frequency shift as the light beam descends the building, we should be able to discern how gravity affects a falling light beam. This was done by Pound and Rebka in 1960. They shone a light from the top of the Jefferson tower at Harvard and measured the frequency shift." https://courses.physics.illinois.edu...re13/L13r.html

This means that, given the formula (frequency)=(speed of light)/(wavelength), the wavelength of light in a gravitational field is INVARIABLE.

The top of a tower of height h shoots a bullet downwards with initial speed u. As the bullet reaches the ground, its speed (relative to the ground) is

u' = u(1 + gh/u^2)

According to Newton's theory, light falls with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies. Therefore, if the top of the tower emits a light pulse downwards, this pulse will reach the ground with speed

c' = c(1 + gh/c^2)

The frequency an observer on the ground will measure is

f' = c'/Î» = f(1 + gh/c^2)

where Î» is the (invariable) wavelength and f=c/Î» is the initial frequency (as measured at the top of the tower). This frequency shift has been confirmed by the Pound-Rebka experiment.

The above analysis, apart from justifying the axiom

"The wavelength of light is invariable",

proves that gravitational time dilation does not exist - Einstein's general relativity is nonsense.

Pentcho Valev

 Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page Display Modes Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Space Science     Space Science Misc     News     Space Shuttle     Space Station     Science     Technology     Policy     History Astronomy and Astrophysics     Astronomy Misc     Amateur Astronomy     CCD Imaging     Research     FITS     Satellites     Hubble     SETI Others     Astro Pictures     Solar     UK Astronomy     Misc About SpaceBanter     About this forum Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Paradigm Shift: Variable Speed of Light, Invariable Wavelength Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 5 March 9th 19 08:39 AM Invariable Wavelength of Light: the Axiom That Could Resurrect Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 March 7th 19 01:04 AM New Axiom in Fundamental Physics: Invariable Wavelength of Light Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 February 14th 19 04:58 PM Speed of Light Is Not Invariable ; Wavelength of Light Is Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 November 30th 18 03:10 PM Why Einstein Proposed That Speed Of Light Is Invariable.... Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 May 14th 08 07:45 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:43 AM. - Contact Us - SpaceBanter Home - FAQ - Links - Privacy Statement - Top Copyright ©2004-2019 SpaceBanter.com.