#1
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light
On Jul 15, 6:49 pm, Tom Roberts wrote:
When one asks an HISTORICAL question, then such an HISTORICAL answer is equivalent to "word of God". That is indeed a fvcked comment not related to any intellects. shrug For the QUESTION THAT WAS ASKED, there is no better source than Einstein's writings about the genesis of SR. So, Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar is indeed Tom Robert’s personal God. shrug Einstein had the amazing insight that Maxwell's equations could be divorced from his aether, and still make sense. The insight was already pointed out by Heaviside and Lorentz when they discovered the gamma term popping up all over the place in electromagnetism without even going to SR. Maxwell’s equations were built on the Galilean transform. In fact Maxwell’s equations can be built on any transforms that still make sense. So, your comment is very biased towards SR. It reflects Tom’s deep faith in SR and not of scientific discipline. shrug There are three types of people in the world: 1. Those that cannot learn form their own mistakes Tom Roberts seem to come in mind. shrug 2. Those that can learn from their own mistakes These folks would exclude self-styled physicists including Tom Roberts. shrug 3. Those that can learn from the mistakes of others Koobee Wublee comes in mind. shrug Einstein made a number of mistakes, most of which were quite subtle; he was therefore very fruitful for those of us in group 3. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar made only one mistake in his life. That was the proposal of a negative mass density in vacuum in which self-styled physicists have distorted the Cosmological Constant into vacuum pressure as explained by the following post which has met no challenges despite Tom Robert’s prolific postings to debunk cranks. shrug http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...704956e667e302 To join group 3 in physics you need to STUDY. Tom’s advice is a great one, but Tom fails to follow up on his own advice. For example, it is the link above where Tom failed to understand the field equations that would degenerate into the Poisson equations. Tom Roberts needs to study more about SR and GR instead of preaching through his deep faith in SR and GR. Another example is on these infinite transforms, discovered by Lorentz, that also satisfy the null results of the MMX and all modern experimentations. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History...ransformations All these infinite mathematical models say the Aether must exist while only the Lorentz transform indicates the Aether is elusive. Through Tom’s deep faith in SR, he conveniently reads the scripture to validate SR and invalidate all the other mathematical models that are experimentally indistinguishable from SR given the technology involved. Tom has now acknowledged these mathematical models, saying the Aether must exist, are indeed indistinguishable from SR. In order to salvage his deep faith in SR, he resorts to bull**** as explained in the following link. That is a total insult to anyone’s intelligence. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6f9bf6fff69aae Tom Roberts is a professional experiment physicist. That is of course very unprofessional, misleading/fraudulent, and very stupid. Does anyone accept Tom’s bull**** answer in standing by his faith in SR? Now, Big Dog is betrayed by Tom’s acceptance in these infinite mathematical models that also satisfy the null results of the MMX. Does it accept Tom’s bull**** reply? More like confused and stunned. shrug Sitting in your armchair and pontificating about what you think "ought to be" is useless, and puts you firmly in group 1. Yes, Tom Roberts is a great example in placing himself firmly in group 1. Tom has no problems debunking cranks all these years, but when challenged with real scholarly works, he would shy away. shrug Because the only way to learn about the world we inhabit is by EXPERIMENT, and without study you cannot learn about them. Tom’s last comment is so true. Unfortunately, it is not followed up by self-styled physicists. It is a wake-up call to question why to place these self-styled physicists as leadership role in the study of physics. They are just a bunch of clowns who do not know what they are doing. Very fvcking sad. shrug |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light
"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message ... On Jul 15, 6:49 pm, Tom Roberts wrote: When one asks an HISTORICAL question, then such an HISTORICAL answer is equivalent to "word of God". That is indeed a fvcked comment not related to any intellects. shrug For the QUESTION THAT WAS ASKED, there is no better source than Einstein's writings about the genesis of SR. So, Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar is indeed Tom Robert’s personal God. shrug Einstein had the amazing insight that Maxwell's equations could be divorced from his aether, and still make sense. The insight was already pointed out by Heaviside and Lorentz when they discovered the gamma term popping up all over the place in electromagnetism without even going to SR. Maxwell’s equations were built on the Galilean transform. In fact Maxwell’s equations can be built on any transforms that still make sense. So, your comment is very biased towards SR. It reflects Tom’s deep faith in SR and not of scientific discipline. shrug There are three types of people in the world: 1. Those that cannot learn form their own mistakes Tom Roberts seem to come in mind. shrug ======================================== Tom Roberts AND Kinky Wobbly comes to mind. 2. Those that can learn from their own mistakes These folks would exclude self-styled physicists including Tom Roberts. shrug 3. Those that can learn from the mistakes of others Koobee Wublee comes in mind. shrug ======================================= Not when you are still toting Maxwell's aether and ignoring Newton's emission theory based on Galilean Relativity alone. Kinky Wobbly will never learn from his blunder. scoff ======================================== |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light
Androcles set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time
continuum: The insight was already pointed out by Heaviside and Lorentz when they discovered the gamma term popping up all over the place in electromagnetism without even going to SR. Maxwell’s equations were built on the Galilean transform. Actually Maxwell's equations were already SR-ready while Newton's Laws weren't. What Heaviside and Lorentz noticed was that discrepancy. Only experiment (Michelson-Morley) could determine which one agreed with reality and which one would have to shift. Turned out Maxwell was correct, it was Newton that required the refinements we call SR. -- ξ: ) Proud to be curly Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light
"Curlytop" wrote in message ... Androcles set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time continuum: The insight was already pointed out by Heaviside and Lorentz when they discovered the gamma term popping up all over the place... You've got the wrong Androcles, Cottonmop. Those are not my words, I won't have a gamma out of place. The eccentricity of an ellipse is epsilon = sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2) where v is the minor axis and c the major, though I doubt a ****wit like Lorentz would know it and Einstein used beta, so whatever arse farted gamma didn't know Greek geometry. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light
Curlytop wrote in message
Androcles set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time continuum: He didn't. Koobee Wublee did. Androcles has no idea how to deal with quoting googlegroups postings. All he can do, is draw some horizontal lines and then spout some nonsense. Dirk Vdm The insight was already pointed out by Heaviside and Lorentz when they discovered the gamma term popping up all over the place in electromagnetism without even going to SR. Maxwell’s equations were built on the Galilean transform. Actually Maxwell's equations were already SR-ready while Newton's Laws weren't. What Heaviside and Lorentz noticed was that discrepancy. Only experiment (Michelson-Morley) could determine which one agreed with reality and which one would have to shift. Turned out Maxwell was correct, it was Newton that required the refinements we call SR. -- ξ: ) Proud to be curly Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light
One of the Androcleses set the following eddies spiralling through the
space-time continuum: Androcles set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time continuum: The insight was already pointed out by Heaviside and Lorentz when they discovered the gamma term popping up all over the place... You've got the wrong Androcles, Merely repeating the handle that was attached to the post I was quoting. There is nothing to distinguish one Androcles from another. Cottonmop. I have been subject to ridicule about my hair right from when I was a kid, It doesn't shock or upset me any more. I stand by my pride in my natural hairstyle. -- ξ: ) Proud to be curly Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
THE SPEED OF LIGHT VARIES WITH THE SPEED OF THE OBSERVER | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 9 | March 3rd 12 09:55 AM |
Speed of individual photons cannot exceed speed of light in a vacuum | Yousuf Khan[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 78 | August 11th 11 06:30 PM |
Is speed of sound higher then the speed of light??? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | September 9th 08 12:48 AM |
Why is the Speed of Light the Limiting Speed. | [email protected] | Misc | 20 | September 4th 06 06:34 PM |
parllel universe have diffrent speed of light 128 168 300 299 thats how you find diffrent universe i'm from the planet earth that is the 7th from the sun stuck on one that the planet is 3rd from the sun the speed of light is 128 and 32 dimentions | Roger Wilco | Misc | 1 | December 30th 03 10:15 PM |