|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: Sam Wormley wrote: Tell me, Phil, how do you reconcile the differences between the derivation of the Lorentz Transform and Wiki page you site? Are you not curious? Can you do the derivation yourself? Do you have the foggiest idea of what the Lorentz Transform is? I am really disappointed in you! I don't have time answering at this moment. So Phil admits that he has no clue. But we know that. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote: Well, yes it has. In fact it was done centuries ago. But you would have to look at a textbook to know that. Doug still confuses an empty shell with a solid sphere. Hey stooopid - gaplessly nested thin shells are a solid sphere. Pookie pookie. Folks short of puberty should not pontificate about sex. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: doug wrote: Well, yes it has. In fact it was done centuries ago. But you would have to look at a textbook to know that. Doug still confuses an empty shell with a solid sphere. Well, phil, they both have been worked out for a long time. You really should at least look at a book. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism Disproof
doug wrote:
Well, phil, they both have been worked out for a long time. You really should at least look at a book. My curve fits neatly with the outside the sphere grav. potential. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote: Well, phil, they both have been worked out for a long time. You really should at least look at a book. My curve fits neatly with the outside the sphere grav. potential. Only far field. Even Newton knew better. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism Disproof
On Sep 3, 3:41*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
This is an official thread to confirm Finite Relativism remains undisproven. *Once again the paper can be found at the aforementioned address:http://www.fornux.com/personal/phili...ci_physics.pdf As noticed by Jim Black, section 1.4.1 has a slight error but is irrelevant to the rest of the paper. *This was taken out in other versions. Thank you, -Phil A theory does not earn recognition by virtue of its author being unconvinced that it's wrong. This may be part of your problem. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism Disproof
On Sep 3, 5:52*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote: Phil considers that him posting completely wrong answers and claiming that proves something is somehow doing science. Phil does not know math or science and, if you read the "paper", you can laugh at his pitiful attempt to do the inside the sphere calculation. He gets the answer completely wrong but has no clue why. The rest of his posting is similarly incompetent. Well the goal of this thread is to disprove FR. Why? *But we all noticed you ran out of scientific arguments a long time ago so don't feed on things I already stated. *The measurement unit problem of the inside a sphere is a simple mass density division error I need to correct. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism Disproof
PD wrote:
Why? To cut spaghetti talks and make my point. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism Disproof
PD wrote:
A theory does not earn recognition by virtue of its author being unconvinced that it's wrong. This may be part of your problem. It's unfortunate lies and plagiarism is an easier approach... |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism Disproof
On Sep 3, 10:21*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
PD wrote: Why? To cut spaghetti talks and make my point. If you have a point, you should just get it out and be done with it. If all you really want to do is make your point and not discuss, then do it on a blog and not on a discussion group. If there is something that is confusing ("spaghetti talks"), then have you considered just ASKING, rather than proposing an alternative and asking why your answer isn't right? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Finite Relativism Undisproven | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 2 | August 26th 09 03:02 PM |
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 1366 | May 2nd 09 12:04 AM |
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof | Eric Gisse | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 3rd 09 06:14 AM |
25% OFF -- Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 28th 09 09:54 AM |
Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 4 | January 26th 09 09:00 PM |