|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
FR predicts a light beam from Earth to a similar planet from Andromeda
will take: 2.6e4 years GR anticipates: 2.5e6 years This makes the light beam 9,705.9% faster at that scale. For Alpha Centauri we were talking about a 100.00080373% difference. Detailed information of all variables used in the interstellar and intergalactical contexts are included in the book. A visual representation of the test I gave, which disproves length contraction and therefore Special Relativity, is also included. The title will be available soon at the following location: https://www.createspace.com/3370163 -Phil |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Mar 17, 10:38*am, "Phil Bouchard" wrote:
FR predicts a light beam from Earth to a similar planet from Andromeda will take: 2.6e4 years GR anticipates: 2.5e6 years This makes the light beam 9,705.9% faster at that scale. *For Alpha Centauri we were talking about a 100.00080373% difference. Detailed information of all variables used in the interstellar and intergalactical contexts are included in the book. *A visual representation of the test I gave, which disproves length contraction and therefore Special Relativity, is also included. The title will be available soon at the following location:https://www.createspace.com/3370163 -Phil I have a machine that can produce an infinite amount of free energy. if you send me $39.95, i'll send you a blueprint. kp |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Mar 17, 1:38*am, "Phil Bouchard" wrote:
[snip all, unread] People stopped responding to Phil, so Phil starts a new thread. Go away, Phil. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: FR predicts a light beam from Earth to a similar planet from Andromeda will take: 2.6e4 years GR anticipates: 2.5e6 years This makes the light beam 9,705.9% faster at that scale. For Alpha Centauri we were talking about a 100.00080373% difference. Detailed information of all variables used in the interstellar and intergalactical contexts are included in the book. A visual representation of the test I gave, which disproves length contraction and therefore Special Relativity, is also included. The title will be available soon at the following location: https://www.createspace.com/3370163 -Phil So in your mind, randomly generated numbers from a spreadsheet constitutes a theory? You have proved nothing except that you do not understand relativity. Do you really think you have shown anything? If what you consider disproof of relativity was your silly ball in a box example that was a pathetic attempt even by usenet crank standards. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote:
[snip crap] This makes the light beam 9,705.9% faster at that scale. [snip rest of crap] idiot http://www.edu-observatory.org/physics-faq/Relativity/SR/experiments.html Experimental constraints on Special Relativity Science 323(5919) 1327 (2009) Double pulsar J0737-3039A/B is within 0.05% of GR model http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2006-3/ http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/9148/title/Einstein_Unruffled_Relativity_passes_stringent_new _tests http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039 Experimental constraints on General Relativity -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Mar 17, 5:38*am, "Phil Bouchard" wrote:
FR predicts a light beam from Earth to a similar planet from Andromeda will take: 2.6e4 years GR anticipates: 2.5e6 years This makes the light beam 9,705.9% faster at that scale. *For Alpha Centauri we were talking about a 100.00080373% difference. Detailed information of all variables used in the interstellar and intergalactical contexts are included in the book. *A visual representation of the test I gave, which disproves length contraction and therefore Special Relativity, is also included. The title will be available soon at the following location:https://www.createspace.com/3370163 -Phil Please explain what experiment(s) you performed to falsify SR? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
"doug" wrote in message et... So in your mind, randomly generated numbers from a spreadsheet constitutes a theory? You have proved nothing except that you do not understand relativity. Do you really think you have shown anything? If what you consider disproof of relativity was your silly ball in a box example that was a pathetic attempt even by usenet crank standards. Doug I think you're courageous inviting your own students seeing you live in action on this usenet. I know standards in the education system felt down badly because of the relatively low demand nowadays, but your situation is exceptional. Now you're in a situation you can't get out of because there is no way you can win. You had the worse grade, you failed to defend your arguments and your vagues allegations of "a century of experiments" and you come up with 0 scientific thought, but only hate and jealousy. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Mar 17, 6:24*pm, "Phil Bouchard" wrote:
"doug" wrote in message et... So in your mind, randomly generated numbers from a spreadsheet constitutes a theory? *You have proved nothing except that you do not understand relativity. Do you really think you have shown anything? If what you consider disproof of relativity was your silly ball in a box example that was a pathetic attempt even by usenet crank standards. Doug I think you're courageous inviting your own students seeing you live in action on this usenet. *I know standards in the education system felt down badly because of the relatively low demand nowadays, but your situation is exceptional. *Now you're in a situation you can't get out of because there is no way you can win. *You had the worse grade, you failed to defend your arguments and your vagues allegations of "a century of experiments" and you come up with 0 scientific thought, but only hate and jealousy. Why is a mediocre computer programmer coming here to whine about relativity? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
"doug" wrote in message et... Phil comes in here expecting to be regaled as a hero and instead falls flat on his face by demonstrating he has no idea what relativity says. He tells us he does not like it and he took a freshman physics course so now he is an expert. And, he has a spreadsheet which can give numbers to thirty decimal places. In phil's mind, that makes him the world's greatest physicist. Phil has lost long before he started. Once again Doug, this is no scientific argument. FR tends more to be a law than a theory because its roots are purely mathematical. Lets see, phil, you talked about tossing a ball wherein you demonstrated conclusively you have no clue what relativity says. You made some guesses from your spreadsheet in response to Sam (wrong guesses, by the way) and then you proceed to bluster and look stupid. All of this is to get everyone to pay $39.99 for a book to be written later when phil actually tries to print out his spreasheeet code. According to Doug here is a list of the smartest people of all time, in order of precedence: Einstein (proved singularity, wormhole, length contraction, velocity cap of 3e8 m/s) God (will create infinite amount of universes on the fly accordingly) Stephen Hawkins (confirmed wormholes) Michio Kaku (predicted time travel in the past) Doug (prophet) Eric Gisse (faithful ipod fan) Bill Gates (created crappy windows) I am very happy to look at the last century of experiments and judge them on their merits. It is phil who comes here having a tantrum about how the world should bow down to him. My scientific thought is fine, I am happy for any students to look at the century of experiments and phil's laughable floundering and have them make up their own minds. Nobody agreed paying taxes for your gravitational waves detection device, or even labeling Einstein the miracle as the scientific of the 20th century. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
"doug" wrote in message et... [...] Einstein (proved singularity, wormhole, length contraction, velocity cap of 3e8 m/s) Einstein is a great mind. Ahhahaha! Special Relativity was written by Mileva Maric, and GR spacetime by Minkovsky. He truly came out with the photoelectric effect and its opposite E = mcc but really are plagiarized from ealier theories. Einstein wrote 2 papers at the right time and I give him that but everything else is flawed. In ten years lets see who is still remembered phil, the newly arrived crank or Einstein whose work has withstood a century of careful tests. GR is a mapping of observations and cannot be used outside the galaxy. It also disagrees with quantum mechanics. God (will create infinite amount of universes on the fly accordingly) Sorry, there are lots of gods to choose from so you will have to specify which ones you mean. Yahve, Jehovah or Allah are all the same god from Abraham. [...] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Finite Relativism: Review Request | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 519 | September 25th 12 12:26 AM |
25% OFF -- Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 28th 09 09:54 AM |
Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 4 | January 26th 09 09:00 PM |
GENERAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT SPECIAL RELATIVITY | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 12 | January 1st 09 03:20 PM |
BLAMING SPECIAL RELATIVITY? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 13th 08 01:05 PM |