#611
|
|||
|
|||
mass is light.
"John Griffin" wrote in message
. 1.4 Funny infomercial spewing boy again, arnt we. I bet you or your kind laughed and pointed with a silly ass grin at Christ on that stick, just the way you'd do it again and again if you had the opportunity of sustaining the status quo at all cost. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#612
|
|||
|
|||
mass is light.
Brad Guth wrote: "John Griffin" wrote in message . 1.4 Funny infomercial spewing boy again, arnt we. I bet you or your kind laughed and pointed with a silly ass grin at Christ on that stick, just the way you'd do it again and again if you had the opportunity of sustaining the status quo at all cost. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG On "Coast to Coast" it was mentioned that 'light' or 'photons' are timeless. Not that they last a long time but, rather, that they don't exist in time at all. This is based on Einstein's theory that objects at exactly the speed of light do not age or change. This is yet another peculiarity of 'light'. Certainly strange stuff. It was also brought out that the probability functions relating to the 'uncertainty principle' may be explained by this photonic timelessness. If time doesn't exist for photons then they could be thought of -- or perhaps really do -- exist everywhere at once. Maybe the zillions upon zillions of photons are really just one photon! Our inability to understand existence without time, the 4th dimension, may be the reason for our difficulties combining gravity with the electromagnetic spectrum. Our perspective is that of everything changing. But reality may turn out to be . . . a single photon that is everyplace at once! tomcat |
#613
|
|||
|
|||
mass is light.
"tomcat" wrote in message
oups.com So what? Thus far you're nothing but a waste of good toilet paper. In other words; show me the money. You'll believe in or otherwise suck up to anything that doesn't rock your silly pro-mainstream status quo boat. You really don't give a tinkers damn about science, physics or much less as to our badly failing environment and of its sequestered humanity. Tomcat is still w/o remorse, and apparently w/o an honest soul because, your's has been bought and paid for. Please let us know whenever you decide to actually accomplish something/anything for the greater good of the lower 99.9% worth of humanity, or that of salvaging our environment that yourself and others of your kind have only raped and trashed from the very get go. You and others of your kind are more than smart enough to damn well know of what's right, from what's wrong, yet your course of denial hasn't altered one degree, has it. Is there even a dim light at the end of the "tomcat" tunnel? - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#614
|
|||
|
|||
mass is light.
On 7 Jan 2007 22:34:32 -0800, in a place far, far away, "tomcat"
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: On "Coast to Coast" it was mentioned that 'light' or 'photons' are timeless. Well, if Art Bell says so, it must be right. |
#615
|
|||
|
|||
mass is light.
Rand Simberg wrote: On 7 Jan 2007 22:34:32 -0800, in a place far, far away, "tomcat" made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: On "Coast to Coast" it was mentioned that 'light' or 'photons' are timeless. Well, if Art Bell says so, it must be right. There is more to our World than meets the eye. How can anything be? How can even a drop of water exist? -- Perhaps it doesn't. Perhaps, when everything is taken into account it all equals exactly . .. . zero. It is this 'twist' that might mean a 'single photon' duplicates because of many lesser 'twists'. Somehow nothing becomes everything. And this process of becoming, but never really existing in an absolute sense, is precisely what physics, science, and engineering are all about whether or not physicists, scientists, or engineers realize it or not. The necessary of 'twist' of nothing into everything must involve very strange mechanics. And, with quantum mechanics, we certainly do have very strange mechanics, indeed. Are photons massless? If so then how can they interact with matter? How could a truly massless object impinge itself on our senses. And then, of course, you have that silly little solar engine spinning round and round because photons hit the paddles with . . . force. That 'force' must mean mass. And, YOU, know it. Is everything composed of photons? Well, if light is such a strange phenomena, being timeless and whatnot, then perhaps it is the fundamental building block of our Universe. tomcat |
#616
|
|||
|
|||
mass is light.
In sci.space.policy, on Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:37:31 GMT,
Rand Simberg sez: On 7 Jan 2007 22:34:32 -0800, in a place far, far away, "tomcat" made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: On "Coast to Coast" it was mentioned that 'light' or 'photons' are timeless. Well, if Art Bell says so, it must be right. Curiously enough, in spite of both the immediate and indirect sources here, that statement is correct. There is probably some deep imlication to the fact that cosmic background photons represent a direct instantaneous channel from an instant shortly after the BB to the receiving atom in the present. -- ================================================== ======================== Pete Vincent Disclaimer: all I know I learned from reading Usenet. |
#617
|
|||
|
|||
mass is light.
"tomcat" wrote in message
oups.com There is more to our World than meets the eye. How can anything be? How can even a drop of water exist? -- Perhaps it doesn't. Acording to Usenet's Old Testament physics, nothing is for real, unless it supports their status quo of whatever agenda suits their mainstream ulterior motives, which I believe has something to do with ****ology. Somehow nothing becomes everything. And this process of becoming, but never really existing in an absolute sense, is precisely what physics, science, and engineering are all about whether or not physicists, scientists, or engineers realize it or not. As long as you take to excluding most everything that's Einstein, and stick with utilizing only Usenet's hocus-pocus conditional physics. Physics should work the same on our moon as Venus, yet according to all the wise lords and rusemaster wizards of this Old Testament moderated Usenet from hell, apparently their one and only form of conditional physics is strictly a terrestrial thing (much like their Jewish white god is only a terrestrial god that likes to hord loot and otherwise be in charge of damn near everything that matters). Is everything composed of photons? Well, if light is such a strange phenomena, being timeless and whatnot, then perhaps it is the fundamental building block of our Universe. I think so, as there are perhaps 1e100 complex (quantum string like) photons/atom, with continually more of the same little 2D things on the way, while there's still the every exact same amount of atoms as in the beginning of whatever created our mostly heathen and of now mostly dumbfounded populated universe of pagan fools, telling the rest of us exactly what to believe or not. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#618
|
|||
|
|||
mass is light.
"tomcat" wrote in message
oups.com tomcat, I consider the photon as being roughly as near to a God particle as we're going to get. A photon is pretty much the one and only known item of physics or whatever scientific realm that's safe to coexist along with matter and/or anti-matter, or viable as a safe buffer medium for coexisting between matter and anti-matter. A photon seems nearly if not somewhat AI worthy. A photon is much like the DNA of matter or anti-matter. A photon seems to be the very binder or fabric of spinning atoms. There is a fixed number of atoms, but an unlimited number of photons. A photon can somehow align the few and far between atoms of deep space, and if need be a stream or flow of such wussy 2D (quantum string like) photons can somehow manage to spin up a given 0.0~ K atom, as to accommodating the migration of the photon that seems to command atoms into providing a node by node packet transfer of light speed, or perhaps even capable of a much faster velocity as long as it's not hauling a zeptogram of matter. - Brad guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#619
|
|||
|
|||
mass is light.
"pete" wrote in message
Curiously enough, in spite of both the immediate and indirect sources here, that statement is correct. There is probably some deep imlication to the fact that cosmic background photons represent a direct instantaneous channel from an instant shortly after the BB to the receiving atom in the present. A BB from what? (from nothing?) (from God?) (from another universe?) (from another dimension?) Why not lots of little bangs? (such as from merging cosmic Oort clouds, or even via relatively nearby stellar Oort clouds) How about lots of absolutely horrific bangs from the retro mergings of multiple universes? What about our very own 225 million year galactic clock cycles? (of which we've obviously survived any number of, at least thus far) Why not cosmic cycles, along with a few unavoidable bangs along the way? - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[sci.astro] Galaxies (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (8/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 3rd 06 12:35 PM |
[sci.astro] Stars (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (7/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 3rd 06 12:35 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |