|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Greg D. Moore \(Strider\) wrote: ...A bounty is *not* a bribe, Chris. The difference between a bounty and a bribe is that usually the bribe is under the table. The other difference is a bounty tends to be on something you can only pay once. i.e. the capture of a criminal, etc. A bribe is often "don't do x" so you have to keep paying them to continue keeping them from doing x. Only if you're stupid enough not to realize where that leads. Skillfully applied bribes are paid in return for the doing of specific favors, and any followup is conditional on results. -- "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer -- George Herbert | |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
|
#113
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 03:14:27 -0500, (Mike
Flugennock) wrote: I mean, how could this guy complain about Pl being _removed_ from the Earth? ....Easy. Like any other unwashed treehugging radical commie hippie pervert, all he has to do is to part his beard and open his swear hole, and out comes the drivel. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:38:30 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote: The other difference is a bounty tends to be on something you can only pay once. i.e. the capture of a criminal, etc. A bribe is often "don't do x" so you have to keep paying them to continue keeping them from doing x. ....Something I forgot to also point out is that bribes are usually individual-specific, whereas bounties are usually open to any and all who think they've got the balls and the skills to carry out the task. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Flugennock wrote:
I mean, how could this guy complain about Pl being _removed_ from the Earth? Granted, the amount of Pl aboard Cassini isn't much compared to all the Pl available on Earth, but it's a good start (****, man; launch it _all_, works for me, get it the hell outta here). The Pu (note correct symbol) used in Cassini was manufactured specifically for the purpose of fueling RTGs (or the smaller radioisotope heating units). Making it reduced the amount of neptunium(*) we had sitting around, but didn't consume weapons-related plutonium or Pu in other spent fuel elements. (*) Pu238 is made by purifying Np237, then exposing it to neutrons in a special reactor, transmuting it to Np238 which decays to Pu238. Paul |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
|
#117
|
|||
|
|||
Henry Spencer wrote:
There was a time when it probably wouldn't have taken much to make Ho Chi Minh an ally rather than an enemy, if the idiots in Washington had been able to see beyond that awful C-word and treat it as a practical problem rather than an ideological one. Add in the complication that Ho Chi Minh asked for U.S. assistance when he was preparing to fight against post WWII reoccupation by *France*, a U.S. ally (at the time). Ideally, France wouldn't have screwed the Indochina situation up to begin with by bowing out of Colonial mode gracefully. - Ed Kyle |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Flugennock" wrote in message ... I think his main problem was that a) he hadn't done his homework on how RTGs work and how they're contained (hint: they didn't launch it in one big raw chunk duct-taped to the spaceframe No, that dipship spends way too much time contaminating the University of Florida- he has done his homework, but using real, verifiable data instead of hysterical handwaving doesn't bring in donations or get the publicity necessary for those donations. I've seen him speak, and while I heard the words, I didn't hear the sincerity. |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
Henry Spencer wrote: The SS rank was bestowed on him by Himmler, probably in a bid to gain more influence over the V-2 project. WvB appears to have been embarrassed about it, and reportedly never wore the uniform. But one did not refuse an honor offered by Himmler... -- "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer -- George Herbert | He wore it on one occasion - when Himmler visited Peenemunde. There's a picture in The Rocket and the Reich by MJ Neufeld. -- ================================================= ====================== Michael Morton | Everything is linear if plotted on School of Computer Sciences | log-log with a fat magic marker. University of East Anglia, Norwich | http://www2.cmp.uea.ac.uk/~mtm/work2/ ================================================= ======================= |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
Pat Flannery wrote:
:If they were ever to stop imports to the United States, our economy :would collapse overnight; they have driven so many of our domestic :manufactures out of business that we rely on them completely for all :sorts of goods that we simply don't manufacture in the U.S. anymore, nor :have the ability to quickly restart the manufacture of. Preposterous! There would be some mild inflationary pressures in some segments (but not much - as you mention, we don't compete in those segments) and various minimum wage clerks might get laid off due to lack of merchandise. Just what do you think we're going to suffer a lack of that will cause our economy to "collapse overnight"? Our imports from China are primarily low-priced consumer goods. Chinese imports amount (using American accounting methods) to some $125 billion. Now compare that amount to the overall size of the American and Chinese economies and figure out who gets hurt worse when it stops. Total US IMPORTS amount to some $1.76 trillion. Chinese goods make up less than 10% of our imports. On the other hand, we are their largest export market. Yes, it seems obvious that China imposing an embargo on the US would cause a national economy to implode, all right. It just wouldn't be ours. -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Policy | 145 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Our Moon as BattleStar | Rick Sobie | Astronomy Misc | 93 | February 8th 04 09:31 PM |
First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective | Astronaut | Misc | 0 | January 31st 04 03:11 AM |
New Space Race? | Eugene Kent | Misc | 9 | November 13th 03 01:42 PM |