Last Ditch Test To Try to affirm Dark Matter Particle

nightbat wrote

A lone physicist try's to beat the odds to help prove
dark matter proposed axion particle exists. With HERA ready to call it
quits Piotrzkowski wants to give it one last try.

See:
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn11041

ponder on,
the nightbat

On Jan 29, 4:46 am, nightbat wrote:
nightbat wrote

A lone physicist try's to beat the odds to help prove
dark matter proposed axion particle exists. With HERA ready to call it
quits Piotrzkowski wants to give it one last try.

See:http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn11041

ponder on,
the nightbat


Axions, preons, who knows how they flow!

Double-A

nightbat wrote

Double-A wrote:


On Jan 29, 4:46 am, nightbat wrote:

nightbat wrote

A lone physicist try's to beat the odds to help prove
dark matter proposed axion particle exists. With HERA ready to call it
quits Piotrzkowski wants to give it one last try.

See:http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn11041

ponder on,
the nightbat


Commander Double-A

Axions, preons, who knows how they flow!

Double-A



nightbat

Correct Commander, beyond the Planck quantum realm remains a
mystery but not beyond our theoretical reaches. If the physics tenet
holds true including Officer Oc's for Wolter's profound iterations then
the correct reasoning is that the laws of physics should carry over and
hold even into the utmost sub quantum dimensions as well. The fact that
we cannot presently detect below sub quantum 10-40 energy particles
should not logic against the possibility of dispersed energy/matter
flows as they occur on this macro observable side carrying over as well
into the sub quantum pure invisible theoretical energy field flows.

ponder on,
the nightbat

On Jan 29, 5:47 am, nightbat wrote:
nightbat wrote





Double-A wrote:

On Jan 29, 4:46 am, nightbat wrote:

nightbat wrote

A lone physicist try's to beat the odds to help prove
dark matter proposed axion particle exists. With HERA ready to call it
quits Piotrzkowski wants to give it one last try.

See:http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn11041

ponder on,
the nightbat
Commander Double-A

Axions, preons, who knows how they flow!

Double-A


nightbat

Correct Commander, beyond the Planck quantum realm remains a
mystery but not beyond our theoretical reaches. If the physics tenet
holds true including Officer Oc's for Wolter's profound iterations then
the correct reasoning is that the laws of physics should carry over and
hold even into the utmost sub quantum dimensions as well. The fact that
we cannot presently detect below sub quantum 10-40 energy particles
should not logic against the possibility of dispersed energy/matter
flows as they occur on this macro observable side carrying over as well
into the sub quantum pure invisible theoretical energy field flows.

ponder on,
the nightbat


When you think about the Doppler effect, and look at its equations,
you realize that the length of an EM wave is dependent upon the frame
of the observer. So if you were going sufficiently close to c toward
the source of EM waves, the waves that would have wavelengths greater
than the Planck length in your rest frame would become sub-Planck
length waves in your moving frame.

Double-A

On 2007-01-29 14:39:50 +0000, "Double-A" said:

When you think about the Doppler effect, and look at its equations,
you realize that the length of an EM wave is dependent upon the frame
of the observer. So if you were going sufficiently close to c toward
the source of EM waves, the waves that would have wavelengths greater
than the Planck length in your rest frame would become sub-Planck
length waves in your moving frame.


Another great physics posts from AA!!!!!




--
Saucerheads - denying the blatantly obvious since 2000.

nightbat wrote

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:

On 2007-01-29 14:39:50 +0000, "Double-A" said:

When you think about the Doppler effect, and look at its equations,
you realize that the length of an EM wave is dependent upon the frame
of the observer. So if you were going sufficiently close to c toward
the source of EM waves, the waves that would have wavelengths greater
than the Planck length in your rest frame would become sub-Planck
length waves in your moving frame.

Daffy ducky

Another great physics posts from AA!!!!!

nightbat

Correct quacky, lap it up, from profound Science Officer learn
something'

Coffeeboys - denying reality since day one -- nightbat

On 2007-01-29 14:39:50 +0000, "Double-A" said:

When you think about the Doppler effect, and look at its equations,
you realize that the length of an EM wave is dependent upon the frame
of the observer. So if you were going sufficiently close to c toward
the source of EM waves, the waves that would have wavelengths greater
than the Planck length in your rest frame would become sub-Planck
length waves in your moving frame.

Travelling towards the source it is blueshifted yes, but the rrest of
your post is nonsense.

--
Saucerheads - denying the blatantly obvious since 2000.

In article ,
nightbat wrote:

Correct Commander, beyond the Planck quantum realm remains a
mystery but not beyond our theoretical reaches. If the physics tenet
holds true including Officer Oc's for Wolter's profound iterations then
the correct reasoning is that the laws of physics should carry over and
hold even into the utmost sub quantum dimensions as well. The fact that
we cannot presently detect below sub quantum 10-40 energy particles
should not logic against the possibility of dispersed energy/matter
flows as they occur on this macro observable side carrying over as well
into the sub quantum pure invisible theoretical energy field flows.


QM just is another world for you....


Wolter doesn't exist. The fluid space theory is absolute nonsense, and your
science officers have consistently run away from answering indepth questions on
them.

And in anticipation of your next lame... in real science, people are expected
to stand behind their theories and answer these sort of questions

--
Saucerheads - denying the blatantly obvious since 2000.

nightbat wrote

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:

In article ,
nightbat wrote:


Correct Commander, beyond the Planck quantum realm remains a
mystery but not beyond our theoretical reaches. If the physics tenet
holds true including Officer Oc's for Wolter's profound iterations then
the correct reasoning is that the laws of physics should carry over and
hold even into the utmost sub quantum dimensions as well. The fact that
we cannot presently detect below sub quantum 10-40 energy particles
should not logic against the possibility of dispersed energy/matter
flows as they occur on this macro observable side carrying over as well
into the sub quantum pure invisible theoretical energy field flows.

Daffy Ducky

QM just is another world for you....

nightbat

Clue for you ducky, it's part of the invisible real world.

Daffy Ducky
Wolter doesn't exist. The fluid space theory is absolute nonsense, and your
science officers have consistently run away from answering indepth questions on
them.

nightbat

Ducky in denial affirmed, it's now very net publicly obvious
quacky. Space Fluid Theory is way over your head clueless, give it a
rest. You just can't handle the theoretical presented truth.


Daffy Ducky
And in anticipation of your next lame... in real science, people are expected
to stand behind their theories and answer these sort of questions


nightbat

Your clueless auk coffeeboy gay lames are overdone loony, get a
life. The answers were given and you just bird brain can't listen or get
them. Earth to ducky, it's over quacky, you lost bird brain. Shoo, run
along in your space medium denial, to duckies ignorance is bliss,
geometry is everything.

Coffeeboys - denying reality since day one -- nightbat

It is amazing to me how today's thinkers are trying to construct a Theory of
Everything when the previous theory, the quantum theory, is only half
complete. It just shows how stubborn this current lot of humanity is: to
find the rest of the theory all they have to do is visit my web site. But
they wont, and because they don't they will never be able to construct
anything of any lasting importance. Even funnier, several theorists are
coming to the same conclusion concerning string theory: read "Not Even
Wrong", or "The Trouble With Physics", for some vapid enlightenment, though
even these authors fail to realize the answer lies in my web site. Quantum
theory is the foundation and concrete upon which any new theory must be
built upon, and no one but humble "I" seems to realize how far back you need
to go to find the answers... oh well.

Greysky

www.allocations.cc
Learn how to build a FTL radio.



"nightbat" wrote in message
...
nightbat wrote

A lone physicist try's to beat the odds to help prove dark
matter proposed axion particle exists. With HERA ready to call it quits
Piotrzkowski wants to give it one last try.

See:
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn11041

ponder on,
the nightbat