A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What is wrong with the 'Mainstream Scientific Establishment'?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #521  
Old October 20th 11, 01:57 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
PD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,572
Default What is wrong with the 'Mainstream Scientific Establishment'?

On Oct 19, 10:48*pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc.) wrote:


They are. Their whole religion is based on faith not evidence. There is not
one believable experiment in support of any of Einstein's crap...but they
keep telling each other there are thousands.


They are very believable. The difference perhaps, Ralph, is that this
does not imply that one will be FORCED to believe. You have taken the
option, as has Byron, of simply refusing to believe evidence that is
counter to your preconceived notions. "Nope, won't do it. Can't make
me." You raise this as though it were a taunt that means anything. It
doesn't. One cannot convince a rattan chair of anything, and you can't
convince a pile of salt. Nor would anyone try to convince them, or
you, of anything.
  #522  
Old October 20th 11, 05:13 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
Androcles[_65_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 192
Default What is wrong with the 'Mainstream Scientific Establishment'?


"Jerry" wrote in message
...
On Oct 19, 10:30 pm, "Androcles" .
2011 wrote:
"Jerry" wrote in message


If you look at the MATH,
==================
That would be a good idea, if you look at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img11.gif
and
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img22.gif

you will see but be unable to understand (because you are a stooopid
bigot)
that the proper translation would be "velocity", regardless of the choice
of words of the translator, useless lying illiterate faggot.


If v is velocity (i.e. a vector quantity) in the two equations
to which you provide links, then what is meant by the vector
divisions that are present in both equations? Be precise. What
is the mathematical definition of vector division?

==================================================
Penned and printed text uses bold characters to show the difference
between vectors and scalars.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/VectorSpace.html

I shall use the underscore for vectors.

_1_ is the unit distance vector defining the direction of the x-axis.
x' is clearly a scalar quantity of the unit distance vector pointing
along (defining) the x-axis, x' * _1_.
_y_ is a different vector, as is _z_.

c and v are clearly different scalar quantities of the same unit vector
directed along the x-axis. The unit velocity vector is the unit distance
vector traversed in unit time t.
Thus the term c+v means (c * _1_/1)+(v *_1_/1) = (c+v)* _1_/1.
c+v is the scalar sum of the unit velocity vector along the x-axis.

c-v is simply wrong, it should be v-c. This is because magnitude has no
negative value and the unit vector along the opposing x-axis is denoted
by a minus sign. Scalars are numbers, vectors are directions. Keep them
separate and you won't have a problem. The light changes direction, not
the source and not the mirror.

For any _x_ there exists a _-x_ such that _x_ + _-x_ = _0_ (axiom 4).
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/VectorSpace.html

Time is not a vector, it has no negative direction. "spacetime" is pure
naive sci-fi thought up by H. G. Wells in his novel "The Time Machine",
it is NOT mathematics. "4-vector" is bull****.

The arithmetic of rAB/(c+v) or x'/(c+v) is entirely scalar, the result is
ALWAYS a positive magnitude scalar, there is no "vector division"
except in your deranged mind.
There is no rAB/(c-v), it should be rBA/(v-c). Einstein was sloppy
and no mathematician.

Be specific and learn the difference between magnitude and direction,
then keep them as separate as a bedpan from an IV drip or you will
kill the patient as Einstein killed physics, nurse Jeery. Better yet,
don't meddle in things you know nothing about, a little knowledge
is dangerous.
Jeers and sneers,
Androcles.


  #523  
Old October 20th 11, 05:18 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
Androcles[_65_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 192
Default What is wrong with the 'Mainstream Unscientific Establishment'?


"Jerry" wrote in message
...
On Oct 20, 2:55 am, "Androcles" .
2011 wrote:
"Jerry" wrote in message

...
On Oct 19, 8:09 am, "Androcles" .

2011 wrote:
"Jerry" wrote in message
Why the laughter?


=======================================
Majornutta established that he could not scratch his own arse as
Michelson
had done; he therefore stood up to scratch it first.
Guess what this is, Bozo:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...agnacFixed.gif
If you can't work it out I'll tell you.


How about you tell me:
======================
Ok, I'll tell you.
It's four moving mirrors that Sagnac obtained Newton's rings with
in 1913, 6 years before Majornutta.
The frequencies of the blue-shifted and red-shifted rays are identical
as they originate from the same source, so any phase shift seen as a
result of rotation can only be caused by a change in the path length
of the clockwise ray relative to the counterclockwise ray, OR a
change in the speed of the clockwise ray relative to the counter-
clockwise ray.
This nifty device has since been developed as a navigational tool.

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6618151-0-large.jpg

Sagnac established that he could scratch his own arse without any help
from Majornutta.
Pity you could not work it out for yourself and still can't. You need
to stop listening to big brother Tom, he's a major crank, Ms Jeery.
Bwahahahahaha!


As I expected. Something TOTALLY IRRELEVANT to the discussion,
==================================================
Bwahahahaha!
Sagnac's moving mirror is totally irrelevant to a discussion on
Majornutta's moving mirror! **** off, you stooopid ****.
Jeers and sneers,
Androcles





  #524  
Old October 20th 11, 06:25 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
hanson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,934
Default What is wrong with the 'Mainstream Unscientific Establishment'?

snip

-- [[ Cephalobus 1 : Analdorcle 0 ]] --

"Jerry" wrote:
Something RELEVANT to the discussion

"Analdorcles" Headwort@masterHog...
Jerry, **** off, you stooopid ****. Jeers and sneers,
I, Arse-Parker, have bravely overcome Niemenin's lies.

hanson wrote:
Analdorcle Arse-Parker posted his Folk Physics
again... AHAHAHA... It was not even funny, ....
....which was funny... ... ahahahanson


  #525  
Old October 20th 11, 06:26 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
Androcles[_65_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 192
Default What is wrong with the 'Mainstream Unscientific Establishment'?


"hanson" wrote in message
...
| snip

Mission accomplished.



  #526  
Old October 20th 11, 06:46 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
hanson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,934
Default What is wrong with the 'Mainstream Unscientific Establishment'?

snip

-- [[ Cephalobus 1 : Analdorcle 0 ]] --

"Jerry" wrote:
Something RELEVANT to the discussion

"Analdorcles" Headwort@masterHog... wrote:
Jerry, **** off, you stooopid ****. Jeers and sneers,
I, Arse-Parker, have bravely overcome Niemenin's lies.

hanson wrote:
Analdorcle Arse-Parker posted his Folk Physics
again... AHAHAHA... It was not even funny, ....
....which was funny... ... ahahahanson

"Analdorcles" Headwort@masterHog... wrote:
Mission accomplished.

hanson wrote:
Are you referring to your missionary position you
have bravely accomplished on
http://tinyurl.com/Andro-John-Parkers-Girl-friend who
satisfies http://tinyurl.com/Andros-sad-and-sorry-life

Thanks for the laughs, Parker, the Brave-ly... ahahahahanson



  #527  
Old October 20th 11, 06:46 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
Androcles[_65_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 192
Default What is wrong with the 'Mainstream Unscientific Establishment'?


"hanson" wrote in message
...
| snip

Mission accomplished.




  #528  
Old October 20th 11, 07:01 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
hanson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,934
Default What is wrong with the 'Mainstream Unscientific Establishment'?


snip

-- [[ Cephalobus 1 : Analdorcle 0 ]] --

"Jerry" wrote:
Something RELEVANT to the discussion

"Analdorcles" Headwort@masterHog... wrote:
Jerry, **** off, you stooopid ****. Jeers and sneers,
I, Arse-Parker, have bravely overcome Niemenin's lies.

hanson wrote:
Analdorcle Arse-Parker posted his Folk Physics
again... AHAHAHA... It was not even funny, ....
....which was funny... ... ahahahanson

"Analdorcles" Headwort@masterHog... wrote:
Mission accomplished.

hanson wrote:
Are you referring to your missionary position you
have bravely accomplished on
http://tinyurl.com/Andro-John-Parkers-Girl-friend who
satisfies http://tinyurl.com/Andros-sad-and-sorry-life

Thanks for the laughs, Parker, the Brave-ly... ahahahahanson

"Analdorcles" Headwort@masterHog... wrote:
Mission accomplished.

hanson wrote:
So did refer to your missionary position you have
bravely accomplished on
http://tinyurl.com/Andro-John-Parkers-Girl-friend who
satisfies http://tinyurl.com/Andros-sad-and-sorry-life

Thanks for the laughs, Parker, the Brave-ly... ahahahahanson


  #529  
Old October 20th 11, 07:20 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
Androcles[_65_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 192
Default What is wrong with the 'Mainstream Unscientific Establishment'?


"hanson" wrote in message
...
|
| snip

Keeping me busy snipping for you, cha cha?
Mission accomplished again. Perhaps someone else will snip
for you if they ever read any of your boring childish ****.






  #530  
Old October 20th 11, 08:30 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
hanson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,934
Default What is wrong with the 'Mainstream Unscientific Establishment'?

snip

-- [[ Cephalobus 1 : Analdorcle 0 ]] --

"Jerry" wrote:
Something RELEVANT to the discussion

"Analdorcles" Headwort@masterHog... wrote:
Jerry, **** off, you stooopid ****. Jeers and sneers,
I, Arse-Parker, have bravely overcome Niemenin's lies.

hanson wrote:
Analdorcle Arse-Parker posted his Folk Physics
again... AHAHAHA... It was not even funny, ....
....which was funny... ... ahahahanson

"Analdorcles" Headwort@masterHog... wrote:
Mission accomplished.

hanson wrote:
Are you referring to your missionary position you
have bravely accomplished on
http://tinyurl.com/Andro-John-Parkers-Girl-friend who
satisfies http://tinyurl.com/Andros-sad-and-sorry-life

Thanks for the laughs, Parker, the Brave-ly... ahahahahanson

"Analdorcles" Headwort@masterHog... wrote:
Mission accomplished.

hanson wrote:
So did refer to your missionary position you have
bravely accomplished on
http://tinyurl.com/Andro-John-Parkers-Girl-friend who
satisfies http://tinyurl.com/Andros-sad-and-sorry-life

Thanks for the laughs, Parker, the Brave-ly... ahahahahanson

"Analdorcles" Headwort@masterHog... wrote:
Keeping me busy snipping for you, cha cha?
Perhaps someone else will snip for you if they
ever read any of your boring childish ****.

hanson wrote:
What an ingrate you are... Sheesh! It was you,
John Arse-Parker ||JAP||, who came running
after me whining and begging me:
||JAP|| "What happened?" ="Talk about ME"=

So, for now I will keep on chaperoning you and
follow your posts so that your Folk Physics does
not deteriorate even further down into totally
proletarian levels. .... Don't worry about other
people. They are smart enough to stay away
from me... **** or not .... ahahahaha...
So, watch for my help in your upcoming posts.
You'll be glad I did. ... ahahaha... ahahahanson.


--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to ---
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What the Scientific Establishment DOESN'T want you to knowof theSCIENTIFIC ESTABLISHMENT [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 September 2nd 08 01:54 PM
Vested-Interest Secrets of the SCIENTIFIC ESTABLISHMENT (The Truth ItDoesn't Want You to Know) [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 September 2nd 08 01:47 PM
Corrupt Scientific Establishment Still Blackballing Ed Conrad's Incredible Discoveries -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Ed Conrad Astronomy Misc 0 July 21st 06 11:42 AM
ED CONRAD the PO8 -- Ode to the Scientific Establishment - John Zinni Amateur Astronomy 0 April 27th 06 08:41 PM
ED CONRAD the PO8 -- Ode to the Scientific Establishment.. Ed Conrad Astronomy Misc 1 March 30th 06 06:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.