A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Restoration" of Atlas Silo



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 3rd 08, 06:06 PM posted to sci.space.history
[email protected][_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 214
Default "Restoration" of Atlas Silo

Pretty good stuff here http://www.killerjeanne.com/
...............Doc
  #2  
Old December 4th 08, 02:19 AM posted to sci.space.history
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default "Restoration" of Atlas Silo



wrote:
Pretty good stuff here
http://www.killerjeanne.com/
..............Doc


That looks like a lot of fun to have a gander at...
I'm trying to remember.... was it a Atlas or Titan I that snapped the
cables on the counterweights the first time they tried to raise it
vertically to the surface at fell right back down the silo again?

Pat
  #3  
Old December 4th 08, 06:04 AM posted to sci.space.history
ablo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default "Restoration" of Atlas Silo

Pat Flannery wrote:

That looks like a lot of fun to have a gander at...
I'm trying to remember.... was it a Atlas or Titan I that snapped the
cables on the counterweights the first time they tried to raise it
vertically to the surface at fell right back down the silo again?


It was a Titan I. They raised the missile (which was carrying a full load
of fuel) to the surface, but before they could lower it back down, the
elevator collapsed.
  #4  
Old December 4th 08, 12:20 PM posted to sci.space.history
Jeff Findley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,012
Default "Restoration" of Atlas Silo


"ablo" wrote in message
...
Pat Flannery wrote:

That looks like a lot of fun to have a gander at...
I'm trying to remember.... was it a Atlas or Titan I that snapped the
cables on the counterweights the first time they tried to raise it
vertically to the surface at fell right back down the silo again?


It was a Titan I. They raised the missile (which was carrying a full load
of fuel) to the surface, but before they could lower it back down, the
elevator collapsed.


Which leads to, "maybe it's better to design a silo where the missile can
launch from underground, instead of using an elevator to lift tons of rocket
fuel and nuclear warheads". :-)

Jeff
--
beb - To paraphrase Stephen Colbert, reality has an anti-Ares I bias.



  #5  
Old December 4th 08, 12:20 PM posted to sci.space.history
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default "Restoration" of Atlas Silo



ablo wrote:


That looks like a lot of fun to have a gander at...
I'm trying to remember.... was it a Atlas or Titan I that snapped the
cables on the counterweights the first time they tried to raise it
vertically to the surface at fell right back down the silo again?


It was a Titan I. They raised the missile (which was carrying a full load
of fuel) to the surface, but before they could lower it back down, the
elevator collapsed.



Did the LOX and Kerosene go "boom" at that point?
I once saw some really funny video of a attempted liftoff of a Titan II
out of a "hot launch" silo.
The camera is looking at the top of the silo, and you slowly see this
warhead rise into view over the edge of the silo...then it just sits
there for a second or so...and begins to slowly descend back into the
silo...then all hell breaks loose. I assume the turbopumps on the first
stage malfunctioned shortly after ignition.

Pat
  #6  
Old December 4th 08, 08:22 PM posted to sci.space.history
ablo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default "Restoration" of Atlas Silo

Pat Flannery wroteL

Did the LOX and Kerosene go "boom" at that point?


Sure did.

I once saw some really funny video of a attempted liftoff of a Titan
II out of a "hot launch" silo.
The camera is looking at the top of the silo, and you slowly see this
warhead rise into view over the edge of the silo...then it just sits
there for a second or so...and begins to slowly descend back into the
silo...then all hell breaks loose. I assume the turbopumps on the
first stage malfunctioned shortly after ignition.


A lot of things can cause thrust decay or engine shutdown. I never saw
the video you mentioned, but I did see one of a disastrous Titan II silo
launch. Upon liftoff some wiring was ripped out of the base of the
missile, cutting off the power supply. The Titan thus had no functioning
guidance system and immediately started spinning around erratically. The
range safety officer couldn't destroy it because of the power loss.

Everyone was in a panic because the Titan could reach a populated area
in a matter of minutes and crash, spraying toxic propellants everywhere.
But it never got that far. After about 30 or so seconds of flight, it
pitched over and broke apart from structural stress. Date of the
incident was February 1963.
  #7  
Old December 4th 08, 09:54 PM posted to sci.space.history
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default "Restoration" of Atlas Silo



ablo wrote:
A lot of things can cause thrust decay or engine shutdown. I never saw
the video you mentioned, but I did see one of a disastrous Titan II silo
launch. Upon liftoff some wiring was ripped out of the base of the
missile, cutting off the power supply. The Titan thus had no functioning
guidance system and immediately started spinning around erratically. The
range safety officer couldn't destroy it because of the power loss.

Everyone was in a panic because the Titan could reach a populated area
in a matter of minutes and crash, spraying toxic propellants everywhere.
But it never got that far. After about 30 or so seconds of flight, it
pitched over and broke apart from structural stress. Date of the
incident was February 1963.


The one I mentioned appeared on "Rowen & Martin's Laugh-In" when the
Pentagon (or was it the Air Force?) was awarded "The Flying Fickle
Finger Of Fate" prize... the same collection of clips had a really wild
one of a Bomarc lifting off, getting around 2,000 feet up, and then
start spinning around in very tight loops... amazingly, it manages to
stay airborne for 15-20 seconds before slamming back into the ground. It
almost looks like one of the ramjets lit, and the other one didn't, but
it didn't look like it was going fast enough for the ramjets to generate
much thrust, so it was probably something going off-kilter with the
rocket engine.

Pat
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
might Odissey-Moon be the Google's expected, preferred, designed,"chosen" and (maybe) "funded" GLXP team to WIN the prize? with ALL otherteams that just play the "sparring partners" role? gaetanomarano Policy 3 September 27th 08 06:47 PM
just THREE YEARS AFTER my "CREWLESS Space Shuttle" article, theNSF """experts""" discover the idea of an unmanned Shuttle to fill the2010-2016 cargo-to-ISS (six+ years) GAP gaetanomarano Policy 3 September 15th 08 04:47 PM
and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF "slow motion experts" have(finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... just 20 gaetanomarano Policy 9 August 30th 08 12:05 AM
15 answers to nonsense being spread by "creation science,""intelligent design," and "Expelled" Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names[_1_] Amateur Astronomy 1 April 29th 08 01:29 PM
"Constant failure"; "The greatest equations ever"; "The Coming Revolutions in Particle Physics" fishfry Astronomy Misc 0 February 13th 08 02:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.