|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH
On Oct 27, 4:59*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Oct 16, 10:44*am, "Rocky" wrote: Reality is gravity waves have yet to be found.. I think its time to say that gravity has a field but no waves. *TreBert * ---------- *Reply below *---------- There could be a 1000 sub atomic particles that we do not even know about yet. *So gravity could still be something spinning in a corkscrew manner. Gravity makes no waves. *TreBert Don't be so absolute certain about that. If gravity isn't moving relative to Earth, then there's not a wave to behold. A WD of 2e30 kg passing through our solar system at 30 km/sec relative to us, and if missing us by 0.1 AU (14.9e6 km), would likely tare our mostly fluid planet to shreds, although our mostly fused solid moon could survive at least until it ran into big chunks of Earth. Even a 0.5 AU near miss would be extremely problematic, if not lethal to most life on Earth as it blew and sucked a good portion of our atmosphere away, and to think 1(+/- .5) Ms WDs can't be all that uncommon if only 3% of the nearly 1e12 stars (including RDs) are available as WDs. That’s 3e10 WDs and perhaps another 3e9 NSs to consider as solar system worthy killers, not to mention what the closing Andromeda galaxy will toss at us with a 300 km/s differential. The gravity wave from the next Sirius encounter could get real interesting, especially as our Oort cloud interacts with the Sirius Oort cloud, plus any wandering planets that Sirius(B) as having lost its tidal radii grip could be worth paying attention to. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH
On Oct 13, 2:47*pm, "Rocky" wrote:
Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH *http://youtu.be/96cB-HUpAXU Uploaded by J7409 on Oct 13, 2011 Gravity is the overall big-picture problem for us. Though locally there's not so much gravity to fear as actual shards of paramagnetic basalt from our moon, plus whatever from the arriving asteroid that’ll be attracted by the combined gravity of Earth and our moon. Unfortunately, Earth will eventually get 2/3 of it. This asteroid (2005 YU55) is arriving too damn fast to get captured, but it’s certainly capable of demonstrating a method of capture should it have a glancing lithobraking encounter with our moon. Perhaps our crack FEMA and NOAA are simply getting themselves prepared for a seriously nasty big one (somewhat like our DoD and Pentagon were off playing war games based upon a large commercial aircraft smacking into tall buildings on the exact same day as such was actually happening). Does anyone here believe in Karma? This one is serious Warhol doom and gloom, and especially doom worthy if this bad-boy trajectory should drift by any micro-fraction of a degree and whack into our moon. http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/comet...et20110502.gif http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/...asteroid-flyby http://www.universetoday.com/85360/t...h-in-november/ Perhaps this November 9th asteroid (2005 YU55) as a 400 meter diameter worth of unknown mass (being that it’s so spherical could suggest a rather solid item of mostly nickel iron), passing through at 38 km/sec with its NEO distance of 324,600 km could conceivably manage to hit our moon at 13 km/sec. Too bad the regular JPL asteroid NEO simulator can’t muster up any specifics on how close it’ll get to our physically dark and naked moon. It looks as though it’ll miss the moon by roughly a little more than 0.5 LD as depicted in this following link. http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/comet...et20110502.gif No doubt we’ll see a little fine tuning with their graphic simulation as it gets closer. A moon impact would not give us much time if some of the secondary shards are coming our way at 10+ km/sec, and of course there’s even a slight chance of a glancing blow whereas this item mostly survives its lithobraking encounter and subsequently becomes slowed down but otherwise more attracted to the Earth+moon gravity well. As far as anyone knows, this one has never gotten so close, so it’ll be interesting to see how much revising of its NEO simulation takes place, which should also tell us its mass. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH
On Oct 13, 2:47*pm, "Rocky" wrote:
Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH *http://youtu.be/96cB-HUpAXU Uploaded by J7409 on Oct 13, 2011 Gravity is the overall big-picture problem for us, because as is more people seem to die because of encountering or having to deal with gravity than anything else (Pandora has the right amount of gravity, as in hardly any). Though locally there's not so much gravity to fear as there could be actual shards of paramagnetic basalt from our moon, plus whatever parts from the arriving asteroid that’ll be attracted by the combined gravity of Earth and our moon. Unfortunately, Earth will eventually get 2/3 of it (again due to gravity, just like all them dinosaurs had to pay the ultimate price due to gravity and that item or several which impacted Earth). This asteroid (2005 YU55) is arriving too damn fast to get captured, but it’s certainly capable of demonstrating a method of capture should it have a glancing lithobraking encounter with our moon. Perhaps our crack FEMA and NOAA are simply getting themselves prepared for a seriously nasty big one (somewhat like our DoD and Pentagon were off playing war games based upon a large commercial aircraft smacking into tall buildings on the exact same day as such was actually happening). Does anyone here believe in Karma? This one is serious Warhol doom and gloom, and especially doom worthy if this bad-boy trajectory should drift by any micro-fraction of a degree and whack into our moon. http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/comet...et20110502.gif http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/...asteroid-flyby http://www.universetoday.com/85360/t...h-in-november/ Perhaps this November 9th asteroid (2005 YU55) as a 400 meter diameter worth of unknown mass (being that it’s so spherical could suggest a rather solid item of mostly nickel iron), passing through at 38 km/sec with its NEO distance of 324,600 km could conceivably manage to hit our moon at 13 km/sec. Too bad the regular JPL asteroid NEO simulator can’t muster up any specifics on how close it’ll get to our physically dark and naked moon. It looks as though it’ll miss the moon by roughly a little more than 0.5 LD as depicted in this following link. http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/comet...et20110502.gif No doubt we’ll see a little fine tuning with their graphic simulation as it gets closer. A moon impact would not give us much time if some of the secondary shards are coming our way at 10+ km/sec, and of course there’s even a slight chance of a glancing blow whereas this item mostly survives its lithobraking encounter and subsequently becomes slowed down but otherwise more attracted to the Earth+moon gravity well. As far as anyone knows, this one has never gotten so close, so it’ll be interesting to see how much revising of its NEO simulation takes place, which should also tell us its mass. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH
YOU'D BETTER MOVE TO VENUS, GOOFY!
THE BORG ARE WAITING FOR YOU THERE! ****ING IDIOT! Saul Levy On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:03:26 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth wrote: Don't be so absolute certain about that. If gravity isn't moving relative to Earth, then there's not a wave to behold. A WD of 2e30 kg passing through our solar system at 30 km/sec relative to us, and if missing us by 0.1 AU, would likely tare our planet to shreds. Even a 0.5 AU near miss would be extremely problematic, if not lethal to most life on Earth as it blew and sucked a good portion of our atmosphere away, and to think 1 Ms WDs can't be all that uncommon. Brad Guth, I AM INSANE! |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH
LITHOBRAKE YOUR ASS TO VENUS, GOOF!
Saul Levy On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:53:12 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth wrote: Gravity is the overall big-picture problem for us. Though locally there's not so much gravity to fear as actual shards of paramagnetic basalt from our moon, plus whatever from the arriving asteroid that’ll be attracted by the combined gravity of Earth and our moon. Unfortunately, Earth will eventually get 2/3 of it. This asteroid (2005 YU55) is arriving too damn fast to get captured, but it’s certainly capable of demonstrating a method of capture should it have a glancing lithobraking encounter with our moon. Brad Guth, MORE STUPIDITY FROM GOOFY! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gravity wave Detectors ??? | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 2 | August 3rd 07 02:41 AM |
Did anyone ever ask how gravity lengthens or shortens a wave? | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 6 | April 24th 07 07:39 AM |
Oh not again ..to-day "The Times" Earth’s gravity may lure deadly asteroid | Peter van Grijfland | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | April 20th 05 05:41 PM |
What's up with gravity wave detection? | dkomo | Astronomy Misc | 153 | September 14th 04 08:15 PM |
Oceanographers Catch First Wave Of Gravity Mission's Success | Ron Baalke | Science | 13 | August 7th 03 06:24 AM |