If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. 


Thread Tools  Display Modes 
#1




Einstein's 1918 Homogeneous Gravitational Field
In some cases one can find a reasonable explanation of both why Einstein produced an obvious idiocy and why the gullible world accepted it. Einstein's 1918 idiocy, however, is absolutely mysterious  there can be no explanation at all:
In 1918 Einstein informed the gullible world that, as the traveling clock (twin) turns around and experiences acceleration, a HOMOGENEOUS GRAVITATIONAL FIELD emerges. This homogeneous gravitational field somehow affects the distant stayathome clock and makes it run very fast (which means that the stayathome twin suddenly gets very old) during the turningaround period: Albert Einstein 1918: "A homogeneous gravitational field appears, that is directed towards the positive xaxis. Clock U1 is accelerated in the direction of the positive xaxis until it has reached the velocity v, then the gravitational field disappears again. An external force, acting upon U2 in the negative direction of the xaxis prevents U2 from being set in motion by the gravitational field. [...] According to the general theory of relativity, a clock will go faster the higher the gravitational potential of the location where it is located, and during partial process 3 U2 happens to be located at a higher gravitational potential than U1. The calculation shows that this speeding ahead constitutes exactly twice as much as the lagging behind during the partial processes 2 and 4." http://sciliterature.50webs.com/Dialog.htm David Morin, Introduction to Classical Mechanics With Problems and Solutions, Chapter 11, p. 14: "Twin A stays on the earth, while twin B flies quickly to a distant star and back. [...] For the entire outward and return parts of the trip, B does observe A's clock running slow, but ENOUGH STRANGENESS occurs during the turningaround period to make A end up older." http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/chap11.pdf "When the twin in the spaceship turns around to make his journey home, the shift in his frame of reference causes his perception of his brother's age to change rapidly: he sees his brother getting suddenly older. This means that when the twins are finally reunited, the stayathome twin is the older of the two." http://topquark.hubpages.com/hub/TwinParadox Einstein's 1918 idiocy was a crucial fudge factor that saved the "theory". Without recourse to ENOUGH STRANGENESS, Einstein's relativity predicts that either twin will find his brother younger when they reunite after the trip.. Einsteinians do teach Einstein's 1918 idiocy but never mention the "homogeneous gravitational field"  it is too idiotic, even by the standards of Einstein cult: Richard Feynman: "So the way to state the rule is to say that the man who has felt the accelerations, who has seen things fall against the walls, and so on, is the one who would be the younger." http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_16.html John Norton: "Moments after the turnaround, when the travelers clock reads just after 2 days, the traveler will judge the stayathome twin's clock to read just after 7 days. That is, the traveler will judge the stayathome twin's clock to have jumped suddenly from reading 1 day to reading 7 days. This huge jump puts the stayathome twin's clock so far ahead of the traveler's that it is now possible for the stayathome twin's clock to be ahead of the travelers when they reunite." http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teachi...yon/index.html Physics Girl (4:30): "One last question. What's happening to the clocks during the period of acceleration? We still get time dilation, but we have to use a different set of rules from the general relativity. General relativity states that clocks runs slower in accelerated reference frames. So while your twin is turning around, her clock runs slower, and she sees the same thing. She sees your clock running faster than hers, so you're aging quicker.. It's during this period of acceleration that you become the older twin." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERgwVm9qWKA Einstein's idiocies killed physics but resurrection is possible (if it's not too late). See a suggestion for an Einsteinfree physics he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev 
Ads 
#2




Einstein's 1918 Homogeneous Gravitational Field
This euphemistic version of Einstein's 1918 idiocy is easy to explain:
David Morin, Introduction to Classical Mechanics, Chapter 11, p. 14: "Twin A stays on the earth, while twin B flies quickly to a distant star and back.. [...] For the entire outward and return parts of the trip, B does observe A's clock running slow, but ENOUGH STRANGENESS occurs during the turningaround period to make A end up older." http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/chap11.pdf Special relativity predicts that either twin sees his brother aging more slowly, and the looming reductio ad absurdum can only be stopped by enough strangeness. Simple. The brainwashed world would never ask for more explanation. What is totally mysterious and inexplicable is Einstein's HOMOGENEOUS GRAVITATIONAL FIELD  where Einstein found the courage to introduce the incomparable idiocy and why nobody has questioned it for more than a century: Albert Einstein 1918: "A homogeneous gravitational field appears, that is directed towards the positive xaxis." http://sciliterature.50webs.com/Dialog.htm https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DafYwspX0AAixYo.jpg Pentcho Valev 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Light Falls in Gravitational Field and Disproves Einstein  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  1  April 30th 18 10:52 AM 
Einstein's 1918 Blatant Lie  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  2  January 18th 17 12:33 AM 
EINSTEIN 1918 CONTRADICTS EINSTEIN 1905  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  2  July 27th 14 09:45 PM 
LIGHT IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD : NO PLACE FOR EINSTEIN  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  3  June 11th 14 09:52 PM 
gravitationalwave sources (was: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?)  brian a m stuckless  Policy  0  February 2nd 06 07:12 PM 