![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:
PRE Style='White-Space: PRE !important; Font-Size: 18px !important;Font-Family: monospace !important;' Humanity has spiked atmospheric carbon dioxide; see: http://www.southwestclimatechange.or...re_records.jpg Last 20 thousand years, as atmospheric carbon dioxide has risen, the earth has warmed and Sea Levels rose 130 meters; see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_le..._geologic_time http://www.southwestclimatechange.or...l/past-present "eXergy" is energy that can do work. As eXergy is consumed, entropy rachets up. The battle for the (limited) exergy prize is between: · The carbon dioxide breathers ( Algae and Plants ). · The oxygen breathers ( Fungi and Animals ). Algae and Plants are siblings. Fungi and Animals are siblings of a different parent. Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide won't stop rising unless·and·until Algae and Plants beat·back Fungi and Animals. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon...on centration Then you have to ask why the outer planets are also heating up. I still see it as a long term cycle. I highly doubt we have the technology to clear up any planet wide problems. And that we can't even clean up the mess at Fukishima, which is dumping tons of radioactive substances into the ocean every day. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jeff-Relf.Me" wrote in message
}... Society, the world around, thinks it's everyone's God·given right to breed as often as you want, no matter what. When resources get low, it's time for a nice war. As if bombs ever solved the problem. We wouldn't treat our pets this badly; we spay and neuter them. http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Einstein.HTM http://Jeff-Relf.Me/The_Cosmic_Horizon_.HTM *** We could, for a start, neuter all non contributing and parasitic deadbeats, preferably without anesthetic and with the aid of a rusty knife blade ... this step would greatly reduce CO2 emissions and Oxygen consumption by the proletariat. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PRE Style='White-Space: PRE !important; Font-Size: 18px !important;Font-Family: monospace !important;'Â*
Humanity has spiked atmospheric carbon dioxide; see: http://www.southwestclimatechange.or...re_records.jpg Last 20 thousand years, as atmospheric carbon dioxide has risen, the earth has warmed and Sea Levels rose 130 meters; see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_le..._geologic_time http://www.southwestclimatechange.or...l/past-present "eXergy" is energy that can do work. As eXergy is consumed, entropy rachets up. The battle for the (limited) exergy prize is between: · The carbon dioxide breathers ( Algae and Plants ). · The oxygen breathers ( Fungi and Animals ). Algae and Plants are siblings. Fungi and Animals are siblings of a different parent. Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide won't stop rising unless·and·until Algae and Plants beat·back Fungi and Animals. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon...on centration |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Society, the world around,
thinks it's everyone's God·given right to breed as often as you want, no matter what. When resources get low, it's time for a nice war. As if bombs ever solved the problem. We wouldn't treat our pets this badly; we spay and neuter them. http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Einstein.HTM http://Jeff-Relf.Me/The_Cosmic_Horizon_.HTM |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/24/2014 06:00 PM, Snit wrote:
It is a lot more complex than this, but the basic idea is that long ago many plants grew and absorbed massive amounts of carbon. That carbon has been, mostly, contained in their remains ever since (though there was one massive, natural release of it long ago - which lead to one of the great extinctions). Now humans are releasing this carbon back into the atmosphere and into the oceans at a rate unseen since the evolution of man. This is likely to lead not just to warming but to another great extinction... and will destroy our coastal cities and alter much of the climate and ecology of the planet. Some stick their head in the sand... but at this point there is so much good info on this that without a reasoned counter, for which there is currently none, to deny it is simply to chose to be ignorant. We see that in several folks in COLA: willful ignorance. It is a shame. The head in the sand is the amazing fantasy you just spun. CO2 is not a major Greenhouse gas. There is ZERO evidence that it caused any extinction. All of this is simply fiction and speculation. You are the shame here which allows total science fiction to be presented as "science" for the financial gain of the few. SHAME ON YOU! In the mean time we can all prepare to run from that 2 millimeter a year sea rise that is going to destroy all civilization! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hägar wrote: "Jeff-Relf.Me" wrote in message }... Society, the world around, thinks it's everyone's God·given right to breed as often as you want, no matter what. When resources get low, it's time for a nice war. As if bombs ever solved the problem. We wouldn't treat our pets this badly; we spay and neuter them. http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Einstein.HTM http://Jeff-Relf.Me/The_Cosmic_Horizon_.HTM *** We could, for a start, neuter all non contributing and parasitic deadbeats, preferably without anesthetic and with the aid of a rusty knife blade ... this step would greatly reduce CO2 emissions and Oxygen consumption by the proletariat. I know a Veterinarian's office that would fix you for only $100,....maybe less, if I showed then a few of your posts. They probably then, would even do it for free, as a public service. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:27:20 -0400, "Bast"
posted ): Hägar wrote: "Jeff-Relf.Me" wrote in message }... Society, the world around, thinks it's everyone's God·given right to breed as often as you want, no matter what. When resources get low, it's time for a nice war. As if bombs ever solved the problem. We wouldn't treat our pets this badly; we spay and neuter them. http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Einstein.HTM http://Jeff-Relf.Me/The_Cosmic_Horizon_.HTM *** We could, for a start, neuter all non contributing and parasitic deadbeats, preferably without anesthetic and with the aid of a rusty knife blade ... this step would greatly reduce CO2 emissions and Oxygen consumption by the proletariat. I know a Veterinarian's office that would fix you for only $100,....maybe less, if I showed then a few of your posts. They probably then, would even do it for free, as a public service. ROFL, awesome response. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia & Ubuntu Supporter www.silverlips.ca |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Silver Slimer" wrote in message ...
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:27:20 -0400, "Bast" posted ): Hägar wrote: "Jeff-Relf.Me" wrote in message }... Society, the world around, thinks it's everyone's God·given right to breed as often as you want, no matter what. When resources get low, it's time for a nice war. As if bombs ever solved the problem. We wouldn't treat our pets this badly; we spay and neuter them. http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Einstein.HTM http://Jeff-Relf.Me/The_Cosmic_Horizon_.HTM *** We could, for a start, neuter all non contributing and parasitic deadbeats, preferably without anesthetic and with the aid of a rusty knife blade ... this step would greatly reduce CO2 emissions and Oxygen consumption by the proletariat. I know a Veterinarian's office that would fix you for only $100,....maybe less, if I showed then a few of your posts. They probably then, would even do it for free, as a public service. ROFL, awesome response. -- Silver Slimer OpenMedia & Ubuntu Supporter www.silverlips.ca *** You're right, Slimey ... she/it does have some lucid moments ... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We usually can not clean up after ourselves without making the situation even worse. However, as the Sirius Oort cloud gets closer, things should really start heating up (especially when Earth gets nailed by significant items).
However, if anything our sun has been cooling back down, and therefore the only objective variable with having anything significant to offer, is that which is derived from us humans and of course that which is caused by our physically dark and paramagnetic moon which isn't exactly cooling us off. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...es-plunge.html 2013 was due to be year of the 'solar maximum' Researchers say solar activity is at a fraction of what they expect Conditions 'very similar' a time in 1645 when a mini ice age hit How much raw energy per hour do you think we humans contribute? How much all-inclusive raw carbon have all humans released thus far? How many trillion tonnes of hydrocarbons have we consumed? How many hundred billion tonnes of raw and processed methanes and helium have we released over the past 2000 years? How long does the artificially released hydrocarbon forms of methane stay with Earth? Where exactly does the helium that doesn't bind with anything actually go, once it's released? On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 1:06:57 PM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: * Humanity has spiked atmospheric carbon dioxide; see: http://www.southwestclimatechange.or...re_records.jpg Last 20 thousand years, as atmospheric carbon dioxide has risen, the earth has warmed and Sea Levels rose 130 meters; see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_le..._geologic_time http://www.southwestclimatechange.or...l/past-present "eXergy" is energy that can do work. As eXergy is consumed, entropy rachets up. The battle for the (limited) exergy prize is between: · The carbon dioxide breathers ( Algae and Plants ). · The oxygen breathers ( Fungi and Animals ). Algae and Plants are siblings. Fungi and Animals are siblings of a different parent. Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide won't stop rising unless·and·until Algae and Plants beat·back Fungi and Animals. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon...on centration |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 6:28:07 PM UTC-7, benj wrote:
On 06/24/2014 06:00 PM, Snit wrote: It is a lot more complex than this, but the basic idea is that long ago many plants grew and absorbed massive amounts of carbon. That carbon has been, mostly, contained in their remains ever since (though there was one massive, natural release of it long ago - which lead to one of the great extinctions). Now humans are releasing this carbon back into the atmosphere and into the oceans at a rate unseen since the evolution of man. This is likely to lead not just to warming but to another great extinction... and will destroy our coastal cities and alter much of the climate and ecology of the planet. Some stick their head in the sand... but at this point there is so much good info on this that without a reasoned counter, for which there is currently none, to deny it is simply to chose to be ignorant. We see that in several folks in COLA: willful ignorance. It is a shame. The head in the sand is the amazing fantasy you just spun. CO2 is not a major Greenhouse gas. There is ZERO evidence that it caused any extinction. All of this is simply fiction and speculation. You are the shame here which allows total science fiction to be presented as "science" for the financial gain of the few. SHAME ON YOU! In the mean time we can all prepare to run from that 2 millimeter a year sea rise that is going to destroy all civilization! Add a few too many tidal storm surges to that 2 mm/year rise, and it's not going to be very nice. Perhaps by the end of this century we'll get to see a 25 mm/year rise in ocean levels. Still those oligarchs, Bilderbergs and Rothschilds will not have to fret, because their properties are situated much higher and they'll own most of Greenland by then. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carbon Dioxide is bad for more than Global Warming | Quadibloc | Amateur Astronomy | 14 | April 10th 10 02:04 PM |
Carbon Dioxide Emissions Three Times Higher Than Expected | kT | Policy | 44 | June 8th 07 03:06 AM |
Carbon Dioxide - 381 ppm - 3.0 ppm/y | Thomas Lee Elifritz | Policy | 236 | April 1st 06 06:01 AM |
Paper - Ozone Abundance in a Nitrogen-Carbon Dioxide... | Jason H. | SETI | 3 | January 29th 05 04:07 AM |
What to do with Carbon Dioxide? | hanson | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 10th 03 01:01 AM |