Chapt9 Proof that Doppler shift is nonexistent in light-waves #41Atom Totality theory 5th ed.

Chapter 8: Experiment that shows us what the redshift truly is--
refraction caused by curvature of the lobes of an Atom Totality.

CHAPT 9 proof that Doppler shift is nonexistent in light waves

Subject: Two-Experimentum-crucis that EM has no Doppler shift
possible.

I am going to have fun with this chapter. As mentioned before, in this
edition it is chapter 9
following chapter 8 on the fiberglass experiment, but in the next
edition, 6th edition, this
chapter must precede 8 because why hack and hash around the Doppler
shift when it is
easy to prove it just does not exist for light waves or any EM
spectrum.

So this chapter is about a proof that Doppler shift occurs in sound
waves but never in
EM spectrum.

--- quoting Wikipedia on Doppler ---
In this work, Doppler postulated his principle (later coined the
Doppler effect) that the observed frequency of a wave depends on the
relative speed of the source and the observer, and he tried to use
this concept for explaining the colour of binary stars. The Doppler
effect of sound was verified by Buys Ballot in 1845.

--- end quoting ---


Experimentum Crucis means "deciding experiment" or "crucial
experiment". In the case
of proving light has no Doppler shift possible is based on Special
Relativity experiment done by Michelson in 1887 for if light waves can
be Doppler shifted it would be detected
by Michelson's interferometer.

--- quoting the Michelson experiment of 1887 from Wikipedia
Michelson had a solution to the problem of how to construct a device
sufficiently accurate to detect aether flow. The device he designed,
later known as an interferometer, sent a single source of white light
through a half-silvered mirror that was used to split it into two
beams travelling at right angles to one another. After leaving the
splitter, the beams travelled out to the ends of long arms where they
were reflected back into the middle on small mirrors. They then
recombined on the far side of the splitter in an eyepiece, producing a
pattern of constructive and destructive interference based on the
spent time to transit the arms.
--- end quoting about Michelson experiment ---

The whole entire point of the theory of Special Relativity is that the
speed of light is never
adjusted by the motion of the source or observer, and that means
frequency and wavelength are invariant to the motion of both observer
and source.

Apparently the entire physics and astronomy community from 1900 to
2010 never realized that Doppler shift is impossible with Special
Relativity. It shows us how rare it is to have a
"logical mind" in the sciences. My father used to chide me by saying
"in one ear, out the other". But we should chide the entire physics
and astronomy community for having understood the Doppler effect for
sound waves like a train whistle, but how ignorant was the physics and
astronomy community by taking light waves as Doppler affected and
never really proving the claim. Never really asking "Is the Doppler
effect compatible with
Special Relativity or contradictory"? Remarkable that no-one in
physics or astronomy ever
really tested the question-- "Does the Doppler effect hold for EM
since there is Special Relativity"?

The Michelson Experiment says the Doppler effect is not possible with
Special Relativity.

And the second deciding-experiment is the recent Harvard's
Hua work on "slowed light" for the light going in is white and the
light coming out is white.

http://www.seas.harvard.edu/haulab/
Physical Review Letters cover shows white light going in the
experiment and white light coming out as "slowed light".
Look at that cover of Physical Review Letters and you see the same
white light.

In other words, these experiments of slowed light is a Experimentum-
crucis that light cannot be Doppler shifted.

There is a third practical experiment of just observing lightning bolt
flashes that they are always "white light" never redshifted nor
blueshifted.

And now that the word is out, we can expect many other experiments
showing that EM
cannot have a Doppler effect.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

--- quoting ---
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppler_effect
The use of the Doppler effect for light in astronomy depends on our
knowledge that the spectra of stars are not continuous. They exhibit
absorption lines at well defined frequencies that are correlated with
the energies required to excite electrons in various elements from one
level to another. The Doppler effect is recognizable in the fact that
the absorption lines are not always at the frequencies that are
obtained from the spectrum of a stationary light source. Since blue
light has a higher frequency than red light, the spectral lines of an
approaching astronomical light source exhibit a blue shift and those
of a receding astronomical light source exhibit a redshift.
--- end quoting ---

Now if we look at that picture of a absorption lines shifted and we
turn to a picture of light going through
a prism and refracted, what do we end up with? We end up with the idea
and evidence that shifting of absorption lines is nothing more than a
prism refraction of lines.

It is remarkable that in physics education, how rare that students and
teachers know or learn what Occam's Razor is, as a way of thinking.

So you see two pictures of spectral colors and you see a shifting, and
then you see refraction as the same thing, so why on Earth would
anyone think that the explanation is not refraction but something that
violates
Special Relativity? Someone who does not have a logical mind would
call in some "new idea of a Doppler shift, when in fact, all along it
was just refraction".

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

"Archimedes Plutonium" ha scritto nel messaggio
...
Chapter 8: Experiment that shows us what the redshift truly is--
refraction caused by curvature of the lobes of an Atom Totality.

CHAPT 9 proof that Doppler shift is nonexistent in light waves

are we agree that dopple effect exist and is misurable?

than it depend only to sys referement and v of the beam;
math on that is ok, math model is ok

On Oct 9, 1:45*am, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:
--- quoting ---http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppler_effect
The use of the Doppler effect for light in astronomy depends on our
knowledge that the spectra of stars are not continuous. They exhibit
absorption lines at well defined frequencies that are correlated with
the energies required to excite electrons in various elements from one
level to another. The Doppler effect is recognizable in the fact that
the absorption lines are not always at the frequencies that are
obtained from the spectrum of a stationary light source. Since blue
light has a higher frequency than red light, the spectral lines of an
approaching astronomical light source exhibit a blue shift and those
of a receding astronomical light source exhibit a redshift.
--- end quoting ---

Now if we look at that picture of a absorption lines shifted and we
turn to a picture of light going through
a prism and refracted, what do we end up with? We end up with the idea
and evidence that shifting of absorption lines is nothing more than a
prism refraction of lines.

It is remarkable that in physics education, how rare that students and
teachers know or learn what Occam's Razor is, as a way of thinking.

So you see two pictures of spectral colors and you see a shifting, and
then you see refraction as the same thing, so why on Earth would
anyone think that the explanation is not refraction but something that
violates
Special Relativity? Someone who does not have a logical mind would
call in some "new idea of a Doppler shift, when in fact, all along it
was just refraction".


Alright, there is a prediction already possible with a nonexistent
Doppler
shift on lightwaves. A prediction of an Atom Totality theory with all
shifting
of absorption lines due to refraction. In the case of lobes of a 5f6
Atom
Totality, a tube shape (sausage or cigar shape). A tube shape 5f6
would predict
that we have a blueshift along the length of the tube in two
directions.

Imagine this drawing a long tube:
y y
____________________________________

x x x E x x x

____________________________________

y y y
And imagine E as Earth observers and x as galaxies along the straight
line of sight. It is the rib of this tube for the only straight line
on a tube is parallel to the edges and would be less refracted than
if we looked at galaxies in the direction of y and for which y would
be closer to us than some of those in the rib of the tube.

So the immediate prediction of an Atom Totality theory with the 5f6 as
tube shaped is that we should see a line of sight blueshifted galaxies
in two directions. That the blueshift is geometrical to the above
drawing.

Now I know the reports of blueshift is a tiny data compared to reports
of redshift and that is what it should be in the Atom Totality, but
whether
the reports so far have a rib shaped appearance is what I am
questioning
for if it has that appearance as described above, then that would
count
as very good evidence in favor of the Atom Totality theory.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

On Oct 9, 12:58Â*pm, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:
On Oct 9, 1:45Â*am, Archimedes Plutonium



wrote:
--- quoting ---http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppler_effect
The use of the Doppler effect for light in astronomy depends on our
knowledge that the spectra of stars are not continuous. They exhibit
absorption lines at well defined frequencies that are correlated with
the energies required to excite electrons in various elements from one
level to another. The Doppler effect is recognizable in the fact that
the absorption lines are not always at the frequencies that are
obtained from the spectrum of a stationary light source. Since blue
light has a higher frequency than red light, the spectral lines of an
approaching astronomical light source exhibit a blue shift and those
of a receding astronomical light source exhibit a redshift.
--- end quoting ---

Now if we look at that picture of a absorption lines shifted and we
turn to a picture of light going through
a prism and refracted, what do we end up with? We end up with the idea
and evidence that shifting of absorption lines is nothing more than a
prism refraction of lines.

It is remarkable that in physics education, how rare that students and
teachers know or learn what Occam's Razor is, as a way of thinking.

So you see two pictures of spectral colors and you see a shifting, and
then you see refraction as the same thing, so why on Earth would
anyone think that the explanation is not refraction but something that
violates
Special Relativity? Someone who does not have a logical mind would
call in some "new idea of a Doppler shift, when in fact, all along it
was just refraction".

Alright, there is a prediction already possible with a nonexistent
Doppler
shift on lightwaves. A prediction of an Atom Totality theory with all
shifting
of absorption lines due to refraction. In the case of lobes of a 5f6
Atom
Totality, a tube shape (sausage or cigar shape). A tube shape 5f6
would predict
that we have a blueshift along the length of the tube in two
directions.

Imagine this drawing a long tube:
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* y Â* y
____________________________________

x Â* x Â* Â* x Â* Â* Â*E Â* x Â* Â* x Â* Â*x

____________________________________

Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â*y Â* Â*y Â* Â*y
And imagine E as Earth observers and x as galaxies along the straight
line of sight. It is the rib of this tube for the only straight line
on a tube is parallel to the edges and would be less refracted than
if we looked at galaxies in the direction of y and for which y would
be closer to us than some of those in the rib of the tube.

So the immediate prediction of an Atom Totality theory with the 5f6 as
tube shaped is that we should see a line of sight blueshifted galaxies
in two directions. That the blueshift is geometrical to the above
drawing.

Now I know the reports of blueshift is a tiny data compared to reports
of redshift and that is what it should be in the Atom Totality, but
whether
the reports so far have a rib shaped appearance is what I am
questioning
for if it has that appearance as described above, then that would
count
as very good evidence in favor of the Atom Totality theory.


So here is a first prediction of an Atom Totality where we dismiss the
redshift
completely as nonexistent for Doppler shift but where the redshift and
blueshift
is all due to refraction. One of the first predictions with a all-
refraction caused
shifting is that there can be a line of sight blueshift if the Atom
Totality is tube
shaped.

Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* y Â* y

____________________________________
10x Â* 9x Â* Â* 1x Â* Â* Â*E Â* 1x 2x 3x
____________________________________
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* y Â* Â*y Â* Â*y


Now I numbered the x's to indicate their distance from E. So in an
Atom Totality tube shape, or lobe
of 5f6, and since there is no Doppler shift of light ever possible,
means that the shift is caused
by the curvature of Space. Yet we would have a long line distance of
relatively flat space as a rib
of the tube and where we should see a sort of straight line of
blueshift in both directions.

So far the data reported tells us the Andromeda galaxy is blueshifted,
but we should also have a
galaxy in the opposite direction of Andromeda that is also blueshifted
for it also lies on that
line of sight (the rib of the tube).

Blueshifts of Andromeda 
galaxy.

And we have report of this galaxy as blueshifted.

--- quoting about a quasar blueshift ---
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/np...=2005ApJ...618...
Â*Â*We have obtained optical intermediate-resolution spectra (R=3000)
of 
Â*Â*the narrow-line quasars DMS 0059-0055 and PG 1543+489. The [O
III] 
Â*Â*emission line in DMS 0059-0055 is blueshifted by 880 km s-1
relative 
Â*Â*to Hbeta. We also confirm that the [O III] emission line
in PG 
Â*Â*1543+489 has a relative blueshift of 1150 km s-1.. These two
narrow- 
Â*Â*line quasars show the largest [O III] blueshifts known to
date 
among 
Â*Â*type 1 active galactic nuclei (AGNs). 
Â*Â*--- end
quoting ---


And if the Atom Totality theory is true we should have similar
blueshifts of galaxies in the opposite line direction.

So the prediction of the Atom Totality is that the blueshifts should
be relatively nearby for the most part
and then a line of blueshifts distant and opposite in directions.




Here is a sketch of how the blueshifts of galaxies is finally mapped
out Cosmically:

x x
x x x x x x E x x x x x x
x x


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

On Oct 8, 10:48*pm, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:
Chapter 8: Experiment that shows us what the redshift truly is--
refraction caused by curvature of the lobes of an Atom Totality.

CHAPT 9 proof that Doppler shift is nonexistent in light waves

Subject: Two-Experimentum-crucis that EM has no Doppler shift
possible.

I am going to have fun with this chapter. As mentioned before, in this
edition it is chapter 9
following chapter 8 on the fiberglass experiment, but in the next
edition, 6th edition, this
chapter must precede 8 because why hack and hash around the Doppler
shift when it is
easy to prove it just does not exist for light waves or any EM
spectrum.

So this chapter is about a proof that Doppler shift occurs in sound
waves but never in
EM spectrum.

--- quoting Wikipedia on Doppler ---
In this work, Doppler postulated his principle (later coined the
Doppler effect) that the observed frequency of a wave depends on the
relative speed of the source and the observer, and he tried to use
this concept for explaining the colour of binary stars. The Doppler
effect of sound was verified by Buys Ballot in 1845.

--- end quoting ---

Experimentum Crucis means "deciding experiment" or "crucial
experiment". In the case
of proving light has no Doppler shift possible is based on Special
Relativity experiment done by Michelson in 1887 for if light waves can
be Doppler shifted it would be detected
by Michelson's interferometer.

--- quoting the Michelson experiment of 1887 from Wikipedia
Michelson had a solution to the problem of how to construct a device
sufficiently accurate to detect aether flow. The device he designed,
later known as an interferometer, sent a single source of white light
through a half-silvered mirror that was used to split it into two
beams travelling at right angles to one another. After leaving the
splitter, the beams travelled out to the ends of long arms where they
were reflected back into the middle on small mirrors. They then
recombined on the far side of the splitter in an eyepiece, producing a
pattern of constructive and destructive interference based on the
spent time to transit the arms.
--- end quoting about Michelson experiment ---

The whole entire point of the theory of Special Relativity is that the
speed of light is never
adjusted by the motion of the source or observer, and that means
frequency and wavelength are invariant to the motion of both observer
and source.

Apparently the entire physics and astronomy community from 1900 to
2010 never realized that Doppler shift is impossible with Special
Relativity. It shows us how rare it is to have a
"logical mind" in the sciences. My father used to chide me by saying
"in one ear, out the other". But we should chide the entire physics
and astronomy community for having understood the Doppler effect for
sound waves like a train whistle, but how ignorant was the physics and
astronomy community by taking light waves as Doppler affected and
never really proving the claim. Never really asking "Is the Doppler
effect compatible with
Special Relativity or contradictory"? Remarkable that no-one in
physics or astronomy ever
really tested the question-- "Does the Doppler effect hold for EM
since there is Special Relativity"?

The Michelson Experiment says the Doppler effect is not possible with
Special Relativity.

And the second deciding-experiment is the recent Harvard's
Hua work on "slowed light" for the light going in is white and the
light coming out is white.

http://www.seas.harvard.edu/haulab/
Physical Review Letters cover shows white light going in the
experiment and white light coming out as "slowed light".
Look at that cover of Physical Review Letters and you see the same
white light.

In other words, these experiments of slowed light is a Experimentum-
crucis that light cannot be Doppler shifted.

There is a third practical experiment of just observing lightning bolt
flashes that they are always "white light" never redshifted nor
blueshifted.

And now that the word is out, we can expect many other experiments
showing that EM
cannot have a Doppler effect.

Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Odd that your topic isn't being systematically stalked and bashed to
death by the usual gauntlet of mainstream FUD-masters and rusemasters
that usually don't let anything get past go, much less cross any
finish line.

http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

On Oct 9, 6:08*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Oct 8, 10:48*pm, Archimedes Plutonium



wrote:
Chapter 8: Experiment that shows us what the redshift truly is--
refraction caused by curvature of the lobes of an Atom Totality.

CHAPT 9 proof that Doppler shift is nonexistent in light waves

Subject: Two-Experimentum-crucis that EM has no Doppler shift
possible.

I am going to have fun with this chapter. As mentioned before, in this
edition it is chapter 9
following chapter 8 on the fiberglass experiment, but in the next
edition, 6th edition, this
chapter must precede 8 because why hack and hash around the Doppler
shift when it is
easy to prove it just does not exist for light waves or any EM
spectrum.

So this chapter is about a proof that Doppler shift occurs in sound
waves but never in
EM spectrum.

--- quoting Wikipedia on Doppler ---
In this work, Doppler postulated his principle (later coined the
Doppler effect) that the observed frequency of a wave depends on the
relative speed of the source and the observer, and he tried to use
this concept for explaining the colour of binary stars. The Doppler
effect of sound was verified by Buys Ballot in 1845.

--- end quoting ---

Experimentum Crucis means "deciding experiment" or "crucial
experiment". In the case
of proving light has no Doppler shift possible is based on Special
Relativity experiment done by Michelson in 1887 for if light waves can
be Doppler shifted it would be detected
by Michelson's interferometer.

--- quoting the Michelson experiment of 1887 from Wikipedia
Michelson had a solution to the problem of how to construct a device
sufficiently accurate to detect aether flow. The device he designed,
later known as an interferometer, sent a single source of white light
through a half-silvered mirror that was used to split it into two
beams travelling at right angles to one another. After leaving the
splitter, the beams travelled out to the ends of long arms where they
were reflected back into the middle on small mirrors. They then
recombined on the far side of the splitter in an eyepiece, producing a
pattern of constructive and destructive interference based on the
spent time to transit the arms.
--- end quoting about Michelson experiment ---

The whole entire point of the theory of Special Relativity is that the
speed of light is never
adjusted by the motion of the source or observer, and that means
frequency and wavelength are invariant to the motion of both observer
and source.

Apparently the entire physics and astronomy community from 1900 to
2010 never realized that Doppler shift is impossible with Special
Relativity. It shows us how rare it is to have a
"logical mind" in the sciences. My father used to chide me by saying
"in one ear, out the other". But we should chide the entire physics
and astronomy community for having understood the Doppler effect for
sound waves like a train whistle, but how ignorant was the physics and
astronomy community by taking light waves as Doppler affected and
never really proving the claim. Never really asking "Is the Doppler
effect compatible with
Special Relativity or contradictory"? Remarkable that no-one in
physics or astronomy ever
really tested the question-- "Does the Doppler effect hold for EM
since there is Special Relativity"?

The Michelson Experiment says the Doppler effect is not possible with
Special Relativity.

And the second deciding-experiment is the recent Harvard's
Hua work on "slowed light" for the light going in is white and the
light coming out is white.

http://www.seas.harvard.edu/haulab/
Physical Review Letters cover shows white light going in the
experiment and white light coming out as "slowed light".
Look at that cover of Physical Review Letters and you see the same
white light.

In other words, these experiments of slowed light is a Experimentum-
crucis that light cannot be Doppler shifted.

There is a third practical experiment of just observing lightning bolt
flashes that they are always "white light" never redshifted nor
blueshifted.

And now that the word is out, we can expect many other experiments
showing that EM
cannot have a Doppler effect.

Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Odd that your topic isn't being systematically stalked and bashed to
death by the usual gauntlet of mainstream FUD-masters and rusemasters
that usually don't let anything get past go, much less cross any
finish line.

*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

Holy Mackerel! Archie Poo got a cheerleader!

On Oct 9, 1:24Â*pm, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:
On Oct 9, 12:58Â*pm, Archimedes Plutonium



wrote:
On Oct 9, 1:45Â*am, Archimedes Plutonium

wrote:
--- quoting ---http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppler_effect
The use of the Doppler effect for light in astronomy depends on our
knowledge that the spectra of stars are not continuous. They exhibit
absorption lines at well defined frequencies that are correlated with
the energies required to excite electrons in various elements from one
level to another. The Doppler effect is recognizable in the fact that
the absorption lines are not always at the frequencies that are
obtained from the spectrum of a stationary light source. Since blue
light has a higher frequency than red light, the spectral lines of an
approaching astronomical light source exhibit a blue shift and those
of a receding astronomical light source exhibit a redshift.
--- end quoting ---

Now if we look at that picture of a absorption lines shifted and we
turn to a picture of light going through
a prism and refracted, what do we end up with? We end up with the idea
and evidence that shifting of absorption lines is nothing more than a
prism refraction of lines.

It is remarkable that in physics education, how rare that students and
teachers know or learn what Occam's Razor is, as a way of thinking.

So you see two pictures of spectral colors and you see a shifting, and
then you see refraction as the same thing, so why on Earth would
anyone think that the explanation is not refraction but something that
violates
Special Relativity? Someone who does not have a logical mind would
call in some "new idea of a Doppler shift, when in fact, all along it
was just refraction".

Alright, there is a prediction already possible with a nonexistent
Doppler
shift on lightwaves. A prediction of an Atom Totality theory with all
shifting
of absorption lines due to refraction. In the case of lobes of a 5f6
Atom
Totality, a tube shape (sausage or cigar shape). A tube shape 5f6
would predict
that we have a blueshift along the length of the tube in two
directions.

Imagine this drawing a long tube:
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* y Â* y
____________________________________

x Â* x Â* Â* x Â* Â* Â*E Â* x Â* Â* x Â* Â*x

____________________________________

Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â*y Â* Â*y Â* Â*y
And imagine E as Earth observers and x as galaxies along the straight
line of sight. It is the rib of this tube for the only straight line
on a tube is parallel to the edges and would be less refracted than
if we looked at galaxies in the direction of y and for which y would
be closer to us than some of those in the rib of the tube.

So the immediate prediction of an Atom Totality theory with the 5f6 as
tube shaped is that we should see a line of sight blueshifted galaxies
in two directions. That the blueshift is geometrical to the above
drawing.

Now I know the reports of blueshift is a tiny data compared to reports
of redshift and that is what it should be in the Atom Totality, but
whether
the reports so far have a rib shaped appearance is what I am
questioning
for if it has that appearance as described above, then that would
count
as very good evidence in favor of the Atom Totality theory.

So here is a first prediction of an Atom Totality where we dismiss the
redshift
completely as nonexistent for Doppler shift but where the redshift and
blueshift
is all due to refraction. One of the first predictions with a all-
refraction caused
shifting is that there can be a line of sight blueshift if the Atom
Totality is tube
shaped.

Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* y Â* y

____________________________________
10x Â* 9x Â* Â* 1x Â* Â* Â*E Â* 1x 2x 3x
____________________________________
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â*y Â* Â*y Â* Â*y

Now I numbered the x's to indicate their distance from E. So in an
Atom Totality tube shape, or lobe
of 5f6, and since there is no Doppler shift of light ever possible,
means that the shift is caused
by the curvature of Space. Yet we would have a long line distance of
relatively flat space as a rib
of the tube and where we should see a sort of straight line of
blueshift in both directions.

So far the data reported tells us the Andromeda galaxy is blueshifted,
but we should also have a
galaxy in the opposite direction of Andromeda that is also blueshifted
for it also lies on that
line of sight (the rib of the tube).

Blueshifts of Andromeda 
galaxy.

And we have report of this galaxy as blueshifted.

--- quoting about a quasar blueshift ---http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2005ApJ...618...
Â*Â*We have obtained optical intermediate-resolution spectra (R=3000)
of 
Â*Â*the narrow-line quasars DMS 0059-0055 and PG 1543+489. The [O
III] 
Â*Â*emission line in DMS 0059-0055 is blueshifted by 880 km s-1
relative 
Â*Â*to Hbeta. We also confirm that the [O III] emission line
in PG 
Â*Â*1543+489 has a relative blueshift of 1150 km s-1. These two
narrow- 
Â*Â*line quasars show the largest [O III] blueshifts known to
date 
among 
Â*Â*type 1 active galactic nuclei (AGNs). 
Â*Â*--- end
quoting ---

And if the Atom Totality theory is true we should have similar
blueshifts of galaxies in the opposite line direction.

So the prediction of the Atom Totality is that the blueshifts should
be relatively nearby for the most part
and then a line of blueshifts distant and opposite in directions.

Here is a sketch of how the blueshifts of galaxies is finally mapped
out Cosmically:

Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* x x
x Â*x Â* x Â* Â*x Â* x Â* Â*x Â* Â* E Â*x Â* x Â* Â*x Â* x Â* x Â* Â*x
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* x x



It is alright to stray a little bit here on something that caught my
attention
so long as I do not spend a lot of time on it, and this probably fits
better
into a different chapter, the chapter on galaxy distribution.

Keep in mind that what we know of the galaxies of the Cosmos mapping
and distribution
is based on a Doppler redshift, but in this chapter we prove Doppler
shifting of
light is a fantasy, and nonexistent. That leaves us with refraction as
the cause
of redshift. When it is based on Doppler redshift, we imagine there
are clusters
and superclusters and Walls of galaxies. But the question would be, if
it is based
on refraction, does the Universe all of a sudden have a sort of
uniform distribution
and no Walls and no Voids?

In the previous edition, I cannot remember if it was me or a
respondent that cited
a reference to a mathematical problem of orchards. I think it was a
respondent
who informed the thread that I was doing a old math problem of
orchards.

But let me ask the question pertinent and relevant here and now with
the idea
that all redshift is a refraction issue.

Suppose we had uniform rows of trees in the plane like this:

x x x x x x

x x x x x x

x x x x x x

x x x x x x

x x x x x x

x x x x x x


And now I folded that plane into a cylinder to imitate a lobe of the
5f6 of plutonium atom.
And pretend that we on Earth are sitting in one of those x's peering
into the deepness of
Space at other galaxies, other x's. So the question, is, if redshift
is all refraction caused,
and the Space of the Universe is a lobe or cylinder shape, then, would
we see galaxies
appear to be Walls when in fact they are all evenly spaced apart?

I think I can sort of answer that question by the experiment where we
place a thin rod
into a pool of water and we look down the rod. If not refracted the
rod looks like a small
circle, but in the water, and refracted, it begins to look far greater
in size than just
the circumference of the rod without water and refraction. Due to the
refraction, the rod
now takes on added and increased area, fictional area for it was
refracted.

What I am trying to perceive and penetrate is if the Universe redshift
of galaxies is a refraction
issue and not a Doppler issue, then it is likely that Voids and Walls
were nonexistent and that
the Cosmos of the true mapping of galaxies is like that of a tree
fruit orchard where all the trees
are spaced in a grid system.

In Big Bang astronomy, where redshift is Doppler, a galaxies distance
was all about simply saying what the
Doppler shift was and then you assign a distance based purely on that
Doppler redshift. So that if you had
a whole bunch of galaxies near one another and having the same Doppler
redshift, you assumed they formed a
Wall or Great Wall of galaxies.

In Atom Totality where redshift or blueshift is all refraction
shifting, then you get a curious phenomenon
that the redshift is not a "pure distance indicator" but only a
curvature indicator and that when you
see a distant galaxy with a huge redshift, that galaxy may look far
larger than what it truly is.

With redshift as refraction, you have to sort out the distance along
with what the curvator factor is.
So in the Big Bang the redshift was a linear relationship, a easy and
pure distance indicator. In the Atom
Totality with redshift as refraction, it is not linear for it depends
on curvature.

There is another question involved in all of this. A question of
gravity holding together clusters of galaxies. In the Big Bang they
seemed to feel that you could have gravity bonding of clusters and
superclusters and Walls of galaxies over enormous distances. It is
akin to thinking that some distant star
is gravitational bound to the Solar System. So this concept of
gravitationally bound system, is a concept
that is lacking in modern day physics and astronomy. There should be
some distance factor coupled with the
mass of that distance, that is the cutoff from having gravitational
bonding, in other words, the Great Wall
and Sloan Great Wall are probably not walls at all but rather, we are
seeing refracted galaxies at great
distances which in reality are like the evenly spaced fruit orchard
trees. If you pull up to a vast fruit orchard of its trees evenly
spaced and look as far as you can look you would think that there are
walls
and great-walls of trees, when in truth, they are all evenly spaced
apart.

So the entire mapping and distribution of the galaxies, is in play and
we need a revision, since the redshift
is no longer a Doppler redshift but due to refraction.

P. S. I love the clarity of throwing out Doppler but now with redshift
as refraction, causes upheaval for even the Atom Totality theory,
because under a Wall and Voids, the Atom Totality theory explained
such with the
Double Slit interference pattern and I may have to toss that out, and
in place put an evenly distributed galaxy pattern.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies