|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Earth is more than 10 billion years old & evidence from TV show ORIGINS
Mr. Tyson is the host of this miniseries. I caught a glimpse of only one
program and did not expect to watch any because these things usually are too biased to even call science. They treat speculation as foregone conclusion. They never air a competing theory that makes more sense such as the Atom Totality. And worst they inculcate young people to believe that the Nebular Dust Cloud theory and the Big Bang as proven and foregone conclusion. This is a grave fallacy in Logic that says something like it is ridiculous to think the Nebular Dust Cloud theory with its Earth age at 5 billion years is anything more than speculation when the origins of minor structure on Earth such as where the Oceans of water came from which is a utter unkown. So how can Mr. Tyson keep selling a 5 billion year old Earth and the Nebular Dust Cloud theory of Earth origins and then say the origins of oceans is mysterious. Logically you cannot buy or sell a theory if its minor parts are utterly mysterious. You cannot buy or sell Nebular Dust Cloud theory and then admit that the origin of the oceans is totally mysterious. What you can buy or sell is that the Nebular Dust Cloud theory is a high speculation because oceans are speculation. And Mr. Tyson makes this same fallacy with the Big Bang when there are so many unknowns and mysteries of parts of the Cosmos to say that we believe in the Big Bang is preposterous and pretentious. But seeing that one program having something to do with Michael Mumma and Steven Mojzsis, one about heavy water in comets and heavy water in our oceans and the other having to do with zirconium crystals of their uranium isotopes being the oldest material on Earth at 4.4 billion years. Which got me to thinking. Since I have the theory of Growing Solar System where Earth and Sun and inner planets are 10 billion years old and outer planets only 5 billion years old and where solar systems grow from Dirac radioactivity such as cosmic rays that fall to Earth daily with enormous amounts of energy. So can the origin of the Oceans tell us that Earth is not just 5 billion years old but in fact 10 billion years. Mr. Mumma claims that the comets studied so far have too much heavy water compared to our Ocean water. My question would be, if the Earth were 10 billion years old and not 5, then would not the waters of our Oceans have converted much of that heavy water into regular H2O???? And as for the zirconium dating by Mr. Mojzsis et al, that they then restrict the history of Earth in acquiring an ocean of water to a mere couple of hundred million years which is fast time compared to 5 billion years. But if EArth were truly say 10 billion years old, we get rid of that artificialness and that we can thence say the Earth had a comfortable 5 billion years to acquire all of that ocean water. Which leads me even further to think. If the origin of solar systems is Dirac radioactivity of energy particles shot from the Nucleus of the AtomTotality and that our solar system is growing daily from new particles that land on the planets and Sun over a time period of 10 billion years, then would not such a system build up water in a precise ratio compared to other forms of compounds? In the Utah "Fly Eye" apparatus that collects cosmic-rays some with 10^9 MeV are common occurrences, are some of those collections seeing water where there was no water??? Seems to me that we should be able to compare test the Nebular Dust Cloud theory against the Growing Solar System theory from the case of water. That as the solar system is built the amount of water should be different to those 2 theories. And that the oldest planets with a favorable distance from the Sun should be water collectors. So that the water that existed on Mercury, Venus, Mars and asteroids gradually make their way to EArth and collected on Earth. And that satellites such as Europa of Jupiter have an amount of water that is in agreement with the rate of Dirac radioactivity. In this manner we see that comets are fragments of ancient planets or moons that were destroyed in the 10 billion year age. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - April 30, 2004 | Ron | Misc | 0 | April 30th 04 03:55 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (Long Text) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | UK Astronomy | 3 | December 25th 03 10:41 PM |
Gas Planets Evolve to be Rock planets??? | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 114 | October 16th 03 12:51 PM |
Space Calendar - August 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | August 28th 03 05:32 PM |