Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16

On Feb 24, 3:38 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Feb 24, 2:30 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation





wrote:
On Feb 24, 2:08 pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Feb 24, 8:05 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation

wrote:
On Feb 24, 7:27 am, BradGuth wrote:" Oddly, NASA/
Apollo moon was extensively 0.65~0.75 albedo reflective, because
those moon suits were worth an albedo of 0.85, and everything getting
xenon lamp spectrum illuminated to boot, because there's nothing
bluish about our NASA/Apollo unfiltered Kodak moments, and strangely
Venus is never anywhere in sight. Why are you so unable or unwilling
to deal with the truth of whatever's off-world? There's so much more
to space than mere eye candy. There's actual
science that's easily peer replicated, of photographic science telling
us about the given geology and mineralogy of places and of interesting
things other than Earth."

Laughing, you just posted the same old trash, but in a slightly
repackaged form, but the problem is you have not shown any reduction
of you idiocy, or ignorance. In order for you to analyze the images
like you have, you need to not just know film type and speed, but the
lens used, and the f/stop, and resulting exposure time all of which
determine how white an astronauts space suit is compared to the back
round, midtones etc. Once again regurgitating numbers from what
"should have been" seen does not address the image itself, and so you
keep looking for things, but you clearly do not have an understanding
of what you are looking at, or how the image was produced. Now the
same principles that I have stated apply to the analysis of all
images, so your diatribes into what im not addressing are a joke, and
your demands for me to answer your loaded questions are an even bigger
joke, thanks for the Sunday morning laugh brad.... And no im not
"unwilling to deal with the truth of whatever's off-world" as you just
stated, but I do love to learn about earth, including from the unique
view the astronauts have aboard the ISS.

http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...-16/html/iss01...
International Space Station Imagery
"ISS016-E-008436 (26 Oct. 2007) --- Beirut Metropolitan Area, Lebanon
is featured in this image photographed by an Expedition 16 crewmember
on the International Space Station. The capital of Lebanon, Beirut is
located along the southeastern shoreline of the Mediterranean Sea.
According to geologists, the metropolitan area is built on a small
peninsula composed mainly of sedimentary rock deposited over the past
100 million years or so. The growth of the city eastwards is bounded
by foothills of the more mountainous interior of Lebanon (sparsely
settled greenish brown region visible at upper right). While this
sedimentary platform is stable, the country of Lebanon is located
along a major transform fault zone, or region where the African and
Arabian tectonic plates are moving laterally in relation to (and
against) each other. This active tectonism creates an earthquake
hazard for the country. The Roum Fault, one of the fault strands that
is part of the transform boundary, is located directly to the south of
the Beirut metropolitan area. Other distinctive features visible in
this image include the Rafic Hariri Airport at lower right, the city
sports arena at center, and several areas of green and open space
(such a large golf course at center). Also visible in the image are
several plumes of sediment along the coastline -- the most striking of
which are located near the airport. The general lack of vegetation in
the airport may promote higher degrees of soil transport by surface
water runoff or wind."

If that's what makes our Earth-only mindset puppet-masters like
yourself happy campers, then so be it. No wonder we're headed for
WWIII, $10/gallon and $1/kwhr just as fast as you folks and fellow
rusemasters of the Old Testament thumping kind can manage.

Keep pretending that all off-world matters simply do not matter, as
well as naysaying as to the ongoing demise of our frail environment at
the same time. After all, it's what your God(s) would appreciate more
than anything else.

BTW, did you go to your pretend atheists sunday school, and teach
those unfortunate kids how to lie their infomercial spewing little
butts off, by way of avoiding the truth via excluding science or
banishing related evidence that could otherwise rock your mainstream
status quo boat?
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

so what you just admitted is that your argument in this thread (and
your image analysis skills for that matter) has been completely
reduced down to you making illogical attacks on me, that's pathetic
brad....

"http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/station/crew-16/html/
iss016e021564.html
International Space Station Imagery
ISS016-E-021564 (7 Jan. 2008) --- Paris, France is featured in this
image photographed by an Expedition 16 crewmember on the International
Space Station. A crisp, clear winter day over France provided a
detailed view of the city of Paris. This image shows the recognizable
street pattern of the city - and some of the world's most notable
landmarks - along the Seine River. One of the main avenues radiating
like spokes from the Arc de Triomphe (lower right) is the Avenue des
Champs-Elysees running southeast to the Garden of Tuileries (Jardin
des Tuileries). The garden -- recognizable by its light green color
relative to the surrounding built materials -- was originally
commissioned by Catherine de Medici in 1559, and is now bounded by the
Place de la Concorde to the northeast and the Louvre museum along the
Seine River at the southeast end. Other, similarly colored parks and
greenspaces are visible throughout the image. Farther south on the
Seine is the Ile de la Cite, location of the famous Notre Dame
cathedral. Perhaps most prominent is the characteristic "A" profile of
the Eiffel Tower west of the Jardin des Tuileries, highlighted by
morning sunlight"

There's nothing pathetic about sharing the whole truth and nothing but
the truth. Apparently you've got a big problem with that, as much as
you can't tolerate honestly deductive thinking unless it's Old
Testament certified.

BTW, if Venus along with its unlimited local energy cache to burn
(sort of speak) isn't ET doable (including on behalf of us), then
perhaps no other planet in the universe is worthy of a viable habitat
or as a mineral resource. With all the MRSA, Stauff and numerous
hybrid forms of humanly lethal pestilence running amuck, not to
mention animal/plant extinctions and of even hybrid plant rot taking
place and mother nature going GW postal as we prepare ourselves for
WWIII, as such Earth is not exactly ET worthy, especially after
humanity has so terribly pillaged, raped and mostly burned off its
fossil fuels with no apparent regard for the future of having far less
dry land for 1e10 souls to survive upon.

Just for those of you that either can't or wouldn't dare think
independently within the box, much less deductively think outside,
here's a little something that's quite interesting, as getting the
peer reviewed benefit of the doubt.

Alex Collier / By Michael Salla, PhDhttp://www.exopolitics.orghttp://www.rense.com/general54/zlecx.htmhttp://utenti.lycos.it/paolaharris/acollier_eng.htmhttp://www.exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-66.htm
plus many other links worth getting our undivided attention.

For those of you hell bent upon sticking with your terrestrial limited
God(s), never mind because, no matters what the evidence or physics
backing up the best available science, there's simply no hope for
those in charge of snookering humanity for all it's worth, or
otherwise simply self dumbfounded past the point of no return. In
other words, there's not much sense in beating a dead horse to death.
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Laughing, yeah yeah, you like to imply that you are something special
and belong on some self elevated pedestal based on your opinions. So
in essence buried in your weak attempts at insults, is you stating
your opinion, which is that you think your opinions are correct, and
not a surprise at all based on the ego you have presented on usenet,
but that does not make them valid or correct, nor does it make your
loaded questions relevant... laughing even more....

http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...16e005121.html
"International Space Station Imagery
ISS016-E-005121 (21 Oct. 2007) --- Wellington, New Zealand is featured
in this image photographed by an Expedition 16 crewmember on the
International Space Station. New Zealand's capital of Wellington is
located at the southwestern tip of North Island near the Cook Strait.
The city is the second largest in New Zealand (after Auckland), and at
41 degrees south latitude, it is the southernmost capital city of the
world. The North and South Islands of New Zealand are located along
the active Australian-Pacific tectonic plate boundary -- the Islands
are only a small part of a larger submerged fragment of continental
crust. The glancing collision of these two tectonic plates results in
uplift of the land surface, expressed as low hills on North Island and
the Southern Alps on South Island. Local topography visible in this
view is a result of these tectonic forces and weathering processes,
which have exerted a strong influence on the morphology of the city.
Tightly clustered white rooftops and high building density of the
central business district are visible to the south of the Westpac
Stadium between vegetated (green) northeast-southwest trending ridges.
Lower density development (gray gridded regions with scattered white
rooftops) has spread eastwards along the Miramar Peninsula. Five major
faults that run through the Wellington metropolitan area; the largest
magnitude earthquake recorded in New Zealand (approximately 8.2 on the
Richter Scale) occurred in 1855 on one of these (the Wairarapa Fault).
Recognition of the potential seismic hazard in the metropolitan area
has led to adoption of building codes to maximize structural
resistance to earthquake damage."