A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 30th 04, 04:36 PM
House Widdershins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor

X-No Archive:Yes On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 03:43:47 GMT, *
wrote:

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:39:44 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:

In our last episode,
,
the lovely and talented *
broadcast on alt.politics:

A sustainable, containable, fusion reaction has already been built -- the
technology is suppressed.


Exactly as quacks and cranks always say.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak


http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/...sti_id=6807354


http://www.climatetechnology.gov/lib...ions-2-2-1.pdf


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power


None of these links lead to anything that suggests that
sustainable fusion reactions have been achieved.


Yes they do.


Reading comprehension problem noted.



Widdershins

Roll over and play smart.
  #12  
Old April 30th 04, 04:44 PM
House Widdershins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor

X-No Archive:Yes On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:32:19 +0200, "Laura"
wrote:


Nowhere on those websites does it say that it's existing and applicable
technology. In fact, one of them clearly states "being developed" about some
of the most crucial elements needed to make it work - most notably the
fusion itself! The rest deals with theory, which is perfectly sound.
The fact remains that, so far, the only practical fusion device possible is
the thermonuclear bomb.

By the way, why does all of this matter to you, anyway?
I thought you said that you, along with a select few others, will be whisked
away by aliens, and the rest of us are going to die horribly when we're
clobbered by an asteroid in 2012. If that's true, what difference does it
make what we use as an energy source for the next 8 years?

Laura, Laura, Laura. It has probably come to your notice that
Alexa isn't quite playing with a full deck. IOW she's a sandwich
shy of a picnic, a few bricks shy of a load, not the brightest bulb
in the GE lineup, not the sharpest knife in the drawer. To wit:
She's a loony!



Widdershins

Skepticult Member #159-904378-909
  #13  
Old April 30th 04, 04:45 PM
*
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:35:42 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote:

X-No Archive:Yes On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:39:44 -0500, Lars Eighner
wrote:

In our last episode,
,
the lovely and talented *
broadcast on alt.politics:

A sustainable, containable, fusion reaction has already been built -- the
technology is suppressed.


Exactly as quacks and cranks always say.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak


http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/...sti_id=6807354


http://www.climatetechnology.gov/lib...ions-2-2-1.pdf


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power


None of these links lead to anything that suggests that
sustainable fusion reactions have been achieved.


Didn't I say that just a little while ago?


Yes, and yo and your sock puppets are still lying.



Widdershins

Dark Prince of the Kook Central Cabal (TINKCC)
Evil Overlord blah, blah, blah
You get the idea.


  #14  
Old April 30th 04, 04:45 PM
*
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:36:41 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote:

X-No Archive:Yes On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 03:43:47 GMT, *
wrote:

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:39:44 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:

In our last episode,
,
the lovely and talented *
broadcast on alt.politics:

A sustainable, containable, fusion reaction has already been built -- the
technology is suppressed.

Exactly as quacks and cranks always say.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak

http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/...sti_id=6807354

http://www.climatetechnology.gov/lib...ions-2-2-1.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power

None of these links lead to anything that suggests that
sustainable fusion reactions have been achieved.


Yes they do.


Reading comprehension problem noted.


Nope.



Widdershins

Roll over and play smart.


  #15  
Old April 30th 04, 04:46 PM
*
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:44:32 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote:

Alexa isn't quite playing with a full deck


Slander noted.

  #16  
Old April 30th 04, 05:04 PM
Lars Eighner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor

In our last episode,
,
the lovely and talented House Widdershins
broadcast on alt.politics:

X-No Archive:Yes On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:32:19 +0200, "Laura"
wrote:



Nowhere on those websites does it say that it's existing and applicable
technology. In fact, one of them clearly states "being developed" about some
of the most crucial elements needed to make it work - most notably the
fusion itself! The rest deals with theory, which is perfectly sound.
The fact remains that, so far, the only practical fusion device possible is
the thermonuclear bomb.

By the way, why does all of this matter to you, anyway?
I thought you said that you, along with a select few others, will be whisked
away by aliens, and the rest of us are going to die horribly when we're
clobbered by an asteroid in 2012. If that's true, what difference does it
make what we use as an energy source for the next 8 years?

Laura, Laura, Laura. It has probably come to your notice that
Alexa isn't quite playing with a full deck. IOW she's a sandwich
shy of a picnic, a few bricks shy of a load, not the brightest bulb
in the GE lineup, not the sharpest knife in the drawer.


Do you mean to say her elevator doesn't go all the way to the top?
She's one taco short of a fiesta plate? She's skipped a cog?
She's off her trolley? She's got a screw loose? The lights are
on but nobody's home? She's out to lunch? Mad as a monkey on a trike?
Not hitting on all cylinders? She hasn't got both oars in the water?
There are no phones on the planet Pluto? She is living in cloud
cuckoo land? The wheel is spinning but the hampster's dead?

To wit:
She's a loony!


Which one of us the sock puppet?

Widdershins


Skepticult Member #159-904378-909

--
Lars Eighner -finger for geek code- http://www.io.com/~eighner/
"With a heavy dose of fear and violence, and a lot of money for projects,
I think we can convince these people that we are here to help them"
-- Lt. Col. Nathan Sassaman
  #17  
Old April 30th 04, 05:10 PM
*
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:04:46 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:

Laura, Laura, Laura. It has probably come to your notice that
Alexa isn't quite playing with a full deck. IOW she's a sandwich
shy of a picnic, a few bricks shy of a load, not the brightest bulb
in the GE lineup, not the sharpest knife in the drawer.


Do you mean to say her elevator doesn't go all the way to the top?
She's one taco short of a fiesta plate? She's skipped a cog?
She's off her trolley? She's got a screw loose? The lights are
on but nobody's home? She's out to lunch? Mad as a monkey on a trike?
Not hitting on all cylinders? She hasn't got both oars in the water?
There are no phones on the planet Pluto? She is living in cloud
cuckoo land? The wheel is spinning but the hampster's dead?


And no one but a gullible idiot would believe that.

It's obvious even to the village idiot that fusion technology is suppressed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak

US citizens know the US government lies, no one believes them.

What is the horrible truth, is that the US government has been supplanted by
a fascist regime of defense contractors, arms and drug dealers. They've
resorted to fascism to maintain power:

http://www.omnicenter.org/warpeacecollection/facism.htm

The 14 Defining Characteristics Of Fascism
Free Inquiry http://www.secularhumanism.org/fi/
Spring 2003; 5-11-03

Dr. Lawrence Britt has examined the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany),
Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia) and several Latin
American regimes. Britt found 14 defining characteristics common to each:

1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make
constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other
paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing
and in public displays.

2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights - Because of fear of enemies
and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that
human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people
tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions,
assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.

3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are
rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a
perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities;
liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.

4. Supremacy of the Military - Even when there are widespread domestic
problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government
funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service
are glamorized.

5. Rampant Sexism - The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost
exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles
are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and
the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution.

6. Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes to (sic) media is directly controlled
by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by
government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives.
Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.

7. Obsession with National Security - Fear is used as a motivational tool by
the government over the masses.

8. Religion and Government are Intertwined - Governments in fascist nations
tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate
public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government
leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically
opposed
to the government's policies or actions.

9. Corporate Power is Protected - The industrial and business aristocracy of
a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into
power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and
power elite.

10. Labor Power is Suppressed - Because the organizing power of labor is the
only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated
entirely, or are severely suppressed.

11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts - Fascist nations tend to promote
and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not
uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested.
Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked.

12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - Under fascist regimes, the police
are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often
willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the
name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually
unlimited power in fascist nations.

13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - Fascist regimes almost always are
governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to
government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect
their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for
national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright
stolen by government leaders.

14. Fraudulent Elections - Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a
complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns
against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation
to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation
of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to
manipulate or control elections.




  #18  
Old April 30th 04, 05:42 PM
Carl R. Osterwald
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:04:46 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:

Laura, Laura, Laura. It has probably come to your notice that
Alexa isn't quite playing with a full deck. IOW she's a sandwich
shy of a picnic, a few bricks shy of a load, not the brightest bulb
in the GE lineup, not the sharpest knife in the drawer.


Do you mean to say her elevator doesn't go all the way to the top?
She's one taco short of a fiesta plate? She's skipped a cog?
She's off her trolley? She's got a screw loose? The lights are
on but nobody's home? She's out to lunch? Mad as a monkey on a trike?
Not hitting on all cylinders? She hasn't got both oars in the water?
There are no phones on the planet Pluto? She is living in cloud
cuckoo land? The wheel is spinning but the hampster's dead?


And no one but a gullible idiot would believe that.

It's obvious even to the village idiot that fusion technology is suppressed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak

US citizens know the US government lies, no one believes them.

What is the horrible truth, is that the US government has been supplanted by
a fascist regime of defense contractors, arms and drug dealers. They've
resorted to fascism to maintain power:

http://www.omnicenter.org/warpeacecollection/facism.htm

The 14 Defining Characteristics Of Fascism
Free Inquiry http://www.secularhumanism.org/fi/
Spring 2003; 5-11-03

Dr. Lawrence Britt has examined the fascist regimes of Hitler FLUSH


Screed du jour post #4. Godwin invoked again.


-=-=-=-=-

Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, Gubmint Disinformation
Agent, and "Dr. Green" Sockpuppet.
  #19  
Old April 30th 04, 10:13 PM
Alexander Whiteside
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor

Let's suppose, just for a second, that someone did indeed supress usable
(more juice out than in) fusion reactor technology (after all, there are
functional fusion reactors around already).

Why would they do such a thing? Surely having a 50-year head-start on all
the other fusion reactor projects would allow them to get loads of patents
out and make a mint on selling the tech to power companies?


  #20  
Old April 30th 04, 11:46 PM
Laura
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor


"House Widdershins" wrote in message
...
X-No Archive:Yes On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:32:19 +0200, "Laura"
wrote:


Nowhere on those websites does it say that it's existing and applicable
technology. In fact, one of them clearly states "being developed" about

some
of the most crucial elements needed to make it work - most notably the
fusion itself! The rest deals with theory, which is perfectly sound.
The fact remains that, so far, the only practical fusion device possible

is
the thermonuclear bomb.

By the way, why does all of this matter to you, anyway?
I thought you said that you, along with a select few others, will be

whisked
away by aliens, and the rest of us are going to die horribly when we're
clobbered by an asteroid in 2012. If that's true, what difference does it
make what we use as an energy source for the next 8 years?

Laura, Laura, Laura. It has probably come to your notice that
Alexa isn't quite playing with a full deck. IOW she's a sandwich
shy of a picnic, a few bricks shy of a load, not the brightest bulb
in the GE lineup, not the sharpest knife in the drawer. To wit:
She's a loony!


Oh hush! You're spoiling it! :-)


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Our future as a species - Fermi Paradox revisted - Where they all are william mook Policy 157 November 19th 03 01:19 AM
N by M Body Fusion Charles Cagle Astronomy Misc 0 August 31st 03 11:30 PM
New UK technology will make the first global X-ray map of the Moon(Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 0 August 22nd 03 02:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.