|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Oberg: "The real significance of the ISS thruster test failure"
Chris Bennetts wrote: Zarya isn't just fitted with fuel lines, it can store a significant amount of fuel in its own tanks. I'm not sure where they are located on the module (probably in the 'flared' section), but they are a lot closer to the docking port in question than the aft end of Zvezda. On the Cosmos TKS module from which it's derived they are external. Pat |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Oberg: "The real significance of the ISS thruster test failure"
Jorge R. Frank wrote: The ballistic number of the current config is 166.0 kg/m^2 while flying in XVV (normal low-beta) attitude. That's a mass/area ratio; the higher the number, the *less* draggy the station is. The ballistic number of the station at assembly complete will be 70.02 kg/m^2, which is considerably less draggy than the current config. Both of those numbers are average values to account for the changing frontal area of the rotating solar arrays. But there's also overall station mass to contend with as far as accelerating it goes. It's also obvious to me that the Russians are sitting on a nice fat propellant reserve of over 4000 kg, and that if they really felt the need, they could boost ISS up to a 425 km circular orbit any time they wanted to and still have nearly 1000 kg of propellant left over for attitude control. Did we ever determine if the propellant feed could go to the Progress from the station, rather than the other way around? Pat |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Oberg: "The real significance of the ISS thruster test failure"
Pat Flannery wrote in
: But there's also overall station mass to contend with as far as accelerating it goes. Henry addressed that. It's also obvious to me that the Russians are sitting on a nice fat propellant reserve of over 4000 kg, and that if they really felt the need, they could boost ISS up to a 425 km circular orbit any time they wanted to and still have nearly 1000 kg of propellant left over for attitude control. Did we ever determine if the propellant feed could go to the Progress from the station, rather than the other way around? Yes, it can. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Oberg: "The real significance of the ISS thruster test failure"
Jorge R. Frank wrote: The ballistic number of the station at assembly complete will be 70.02 kg/m^2, which is considerably less draggy than the current config. Oops - got that backward; the final config is more draggy. Yeah, I kind of thought so with all the modules sticking out at the front end. Of course, that the final configuration actually is seems to change from month-to-month. Pat |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Oberg: "The real significance of the ISS thruster test failure"
Bruce Hoult wrote: Hold it a second! Are you saying that the total amount of Newtons of energy to move the ISS from one orbital altitude to another is unrelated to the total mass of the ISS to be moved? This is a simple matter of mass to the thrust applied to it to change it's velocity, and therefore its orbital altitude. Double the ISS' mass and the same amount of Progress delta v only affects its orbital velocity by one half as much. Yes, but if you double its mass then it'll only lose half as much altitude between reboosts. Assuming that drag stays the same; but as Jorge pointed out, drag is going to increase as it grows in size. Pat |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Oberg: "The real significance of the ISS thruster test failure"
Rand Simberg wrote: This is a simple matter of mass to the thrust applied to it to change it's velocity, and therefore its orbital altitude. Double the ISS' mass and the same amount of Progress delta v only affects its orbital velocity by one half as much. But it only has to be done half as often. The total amount of propellant required for reboost doesn't change over time. That is a function of drag, not mass. But the lower you stay, the more the drag increases. Pat |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Oberg: "The real significance of the ISS thruster test failure"
Chuck Stewart wrote: In other words to maintain a given orbital height for ISS you need to counteract the amount of delta-v lost to drag with an equivalent amount of delta-v from the engines... and the denser the station is the *less it's affected by LEO aerodynamic drag.* True; it's a matter of total frontal area versus mass (the classic case being that spherical satellite we launched for measuring the Earth's gravity field that had the covering of retroreflectors and the depleted uranium core) But at the lower altitude drag increases, and if it weren't for the desire to boost maximum mass to the ISS' orbit, a higher orbit would be better. What's the specific trade-off? Does not decreasing the Progress propellant cargo load enough to let it reach a orbit ten miles higher let it carry enough extra propellant to make it worth letting the ISS' orbit decay down an extra ten miles? This makes sense in relation to non-propellant related cargo, but what about the total delta v that the added propellant load can give the ISS? Pat |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Oberg: "The real significance of the ISS thruster test failure"
Pat Flannery wrote:
Rand Simberg wrote: This is a simple matter of mass to the thrust applied to it to change it's velocity, and therefore its orbital altitude. Double the ISS' mass and the same amount of Progress delta v only affects its orbital velocity by one half as much. But it only has to be done half as often. The total amount of propellant required for reboost doesn't change over time. That is a function of drag, not mass. But the lower you stay, the more the drag increases. Yes, so it requires a little more boost propellant, but not twice as much. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Oberg: "The real significance of the ISS thruster test failure"
Pat Flannery wrote in
: Jorge R. Frank wrote: The ballistic number of the station at assembly complete will be 70.02 kg/m^2, which is considerably less draggy than the current config. Oops - got that backward; the final config is more draggy. Yeah, I kind of thought so with all the modules sticking out at the front end. It's not the modules that make up the bulk of the area; it's the solar arrays and radiators. Of course, that the final configuration actually is seems to change from month-to-month. The only major difference in frontal area between the config I quoted above and the "current" config is the deletion of the Russian Science Power Platform. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Oberg: "The real significance of the ISS thruster test failure"
Jorge R. Frank wrote: Yeah, I kind of thought so with all the modules sticking out at the front end. It's not the modules that make up the bulk of the area; it's the solar arrays and radiators. No, looking at the huge model (one of my favorites) you can feather the solar arrays so that the present minimal drag to the ISS as she travels forward through space, and the radiators are put in her drag shadow. Christ; that thing's HUGE. Of course, that the final configuration actually is seems to change from month-to-month. The only major difference in frontal area between the config I quoted above and the "current" config is the deletion of the Russian Science Power Platform. Again, on the Intermountain Railways model....with the implied proviso "get ****in real". (anyone who hasn't built that model hasn't gotten any real idea exactly _how_ big the original ISS proposal was intended to be. I've got a Mir; I've got two Salyuts: I've got a Skylab.... that SOB is gigantic.) Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA PDF - Apollo Experience Reports - 114 reports | Rusty | History | 1 | July 27th 05 03:52 AM |
Teleportation knowledge analizer of the internet matirx! IT's a | Roger wilco | History | 4 | July 8th 05 06:11 PM |
Test firing Saturn 5 listing | Capcom | History | 12 | December 17th 03 01:43 AM |