|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why Not Use TSA Pat-Down Procedures for Stupid Drivers (There's MoreAutomobile Crashes)?
Is it because airplane passenger surveillance becomes easier at
airports, and one's chances of being involved in an aircraft accident are about 1 in 11 million? On the other hand, one's chances of being killed in an automobile accident are 1 in 5000. Thus it would seem that "Pat-Downs" are on the side of job convenience more than job performance, and they are also unneccessary when it comes to anything but intercontinental flights. American "They are living proof that empty heads and stuffed shirts go together" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why Not Use TSA Pat-Down Procedures for Stupid Drivers (There'sMore Automobile Crashes)?
On Nov 24, 11:14*am, American wrote:
Is it because airplane passenger surveillance becomes easier at airports, and one's chances of being involved in an aircraft accident are about 1 in 11 million? On the other hand, one's chances of being killed in an automobile accident are 1 in 5000. Thus it would seem that "Pat-Downs" are on the side of job convenience more than job performance, and they are also unneccessary when it comes to anything but intercontinental flights. American "They are living proof that empty heads and stuffed shirts go together" I feel safer since I heard wé will soon need a patdown just to board a car |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why Not Use TSA Pat-Down Procedures for Stupid Drivers (There'sMore Automobile Crashes)?
On Nov 24, 11:24*am, Alf Alienated wrote:
On Nov 24, 11:14*am, American wrote: Is it because airplane passenger surveillance becomes easier at airports, and one's chances of being involved in an aircraft accident are about 1 in 11 million? On the other hand, one's chances of being killed in an automobile accident are 1 in 5000. Thus it would seem that "Pat-Downs" are on the side of job convenience more than job performance, and they are also unneccessary when it comes to anything but intercontinental flights. American "They are living proof that empty heads and stuffed shirts go together" I feel safer since I heard wé will soon need a patdown just to board a car My whole point was, that it is the "crash" potential that should justify the pat-down, not just an "arbitrary pat-down", in order to convey the false perception that one is more safe when entering an airplane, or even an automobile, for that matter. American "Their business is what's none of their business" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why Not Use TSA Pat-Down Procedures for Stupid Drivers (There'sMore Automobile Crashes)?
On Nov 24, 4:03*pm, HVAC wrote:
On 11/24/2010 8:14 AM, American wrote: Is it because airplane passenger surveillance becomes easier at airports, and one's chances of being involved in an aircraft accident are about 1 in 11 million? On the other hand, one's chances of being killed in an automobile accident are 1 in 5000. Thus it would seem that "Pat-Downs" are on the side of job convenience more than job performance, and they are also unneccessary when it comes to anything but intercontinental flights. I went through airport screening a couple of weeks ago. After the scanner, they pulled me aside for further inspection. I asked them why, and they told me they thought I was hiding something in my groin area.....They were surprised to find out it was all me when I whipped out my jimmy. all drivers will be tested for illegal drug use before qualifying for a drivers license. every driver will be supplying hair and urine samples at the DSA drivers safety authority..... TSA should just have dog sniffying dogs walk by all flyers, sniffying for explosives.... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why Not Use TSA Pat-Down Procedures for Stupid Drivers (There'sMore Automobile Crashes)?
On 11/24/2010 8:14 AM, American wrote:
Is it because airplane passenger surveillance becomes easier at airports, and one's chances of being involved in an aircraft accident are about 1 in 11 million? On the other hand, one's chances of being killed in an automobile accident are 1 in 5000. Thus it would seem that "Pat-Downs" are on the side of job convenience more than job performance, and they are also unneccessary when it comes to anything but intercontinental flights. I went through airport screening a couple of weeks ago. After the scanner, they pulled me aside for further inspection. I asked them why, and they told me they thought I was hiding something in my groin area.....They were surprised to find out it was all me when I whipped out my jimmy. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Why Not Use TSA Pat-Down Procedures for Stupid Drivers (There'sMore Automobile Crashes)?
American wrote:
Is it because airplane passenger surveillance becomes easier at airports, and one's chances of being involved in an aircraft accident are about 1 in 11 million? On the other hand, one's chances of being killed in an automobile accident are 1 in 5000. Thus it would seem that "Pat-Downs" are on the side of job convenience more than job performance, and they are also unneccessary when it comes to anything but intercontinental flights. American "They are living proof that empty heads and stuffed shirts go together" The 4th amendment apparently means NOTHING to Americans. Isn't it easier and faster to just take your pants off and put them in the tray instead of emptying your pockets and removing your belt? Mandatory colonoscopies next year. -- LSMFT Simple job, assist the assistant of the physicist. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why Not Use TSA Pat-Down Procedures for Stupid Drivers (There's More Automobile Crashes)?
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 04:45:39PM -0500, LSMFT wrote:
American wrote: Is it because airplane passenger surveillance becomes easier at airports, and one's chances of being involved in an aircraft accident are about 1 in 11 million? On the other hand, one's chances of being killed in an automobile accident are 1 in 5000. Thus it would seem that "Pat-Downs" are on the side of job convenience more than job performance, and they are also unneccessary when it comes to anything but intercontinental flights. American "They are living proof that empty heads and stuffed shirts go together" The 4th amendment apparently means NOTHING to Americans. Isn't it easier and faster to just take your pants off and put them in the tray instead of emptying your pockets and removing your belt? Mandatory colonoscopies next year. Before long, air travel will be just as it is portrayed in "The Filfth Element". Travel anywhere, and you'll be unconscious for the duration. On the bright side, if the plane goes down, you won't have time to be frightened, vomit in the air-sick bag, or complain to the buxom stewardess. Robert Collins |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Why Not Use TSA Pat-Down Procedures for Stupid Drivers (There'sMore Automobile Crashes)?
On Nov 24, 2:05*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
" wrote: ... dog sniffying dogs ... Uh, yeah, right... -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar *territory." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * --G. Behn obviously I meant explosive sniffing dogs my bad colonscpies next year with butt plug securely installed till you arrive at destination. the pre colonscopy laxative prep will guarantee you dont have to go #2 in flight. as a matter of fact all passengers will be required to remain seated till arrival. the new locking safety belts wouldnt electronically unlock till your at your destination...... airlines will no longer serve beverages and everyone will wear the required diaper just in case. the new TSA diaper fee of 20 bucks will be mandatory. after all its a fed government diaper so 20 bucks will be cheap!!! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Why Not Use TSA Pat-Down Procedures for Stupid Drivers (There'sMore Automobile Crashes)?
On Nov 25, 12:14*am, American wrote:
Is it because airplane passenger surveillance becomes easier at airports, and one's chances of being involved in an aircraft accident are about 1 in 11 million? On the other hand, one's chances of being killed in an automobile accident are 1 in 5000. Thus it would seem that "Pat-Downs" are on the side of job convenience more than job performance, and they are also unneccessary when it comes to anything but intercontinental flights. American "They are living proof that empty heads and stuffed shirts go together" Just another step of invasion of your privacy. Dont worry, soon you will have to carry an implanted chip, which will be be provided after you have been suitably screened as as 'approved citizen'. Read Stan Deyo's "Cosmic Conspiracy" written about 35 years ago. BOfL |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Node2 installation procedures | John Doe | Space Station | 0 | October 26th 07 08:35 AM |
NASA To Review Psychological Screening Procedures | Steven L. | Space Shuttle | 29 | February 12th 07 06:06 PM |
NASA To Review Psychological Screening Procedures | Steven L. | Policy | 28 | February 12th 07 06:06 PM |
stupid woman writes stupid article | Allison Kirkpatrick | Amateur Astronomy | 78 | August 19th 04 12:28 PM |
There Are No Stupid Questions, Only Stupid People... | Ed O'Neill | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | August 28th 03 02:01 PM |