Correlation between CMBR and Redshift Anisotropies.

On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 02:07:57 GMT, "Minor Crank"
wrote:

"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message

rate
when lifted into orbit, and thus is not in accordance with observation.

General relativity has passed all critical tests made of it to date.

So has Wilsonian mechanics.

Crank, do you really think a maths theory can affect physical attributes?
The orbiting clocks are known to have changed their rates. If different
clocks
change by different amounts then that proves conclusively that GR is
wrong.

And YOUR theory has been CONCLUSIVELY falsified.

Crank, TIME doesn't change in gravity gradients. Clocks do. You can see it
happening in the GPS.


Minor Crank



Henri Wilson.

See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm

"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message
...

Crank, TIME doesn't change in gravity gradients. Clocks do. You can see it
happening in the GPS.

YOUR theory predicts that cesium beam clocks and rubidium glass cell
oscillators should differ in their behavior when lifted into orbit.

What is found is that exactly the SAME correction (which corresponds to the
GR prediction) must be applied to them both, therefore YOUR theory is wrong,
disproven, false, and stupid.

Minor Crank

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:27:45 GMT, "Minor Crank"
wrote:

"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message
.. .

Crank, TIME doesn't change in gravity gradients. Clocks do. You can see it
happening in the GPS.

YOUR theory predicts that cesium beam clocks and rubidium glass cell
oscillators should differ in their behavior when lifted into orbit.

What is found is that exactly the SAME correction (which corresponds to the
GR prediction) must be applied to them both, therefore YOUR theory is wrong,
disproven, false, and stupid.

Do you really believe that Crank? Has anyone rigorously measured the rates of
different clocks in free fall?

Minor Crank



Henri Wilson.

See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm

Henri Wilson wrote:

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:27:45 GMT, "Minor Crank"
wrote:

"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message
.. .

Crank, TIME doesn't change in gravity gradients. Clocks do. You can see it
happening in the GPS.

YOUR theory predicts that cesium beam clocks and rubidium glass cell
oscillators should differ in their behavior when lifted into orbit.

What is found is that exactly the SAME correction (which corresponds to the
GR prediction) must be applied to them both, therefore YOUR theory is wrong,
disproven, false, and stupid.

Do you really believe that Crank? Has anyone rigorously measured the rates of
different clocks in free fall?

Yeah, stooopid,

Each of the 24 GPS satellites carries either four cesium atomic clocks
or three rubidum atomic clocks in orbit. Uncle Al cannot see how that
sums to fewer than 72 extremely precise clocks in freefall constantly
being addressed all over the Earth.

http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/gpsuser/gpsuser.pdf
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/sigspec/default.htm
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/icd200/default.htm
http://www.trimble.com/gps/index.html
http://sirius.chinalake.navy.mil/satpred/
http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog/mog9/node9.html
http://egtphysics.net/GPS/RelGPS.htm
http://www.schriever.af.mil/gps/Current/current.oa1
http://edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html
http://www-astronomy.mps.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!

"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:27:45 GMT, "Minor Crank"
wrote:

"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message
.. .

Crank, TIME doesn't change in gravity gradients. Clocks do. You can see
it
happening in the GPS.

YOUR theory predicts that cesium beam clocks and rubidium glass cell
oscillators should differ in their behavior when lifted into orbit.

What is found is that exactly the SAME correction (which corresponds to
the
GR prediction) must be applied to them both, therefore YOUR theory is
wrong,
disproven, false, and stupid.

Do you really believe that Crank? Has anyone rigorously measured the rates
of
different clocks in free fall?

Yes. GPS.

Minor Crank

"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:31:25 -0700, Uncle Al
wrote:

They are all in the same orbit stooooooooopid.

YOUR theory predicts that, because of their differences in construction,
rubidium glass cell oscillators will require corrections for changes in
"gravitational stress," while cesium beam clocks won't.

This is in complete and absolute contradiction with what is observed.

Minor Crank

Henri:
The russian GPS are in different orbits...
from the american GPS

On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 03:20:30 GMT, "Minor Crank"
wrote:

"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:31:25 -0700, Uncle Al
wrote:

They are all in the same orbit stooooooooopid.

YOUR theory predicts that, because of their differences in construction,
rubidium glass cell oscillators will require corrections for changes in
"gravitational stress," while cesium beam clocks won't.

Crank, the OCs are seen to have changed rates. The causes are irrelevant.


This is in complete and absolute contradiction with what is observed.

What about pendulum clocks, Crank?


Minor Crank



Henri Wilson.

See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm

In sci.physics, Henri Wilson
HW@.
wrote
on Thu, 31 Jul 2003 23:55:19 GMT
:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:31:25 -0700, Uncle Al wrote:

Henri Wilson wrote:

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:27:45 GMT, "Minor Crank"
wrote:

"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message
.. .

Crank, TIME doesn't change in gravity gradients. Clocks do. You can see it
happening in the GPS.

YOUR theory predicts that cesium beam clocks and rubidium glass cell
oscillators should differ in their behavior when lifted into orbit.

What is found is that exactly the SAME correction (which corresponds to the
GR prediction) must be applied to them both, therefore YOUR theory is wrong,
disproven, false, and stupid.

Do you really believe that Crank? Has anyone rigorously measured the rates of
different clocks in free fall?

Yeah, stooopid,

Each of the 24 GPS satellites carries either four cesium atomic clocks
or three rubidum atomic clocks in orbit. Uncle Al cannot see how that
sums to fewer than 72 extremely precise clocks in freefall constantly
being addressed all over the Earth.

They are all in the same orbit stooooooooopid.

Erm, were they in the same orbit they'd be useless as a GPS.
The orbits are scattered around the globe.

[.sigsnip]

--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.

In article ,
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
In sci.physics, Henri Wilson
HW@.
wrote
snip

Each of the 24 GPS satellites carries either four cesium atomic clocks
or three rubidum atomic clocks in orbit. Uncle Al cannot see how that
sums to fewer than 72 extremely precise clocks in freefall constantly
being addressed all over the Earth.

snip denigration--look it up

Erm, were they in the same orbit they'd be useless as a GPS.
The orbits are scattered around the globe.

Well, another penny just dropped. I hadn't separated the GPS
satellites with the broadcasting satellites. It's the latter
who have the "same" orbits so that there is coverage 7x24...
isn't it?

/BAH


Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.