|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt51: reopening this edition to include rotation-period as agereckoning in Dirac new radioactivities #462 Atom Totality Theory book 4th ed
I was re-reading a quote from Rhodes's book:
THE MAKING OF THE ATOMIC BOMB, Rhodes, 1986, pp 29, 416 and reading about the Atomic Theory history when an idea crossed my mind about linking rotation-periods of astro bodies with Dirac new- radioactivities. If our solar system and our galaxy and our cosmos was built via Dirac New Radioactivities then the rotation periods of astro bodies would reflect their ages. The idea is akin to the sight of a skater who draws their arms in closer to their bodies and increasing in rotation about an axis. If our Solar System were built from a Nebular Dust Cloud theory we should not have a pattern of rotation periods. If our Solar System was built from Atom Totality with Dirac new-radioactivities then a pattern must exist. And I believe if this pattern exists for the Sun with inner planets distinct from outer gas giants would be proof of Dirac new radioactivities. So I went looking around for rotation periods and tilt, today. --- from this website --- http://cseligman.com/text/sky/rotationvsday.htm Rotation period Mercury 58.6 days Venus -243.0 days Earth 23 hours 56 minutes Moon 27.3 days Mars 24 hours 37 minutes Jupiter 9 hours 55 minutes Saturn 10 hours 32 minutes Uranus -17 hours 14 minutes Neptune 16 hours 6 minutes Pluto -6 days 9 hours Angle of tilt on axis: Mercury 0 degrees Venus -3 degrees Jupiter 3 degrees Uranus -82 degrees Pluto -72 degrees Earth 23.5 degrees Mars 25 degrees Saturn 27degrees Neptune 30 degrees --- From a different website, I needed to know the rotation period of the Sun --- from a source: Sun rotation period is approx 25 days Next, I needed the data on the satellites of the gas giants of their rotation-period and tilt: From Wikipedia data: Rotation period Ganymede synchronous with orbit 7.1 days, with tilt 0 degrees Callisto synchronous with orbit 16.7 days, 0 degrees Io synchronous 1.7 days, 0 degrees Europa synchronous with orbit 3.5 days, 0 degrees Titan synchronous 15.9 days, 0 degrees tilt Moon synchronous 27.3 days Finally, I was suspicious that comets would also have rotation periods so went looking and found this site: http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~meech/rot.html Apparently the nucleus of comets has a rotation period and this website gives rotation periods of about 7.6 hours to 15.0 hours on a list of comets studied. Can I draw any conclusions so far? Probably too premature, but I do notice the rotation period of our Sun closely matches that of the Moon. I also notice that the tilt on axis of Earth is closely matched by that of Mars, Saturn, Neptune. I remember a theory that the Moon collided with Earth very early in the history of Earth some 4 billion years ago and due to that collision, the theory went on to proffer that the tilt of Earth was caused. So I seriously doubt that Earth Moon collision when Mars is so much identical in tilt to Earth. I do notice a pattern starting to emerge in that the inner planets rotation period is in days whereas the gas giants are in hours. This would be like saying that the inner planets have stopping grow fast with Dirac new radioactivities and are old astro bodies whereas the gas giants are young astro bodies and are growing fast with new cosmic rays and cosmic gamma ray bursts. But I need to find out more data and to analyze much more on this. What is hopeful is that rotation period can eventually be the best guide in astronomy as to a "age of a astro body." So that if we have a fastly rotating galaxy, then it is a young galaxy and if we have a galaxy with not much rotation at all, then it is very old. Even applied to clusters of galaxies. One of the gravest weakness of modern astronomy is the lack of measuring for age and perhaps this rotation period linked to age is going to open up alot of new data. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt51: reopening this edition to include rotation-period asage reckoning in Dirac new radioactivities #462 Atom Totality Theory book4th ed
Le 16/06/11 10:13, Archimedes Plutonium a écrit :
I was re-reading a quote from Rhodes's book: THE MAKING OF THE ATOMIC BOMB, Rhodes, 1986, pp 29, 416 and reading about the Atomic Theory history when an idea crossed my mind about linking rotation-periods of astro bodies with Dirac new- radioactivities. If our solar system and our galaxy and our cosmos was built via Dirac New Radioactivities then the rotation periods of astro bodies would reflect their ages. OK... But reality being what it is, [snip] So I went looking around for rotation periods and tilt, today. Rotation period Mercury 58.6 days Venus -243.0 days Earth 23 hours 56 minutes Moon 27.3 days Mars 24 hours 37 minutes Jupiter 9 hours 55 minutes Saturn 10 hours 32 minutes Uranus -17 hours 14 minutes Neptune 16 hours 6 minutes Pluto -6 days 9 hours Sun 25 days Angle of tilt on axis: Mercury 0 degrees Venus -3 degrees Jupiter 3 degrees Uranus -82 degrees Pluto -72 degrees Earth 23.5 degrees Mars 25 degrees Saturn 27degrees Neptune 30 degrees Can I draw any conclusions so far? Probably too premature, but I do notice the rotation period of our Sun closely matches that of the Moon. Between 25 days (sun) and 27.3 days there is approx 10% difference... Of course, you can understand "closely" as you may wish. And you may wonder why you compare a satellite (the moon) with a star (the sun) that have nothing a priori in common besides being celestial bodies observable from earth... Why you do not include Neptune's satellites? Mystery. But even then, there is absolutely NO PATTERN here, so this theory should have been thrown to the dogs ages ago... But no, he goes on talking nonsense and making word salads: I do notice a pattern starting to emerge in that the inner planets rotation period is in days whereas the gas giants are in hours. This would be like saying that the inner planets have stopping grow fast with Dirac new radioactivities and are old astro bodies whereas the gas giants are young astro bodies and are growing fast with new cosmic rays and cosmic gamma ray bursts. The "giant astro bodies" are "growing with new cosmic rays" . GREAT. Cosmic rays are always one atom at most... So, a planet such as Jupiter "grows" one atom at a time. GREAT! It is incredible the nonsense that some people can spew in a few lines. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt51: reopening this edition to include rotation-period as age reckoning in Dirac new radioactivities #462 Atom Totality Theory book 4th ed
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
end of this edition; #461 Atom Totality Theory book 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | June 3rd 11 07:36 AM |
Chapt12 Dirac New Radioactivities #337 Atom Totality | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 25th 11 07:07 AM |
Chapt22 Dirac new radioactivities would also prove this theory #228Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 31st 09 03:48 AM |
MECO theory reinforced by Atom Totality theory #48 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | May 21st 09 07:51 PM |
Tifft quantized galaxy speeds #22 ;3rd edition book: ATOM TOTALITY(Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 9th 09 11:01 PM |