High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 03:53:36 GMT, in a place far, far away,
(Rand Simberg) made the
phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:

On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:25:24 GMT, in a place far, far away, "Kim
Keller" made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:


"Rand Simberg" wrote in message
...
Just assuming for the sake of argument that you're right (though
there's little reason to think so), just what should he have done
instead?

I don't know. I just personally feel that his plan is nothing more than a
bit of eyewash to help his re-electibility.

Then we'll give your criticism, and "feelings" all the respect they're
due.

Just as a follow-up, here's a pertinent Fox News column I just
published:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,111160,00.html

"Rand Simberg" wrote in message
.. .
Just as a follow-up, here's a pertinent Fox News column I just
published:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,111160,00.html

I'm sure we'll give your opinions, criticism, and feelings all the respect
they're due.

The simple fact that you've established a public pulpit for your opinions
does nothing to make them any more relevant, or even fact-based, than anyone
else's opinions, so please shelve your feelings of intellectual superiority.
Particularly since you chose to align yourself with Fox.

-Kim-

*waving goodbye to .moderated*

"Kim Keller" wrote in message . ..
"Rand Simberg" wrote in message
.. .
Just as a follow-up, here's a pertinent Fox News column I just
published:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,111160,00.html

I'm sure we'll give your opinions, criticism, and feelings all the respect
they're due.

The simple fact that you've established a public pulpit for your opinions
does nothing to make them any more relevant, or even fact-based, than anyone
else's opinions, so please shelve your feelings of intellectual superiority.
Particularly since you chose to align yourself with Fox.

Hey! (Some) Fox columnists have principles too.

http://www.cjonline.com/stories/0212..._oreilly.shtml

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 04:16:56 -0800 (PST), in a place far, far away,
"Kim Keller" made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:

I'm sure we'll give your opinions, criticism, and feelings all the respect
they're due.

I expect no more, or less.

The simple fact that you've established a public pulpit for your opinions
does nothing to make them any more relevant, or even fact-based, than anyone
else's opinions, so please shelve your feelings of intellectual superiority.

It has nothing to do with intellect.

Particularly since you chose to align yourself with Fox.

Pointless and baseless ad hominem noted.

The simple fact that you've established a public pulpit for your opinions
does nothing to make them any more relevant, or even fact-based, than
anyone
else's opinions, so please shelve your feelings of intellectual
superiority.
Particularly since you chose to align yourself with Fox.

-Kim-

LOL The "fair and balanced" news! Aligning oneself with Fox already
portrays a right-wing slant.

The Ruzicka Family wrote:
: The simple fact that you've established a public pulpit for your opinions
: does nothing to make them any more relevant, or even fact-based, than
: anyone
: else's opinions, so please shelve your feelings of intellectual
: superiority.
: Particularly since you chose to align yourself with Fox.
:
: -Kim-
:
: LOL The "fair and balanced" news! Aligning oneself with Fox already
: portrays a right-wing slant.


Are you implying that a right wing slant is bad?

Do you imagine that all who contribute to Fox News carry a right
wing slant? Would this be true of Mara Liasson and Susan Estridge,
for example?




--- Gregg
"Improvise, adapt, overcome."

Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Phone: (617) 496-1558

February 12, 2004

Gregg Germain wrote:

: LOL The "fair and balanced" news! Aligning oneself with Fox already
: portrays a right-wing slant.

Are you implying that a right wing slant is bad?

Yes

Do you imagine that all who contribute to Fox News carry a right
wing slant?

No, it's real, easily detectable. The others are deep cover operatives.

Would this be true of Mara Liasson and Susan Estridge,

It's definitely true for Rand SimBorg, rabid reactionary crackpot.

Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net

(Paul Rezzo) wrote in message . com...
(Rand Simberg) wrote in message ...
On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 06:28:15 GMT, in a place far, far away, "Kim
Keller" made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:



Just assuming for the sake of argument that you're right (though
there's little reason to think so), just what should he have done
instead?



As a suggestion how about,

snip hysterical propoganda

How's that for a start.

Wow, I'm happy to criticise America, but you sure have been brain
washed. There's a grain of truth half your statements, but you
obviously made up your mind a long time ago.

Personally, I like Churchill's (?) summary: You can normally rely on
America to do the right thing.....

..... after it's explored all the other options.

I guess Bush can't do much about US cuisine?

"The Ruzicka Family" wrote in message ...
The simple fact that you've established a public pulpit for your opinions
does nothing to make them any more relevant, or even fact-based, than
anyone
else's opinions, so please shelve your feelings of intellectual
superiority.
Particularly since you chose to align yourself with Fox.

-Kim-

LOL The "fair and balanced" news! Aligning oneself with Fox already
portrays a right-wing slant.

Fox can't help it that liberals see any middle position as
'conservative,' which I suppose it is compared to the left wing slant
that CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, and MSNBC have been spewing for years. Many
studies have documented this bias on political coverage, especially
with regard to word choice and segment selection. Did you know that
CNN, ABC, and Newsweek ALL had the exact same information for TWO
WEEKS prior to the story Drudge 'broke' on Monica Lewinski? I
certainly didn't see a delay in Bob Packwood, Anita Hill coverage or
this trumped up Bush Nat'l Guard issue.

Tom Merkle

In article ,
Rand Simberg wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,111160,00.html


Nitpick: Dwayne Day was on the Columbia AIB, not Challenger.

--
Kathy Rages